These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

402 related items for PubMed ID: 27377742

  • 1. Comparison of AIMS65 Score and Other Scoring Systems for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Koreans with Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Park SM, Yeum SC, Kim BW, Kim JS, Kim JH, Sim EH, Ji JS, Choi H.
    Gut Liver; 2016 Jul 15; 10(4):526-31. PubMed ID: 27377742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. AIMS65 scoring system is comparable to Glasgow-Blatchford score or Rockall score for prediction of clinical outcomes for non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kim MS, Choi J, Shin WC.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2019 Jul 26; 19(1):136. PubMed ID: 31349816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Risk stratification in acute upper GI bleeding: comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems.
    Robertson M, Majumdar A, Boyapati R, Chung W, Worland T, Terbah R, Wei J, Lontos S, Angus P, Vaughan R.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Jun 26; 83(6):1151-60. PubMed ID: 26515955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of three risk scores to predict outcomes in upper gastrointestinal bleeding; modifying Glasgow-Blatchford with albumin.
    Shafaghi A, Gharibpoor F, Mahdipour Z, Samadani AA.
    Rom J Intern Med; 2019 Dec 01; 57(4):322-333. PubMed ID: 31268861
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of risk scoring systems for patients presenting with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: international multicentre prospective study.
    Stanley AJ, Laine L, Dalton HR, Ngu JH, Schultz M, Abazi R, Zakko L, Thornton S, Wilkinson K, Khor CJ, Murray IA, Laursen SB, International Gastrointestinal Bleeding Consortium.
    BMJ; 2017 Jan 04; 356():i6432. PubMed ID: 28053181
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score and modified Glasgow-Blatchford bleeding score in predicting outcomes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding: An accuracy and calibration study.
    Akhila Arya PV, Thulaseedharan NK, Raj R, Unnikrishnan DC, Jacob A.
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2023 Aug 04; 42(4):496-504. PubMed ID: 37382854
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of three scoring systems for risk stratification in elderly patients wıth acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Kalkan Ç, Soykan I, Karakaya F, Tüzün A, Gençtürk ZB.
    Geriatr Gerontol Int; 2017 Apr 04; 17(4):575-583. PubMed ID: 27075860
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of the Glasgow-Blatchford and AIMS65 scoring systems for risk stratification in upper gastrointestinal bleeding in the emergency department.
    Yaka E, Yılmaz S, Doğan NÖ, Pekdemir M.
    Acad Emerg Med; 2015 Jan 04; 22(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25556538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Glasgow Blatchford, pre-endoscopic Rockall and AIMS65 scores show no difference in predicting rebleeding rate and mortality in variceal bleeding.
    Budimir I, Gradišer M, Nikolić M, Baršić N, Ljubičić N, Kralj D, Budimir I.
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2016 Nov 04; 51(11):1375-9. PubMed ID: 27356670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.
    Rout G, Sharma S, Gunjan D, Kedia S, Nayak B, Shalimar.
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr 04; 38(2):158-166. PubMed ID: 30830583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding.
    Hyett BH, Abougergi MS, Charpentier JP, Kumar NL, Brozovic S, Claggett BL, Travis AC, Saltzman JR.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Apr 04; 77(4):551-7. PubMed ID: 23357496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Prospective Comparison of the AIMS65 Score, Glasgow-Blatchford Score, and Rockall Score for Predicting Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Variceal and Nonvariceal Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Chang A, Ouejiaraphant C, Akarapatima K, Rattanasupa A, Prachayakul V.
    Clin Endosc; 2021 Mar 04; 54(2):211-221. PubMed ID: 32668528
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The prognostic significance of the risk scores at upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Uysal Y, Babus SB, Kose A, Ates F, Biricik S, Erdogan S, Cevik I, Toker I, Ayrik C.
    Niger J Clin Pract; 2019 Aug 04; 22(8):1099-1108. PubMed ID: 31417053
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The Shock Index is not accurate at predicting outcomes in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Saffouri E, Blackwell C, Laursen SB, Laine L, Dalton HR, Ngu J, Shultz M, Norton R, Stanley AJ.
    Aliment Pharmacol Ther; 2020 Jan 04; 51(2):253-260. PubMed ID: 31642558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 21.