These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1026 related items for PubMed ID: 27427182

  • 1. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Lithuanian Language.
    Uloza V, Petrauskas T, Padervinskis E, Ulozaitė N, Barsties B, Maryn Y.
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):257.e1-257.e11. PubMed ID: 27427182
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. A comparison of Dysphonia Severity Index and Acoustic Voice Quality Index measures in differentiating normal and dysphonic voices.
    Uloza V, Latoszek BBV, Ulozaite-Staniene N, Petrauskas T, Maryn Y.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Apr; 275(4):949-958. PubMed ID: 29442165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Auditory-Perceptual and Acoustic Methods in Measuring Dysphonia Severity of Korean Speech.
    Maryn Y, Kim HT, Kim J.
    J Voice; 2016 Sep; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26316139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Korean Language.
    Kim GH, Lee YW, Bae IH, Park HJ, Wang SG, Kwon SB.
    J Voice; 2019 Nov; 33(6):948.e1-948.e9. PubMed ID: 30076095
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index, Version 03.01, in French.
    Pommée T, Maryn Y, Finck C, Morsomme D.
    J Voice; 2020 Jul; 34(4):646.e11-646.e26. PubMed ID: 30598420
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index in the Japanese Language.
    Hosokawa K, Barsties B, Iwahashi T, Iwahashi M, Kato C, Iwaki S, Sasai H, Miyauchi A, Matsushiro N, Inohara H, Ogawa M, Maryn Y.
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):260.e1-260.e9. PubMed ID: 27287930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The acoustic voice quality index version 02.02 in the Finnish-speaking population.
    Kankare E, Barsties V Latoszek B, Maryn Y, Asikainen M, Rorarius E, Vilpas S, Ilomäki I, Tyrmi J, Rantala L, Laukkanen AM.
    Logoped Phoniatr Vocol; 2020 Jul; 45(2):49-56. PubMed ID: 30720373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Validation and Test-Retest Reliability of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 02.06 in the Turkish Language.
    Yeşilli-Puzella G, Tadıhan-Özkan E, Maryn Y.
    J Voice; 2022 Sep; 36(5):736.e25-736.e32. PubMed ID: 32962941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Toward improved ecological validity in the acoustic measurement of overall voice quality: combining continuous speech and sustained vowels.
    Maryn Y, Corthals P, Van Cauwenberge P, Roy N, De Bodt M.
    J Voice; 2010 Sep; 24(5):540-55. PubMed ID: 19883993
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in German.
    Barsties V Latoszek B, Lehnert B, Janotte B.
    J Voice; 2020 Jan; 34(1):157.e17-157.e25. PubMed ID: 30217485
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparison and Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 2 and Version 3 among South Indian Population.
    Jayakumar T, Rajasudhakar R, Benoy JJ.
    J Voice; 2024 Sep; 38(5):1248.e1-1248.e9. PubMed ID: 35337701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. External Validation of the Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 03.01 With Extended Representativity.
    Barsties B, Maryn Y.
    Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Jul; 125(7):571-83. PubMed ID: 26951063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Validation of Acoustic Voice Quality Index Version 3.01 and Acoustic Breathiness Index in Korean Population.
    Kim GH, von Latoszek BB, Lee YW.
    J Voice; 2021 Jul; 35(4):660.e9-660.e18. PubMed ID: 31708369
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Acoustic Voice Quality Index as a Potential Tool for Voice Screening.
    Faham M, Laukkanen AM, Ikävalko T, Rantala L, Geneid A, Holmqvist-Jämsén S, Ruusuvirta K, Pirilä S.
    J Voice; 2021 Mar; 35(2):226-232. PubMed ID: 31582330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Acoustic Breathiness Index: Analysis With Different Speech Material in the Brazilian Portuguese.
    Englert M, Lima L, Behlau M.
    J Voice; 2020 Sep; 34(5):810.e11-810.e17. PubMed ID: 31005448
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. The Exploration of an Objective Model for Roughness With Several Acoustic Markers.
    Latoszek BBV, De Bodt M, Gerrits E, Maryn Y.
    J Voice; 2018 Mar; 32(2):149-161. PubMed ID: 28572016
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparison of Two Multiparameter Acoustic Indices of Dysphonia Severity: The Acoustic Voice Quality Index and Cepstral Spectral Index of Dysphonia.
    Lee JM, Roy N, Peterson E, Merrill RM.
    J Voice; 2018 Jul; 32(4):515.e1-515.e13. PubMed ID: 28739333
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Voice in Friedreich Ataxia.
    Vogel AP, Wardrop MI, Folker JE, Synofzik M, Corben LA, Delatycki MB, Awan SN.
    J Voice; 2017 Mar; 31(2):243.e9-243.e19. PubMed ID: 27501923
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Speech tasks and interrater reliability in perceptual voice evaluation.
    Lu FL, Matteson S.
    J Voice; 2014 Nov; 28(6):725-32. PubMed ID: 24841668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Exploring The Validity of Acoustic Measurements and Other Voice Assessments.
    Englert M, Latoszek BBV, Behlau M.
    J Voice; 2024 May; 38(3):567-571. PubMed ID: 35022153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 52.