These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Comparison of Rater's reliability on perceptual evaluation of different types of voice sample. Law T, Kim JH, Lee KY, Tang EC, Lam JH, van Hasselt AC, Tong MC. J Voice; 2012 Sep; 26(5):666.e13-21. PubMed ID: 22243971 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech. Maryn Y, Kim HT, Kim J. J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26316139 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Concatenation of the Moving Window Technique for Auditory-Perceptual Analysis of Voice Quality. Ehrlich B, Lin L, Jiang J. Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2018 Nov 21; 27(4):1426-1433. PubMed ID: 30304342 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The Relationship Between the Aerodynamic Parameters of Voice and Perceptual Evaluation in the Iranian Population With or Without Voice Disorders. Aghajanzadeh M, Darouie A, Dabirmoghaddam P, Salehi A, Rahgozar M. J Voice; 2017 Mar 21; 31(2):250.e9-250.e15. PubMed ID: 27542776 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Cepstral analysis of hypokinetic and ataxic voices: correlations with perceptual and other acoustic measures. Jannetts S, Lowit A. J Voice; 2014 Nov 21; 28(6):673-80. PubMed ID: 24836365 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of listener experience, measurement scale and speech task on the reliability of auditory-perceptual evaluation of vocal quality. Alves JDN, Almeida AAF, Yamasaki R, Lopes LW. Codas; 2024 Nov 21; 36(3):e20230175. PubMed ID: 38629682 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]