These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

518 related items for PubMed ID: 27374479

  • 1. Place dependent stimulation rates improve pitch perception in cochlear implantees with single-sided deafness.
    Rader T, Döge J, Adel Y, Weissgerber T, Baumann U.
    Hear Res; 2016 Sep; 339():94-103. PubMed ID: 27374479
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Interaural Place-of-Stimulation Mismatch Estimates Using CT Scans and Binaural Perception, But Not Pitch, Are Consistent in Cochlear-Implant Users.
    Bernstein JGW, Jensen KK, Stakhovskaya OA, Noble JH, Hoa M, Kim HJ, Shih R, Kolberg E, Cleary M, Goupell MJ.
    J Neurosci; 2021 Dec 08; 41(49):10161-10178. PubMed ID: 34725189
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Pitch and loudness matching of unmodulated and modulated stimuli in cochlear implantees.
    Vandali A, Sly D, Cowan R, van Hoesel R.
    Hear Res; 2013 Aug 08; 302():32-49. PubMed ID: 23685148
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Electro-acoustic pitch matching experiments in patients with single-sided deafness and a cochlear implant: Is there a need for adjustment of the default frequency allocation tables?
    Peters JPM, Bennink E, Grolman W, van Zanten GA.
    Hear Res; 2016 Dec 08; 342():124-133. PubMed ID: 27789255
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of Place-versus-Pitch Mismatch between a Perimodiolar and Lateral Wall Cochlear Implant Electrode Array in Patients with Single-Sided Deafness and a Cochlear Implant.
    Peters JPM, Bennink E, van Zanten GA.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2019 Dec 08; 24(1):38-48. PubMed ID: 30995658
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effects of interaural pitch matching and auditory image centering on binaural sensitivity in cochlear implant users.
    Kan A, Litovsky RY, Goupell MJ.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Dec 08; 36(3):e62-8. PubMed ID: 25565660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Electric-acoustic pitch comparisons in single-sided-deaf cochlear implant users: frequency-place functions and rate pitch.
    Schatzer R, Vermeire K, Visser D, Krenmayr A, Kals M, Voormolen M, Van de Heyning P, Zierhofer C.
    Hear Res; 2014 Mar 08; 309():26-35. PubMed ID: 24252455
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Pitch matching psychometrics in electric acoustic stimulation.
    Baumann U, Rader T, Helbig S, Bahmer A.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Mar 08; 32(5):656-62. PubMed ID: 21869623
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Perceptual changes with monopolar and phantom electrode stimulation.
    Klawitter S, Landsberger DM, Büchner A, Nogueira W.
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar 08; 359():64-75. PubMed ID: 29325874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Electrical stimulation of the auditory nerve: the coding of frequency, the perception of pitch and the development of cochlear implant speech processing strategies for profoundly deaf people.
    Clark GM.
    Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol; 1996 Sep 08; 23(9):766-76. PubMed ID: 8911712
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Neural tonotopy in cochlear implants: an evaluation in unilateral cochlear implant patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus.
    Vermeire K, Nobbe A, Schleich P, Nopp P, Voormolen MH, Van de Heyning PH.
    Hear Res; 2008 Nov 08; 245(1-2):98-106. PubMed ID: 18817861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Pitch Matching between Electrical Stimulation of a Cochlear Implant and Acoustic Stimuli Presented to a Contralateral Ear with Residual Hearing.
    Tan CT, Martin B, Svirsky MA.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Mar 08; 28(3):187-199. PubMed ID: 28277210
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Qualities of Single Electrode Stimulation as a Function of Rate and Place of Stimulation with a Cochlear Implant.
    Landsberger DM, Vermeire K, Claes A, Van Rompaey V, Van de Heyning P.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Mar 08; 37(3):e149-59. PubMed ID: 26583480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Characterizing the relationship between modulation sensitivity and pitch resolution in cochlear implant users.
    Camarena A, Goldsworthy RL.
    Hear Res; 2024 Jul 08; 448():109026. PubMed ID: 38776706
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Effects of electrode array length on frequency-place mismatch and speech perception with cochlear implants.
    Venail F, Mathiolon C, Menjot de Champfleur S, Piron JP, Sicard M, Villemus F, Vessigaud MA, Sterkers-Artieres F, Mondain M, Uziel A.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2015 Jul 08; 20(2):102-11. PubMed ID: 25678235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 26.