These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


398 related items for PubMed ID: 27409091

  • 21. [The usefulness of the Baylor score in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a hospital in Lima, Peru].
    Bravo Paredes EA, Guzmán Rojas P, Gallegos López RC, Ciliotta Chehade A, Corzo Maldonado MA, Huerta Mercado-Tenorio J, Surco Ochoa Y, Zegarra Chang A, Prochazka Zárate R, Piscoya Rivera A, Pinto Valdivia J, De los Ríos Senmache R.
    Rev Gastroenterol Peru; 2013; 33(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 24419027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Far from an ideal score.
    Aluizio CLS, Montes CG, Reis GFSR, Nagasako CK.
    Clinics (Sao Paulo); 2021; 76():e2921. PubMed ID: 34190855
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Comparison of AIMS65, Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring approaches in predicting the risk of in-hospital death among emergency hospitalized patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding: a retrospective observational study in Nanjing, China.
    Gu L, Xu F, Yuan J.
    BMC Gastroenterol; 2018 Jun 28; 18(1):98. PubMed ID: 29954332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. The AIMS65 score compared with the Glasgow-Blatchford score in predicting outcomes in upper GI bleeding.
    Hyett BH, Abougergi MS, Charpentier JP, Kumar NL, Brozovic S, Claggett BL, Travis AC, Saltzman JR.
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2013 Apr 28; 77(4):551-7. PubMed ID: 23357496
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Comparison of the AIMS65 score with the Glasgow-Blatchford and Rockall scoring systems for the prediction of the risk of in-hospital death among patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Lu X, Zhang X, Chen H.
    Rev Esp Enferm Dig; 2020 Jun 28; 112(6):467-473. PubMed ID: 32379473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. Emergency endoscopy for acute gastrointestinal bleeding: prognostic value of endoscopic hemostasis and the AIMS65 score in Japanese patients.
    Nakamura S, Matsumoto T, Sugimori H, Esaki M, Kitazono T, Hashizume M.
    Dig Endosc; 2014 May 28; 26(3):369-76. PubMed ID: 24168099
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Risk stratification in acute variceal bleeding: Comparison of the AIMS65 score to established upper gastrointestinal bleeding and liver disease severity risk stratification scoring systems in predicting mortality and rebleeding.
    Robertson M, Ng J, Abu Shawish W, Swaine A, Skardoon G, Huynh A, Deshpande S, Low ZY, Sievert W, Angus P.
    Dig Endosc; 2020 Jul 28; 32(5):761-768. PubMed ID: 31863515
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Comparison of various prognostic scores in variceal and non-variceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding: A prospective cohort study.
    Rout G, Sharma S, Gunjan D, Kedia S, Nayak B, Shalimar.
    Indian J Gastroenterol; 2019 Apr 28; 38(2):158-166. PubMed ID: 30830583
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29. AIMS65 predicts prognosis of patients with duodenal ulcer bleeding; a comparison with other risk-scoring systems.
    Hirai R, Shimodate Y, Minami M, Ishikawa S, Kanadani T, Takezawa R, Doi A, Nishimura N, Mouri H, Matsueda K, Yamamoto H, Mizuno M.
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2021 Dec 01; 33(12):1480-1484. PubMed ID: 33252414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. Validity of modified early warning, Glasgow Blatchford, and pre-endoscopic Rockall scores in predicting prognosis of patients presenting to emergency department with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Bozkurt S, Köse A, Arslan ED, Erdoğan S, Üçbilek E, Çevik İ, Ayrık C, Sezgin O.
    Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med; 2015 Dec 30; 23():109. PubMed ID: 26714636
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. Prospective multicenter validation of the Glasgow Blatchford bleeding score in the management of patients with upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage presenting at an emergency department.
    Aquarius M, Smeets FG, Konijn HW, Stassen PM, Keulen ET, Van Deursen CT, Masclee AA, Keulemans YC.
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2015 Sep 30; 27(9):1011-6. PubMed ID: 26049709
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32. Is the Glasgow Blatchford score useful in the risk assessment of patients presenting with variceal haemorrhage?
    Reed EA, Dalton H, Blatchford O, Ashley D, Mowat C, Gaya DR, Cahill A, Warshow U, Hare N, Groome M, Forrest EH, Morris J, Stanley AJ.
    Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2014 Apr 30; 26(4):432-7. PubMed ID: 24535596
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Risk scoring systems to predict need for clinical intervention for patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal tract bleeding.
    Chen IC, Hung MS, Chiu TF, Chen JC, Hsiao CT.
    Am J Emerg Med; 2007 Sep 30; 25(7):774-9. PubMed ID: 17870480
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Performance of the Rockall scoring system in predicting the need for intervention and outcomes in patients with nonvariceal upper gastrointestinal bleeding in a Brazilian setting: a prospective study.
    Custódio Lima J, Garcia Montes C, Kibune Nagasako C, Soares Ruppert Reis GF, Meirelles Dos Santos JO, Guerrazzi F, Mesquita MA.
    Digestion; 2013 Sep 30; 88(4):252-7. PubMed ID: 24335273
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Comparison of AIMS65 and Glasgow Blatchford scores in predicting mortality in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding.
    Ak R, Hökenek NM.
    Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992); 2021 Jun 30; 67(5):766-770. PubMed ID: 34550270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. Comparison of Glasgow-Blatchford Score and Rockall Score in Patients with Upper Gastrointestinal Bleeding.
    Custovic N, Husic-Selimovic A, Srsen N, Prohic D.
    Med Arch; 2020 Aug 30; 74(4):270-274. PubMed ID: 33041443
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.