These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: linear incision technique with tissue preservation versus linear incision technique with tissue reduction. van der Stee EHH, Strijbos RM, Bom SJH, Hol MKS. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jul; 275(7):1737-1747. PubMed ID: 29846791 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Percutaneous bone-anchored hearing implant surgery: inside or outside the line of incision? Strijbos RM, den Besten CA, Mylanus EA, Hol MK. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2016 Nov; 273(11):3713-3722. PubMed ID: 27086360 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Punch and Drill: Implantation of Bone Anchored Hearing Device Through a Minimal Skin Punch Incision Versus Implantation With Dermatome and Soft Tissue Reduction. Dumon T, Medina M, Sperling NM. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol; 2016 Mar; 125(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 26384503 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Bone-anchored Hearing Implant Surgery: Randomized Trial of Dermatome Versus Linear Incision Without Soft Tissue Reduction--Clinical Measures. Høgsbro M, Agger A, Johansen LV. Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jun; 36(5):805-11. PubMed ID: 25695686 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Post-operative infection rates in linear vs. punch technique for bone anchored hearing systems. Kellermeyer B, Lange L, Wazen JJ. Am J Otolaryngol; 2020 Jun; 41(6):102745. PubMed ID: 33198052 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Skin reactions after BAHA surgery: a comparison between the U-graft technique and the BAHA dermatome. Stalfors J, Tjellström A. Otol Neurotol; 2008 Dec; 29(8):1109-14. PubMed ID: 18758391 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. First Report: Linear Incision for Placement of a Magnetically Coupled Bone-Anchored Hearing Implant. Barry JY, Reghunathan S, Jacob A. Otol Neurotol; 2017 Feb; 38(2):221-224. PubMed ID: 28068302 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Skin reactions following BAHA surgery using the skin flap dermatome technique. Van Rompaey V, Claes G, Verstraeten N, van Dinther J, Zarowski A, Offeciers E, Somers T. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2011 Mar; 268(3):373-6. PubMed ID: 20976464 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Successful loading of a bone-anchored hearing implant at two weeks after surgery: randomized trial of two surgical methods and detailed stability measurements. Høgsbro M, Agger A, Johansen LV. Otol Neurotol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):e51-7. PubMed ID: 25341064 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Implantation of Bone-Anchored Hearing Devices Through a Minimal Skin Punch Incision Versus the Epidermal Flap Technique. Dumon T, Wegner I, Sperling N, Grolman W. Otol Neurotol; 2017 Jan; 38(1):89-96. PubMed ID: 27779562 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Long-Term Results of the Linear Incision Technique With Tissue Reduction Versus Tissue Preservation for Inserting Bone-Anchored Hearing Implants: The Ongoing Optimization in Bone Implant Surgery. Lindeboom JJ, Labbé N, Strijbos RM, van den Elsen-Hutten M, van Huffelen W, Teunissen EM, Hol MKS, Bom SJH. Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar 01; 45(3):285-294. PubMed ID: 38361296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Minimal invasive pocket technique for magnet bone implant hearing aid without fixation. Dolhen P, Lipski S, Touijar R, Van Bogaert J. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Mar 01; 277(3):715-725. PubMed ID: 31811384 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A five-year follow-up on the osseointegration of bone-anchored hearing device implantation without tissue reduction. Hultcrantz M, Lanis A. Otol Neurotol; 2014 Sep 01; 35(8):1480-5. PubMed ID: 24770406 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Histologic and morphologic evaluation of explanted bone anchors from bone-anchored hearing aids. Mlynski R, Goldberg E, Ebmeyer J, Scheich M, Gattenlöhner S, Schwager K, Hagen R, Shehata-Dieler W. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2009 May 01; 266(5):745-52. PubMed ID: 18853170 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Simplified bone-anchored hearing aid insertion using a linear incision without soft tissue reduction. Husseman J, Szudek J, Monksfield P, Power D, O'Leary S, Briggs R. J Laryngol Otol; 2013 Jul 01; 127 Suppl 2():S33-8. PubMed ID: 23651553 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. [Comparison of skin complications between dermatome and U-graft technique in BAHA surgery]. Tamarit Conejeros JM, Dalmau Galofre J, Murcia Puchades V, Pons Rocher F, Fernández Martínez S, Estrems Navas P. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp; 2009 Jul 01; 60(6):422-7. PubMed ID: 19909718 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA): skin healing process for skin flap technique versus linear incision technique in the first three months after the implantation. Mudry A. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009 Jul 01; 130(4-5):281-4. PubMed ID: 20597411 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Retrospective analysis of skin complications related to bone-anchored hearing aid implant: association with surgical technique, quality of life, and audiological benefit. Peñaranda D, Garcia JM, Aparicio ML, Montes F, Barón C, Jiménez RC, Peñaranda A. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol; 2018 Jul 01; 84(3):324-331. PubMed ID: 28506614 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A minimally invasive technique for the implantation of bone-anchored hearing devices. Wilson DF, Kim HH. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Sep 01; 149(3):473-7. PubMed ID: 23740414 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]