These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

392 related items for PubMed ID: 27447146

  • 41. The Effect of Compressive Cyclic Loading on the Retention of Cast Single Crowns Cemented to Implant Abutments.
    Alvarez-Arenal A, Gonzalez-Gonzalez I, Pinés-Hueso J, deLlanos-Lanchares H, del Rio Highsmith J.
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):80-2. PubMed ID: 26757336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Effects of modifying implant screw access channels on the amount of extruded excess cement and retention of cement-retained implant-supported dental prostheses: A systematic review.
    Davoudi A, Rismanchian M.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan; 121(1):52-58. PubMed ID: 30006223
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. Effects of a cementing technique in addition to luting agent on the uniaxial retention force of a single-tooth implant-supported restoration: an in vitro study.
    Santosa RE, Martin W, Morton D.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2010 Jan; 25(6):1145-52. PubMed ID: 21197491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. An esthetic solution to the screw-retained implant restoration: introduction to the implant crown adhesive plug: clinical report.
    Wadhwani C, Piñeyro A, Avots J.
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2011 Jun; 23(3):138-43. PubMed ID: 21649826
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Comparison of uniaxial resistance forces of cements used with implant-supported crowns.
    Akça K, Iplikçioğlu H, Cehreli MC.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002 Jun; 17(4):536-42. PubMed ID: 12182296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Evaluation of Effectiveness of Cement Removal From Implant-Retained Crowns Using a Proposed "Circular Crisscross" Flossing Technique.
    Ferreira CF, Shafter M, Jain V, Wicks RA, Linder E, da Silva Ledo CA.
    J Oral Implantol; 2018 Jun; 44(3):177-183. PubMed ID: 29436969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47. Influence of space size of abutment screw access channel on the amount of extruded excess cement and marginal accuracy of cement-retained single implant restorations.
    Al Amri MD, Al-Johany SS, Al-Qarni MN, Al-Bakri AS, Al-Maflehi NS, Abualsaud HS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Feb; 119(2):263-269. PubMed ID: 28552289
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Effect of abutment modification and cement type on retention of cement-retained implant supported crowns.
    Farzin M, Torabi K, Ahangari AH, Derafshi R.
    J Dent (Tehran); 2014 May; 11(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 25628660
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49. Using a porcelain furnace to debond cement-retained implant crown from the abutment after screw fracture: a clinical report.
    Saponaro PC, Heshmati RH, Lee DJ.
    J Prosthodont; 2015 Apr; 24(3):239-42. PubMed ID: 25316610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. A modified technique for preventing excess cement around implant supported restoration margins.
    Rayyan MM, Makarem HA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):840-842. PubMed ID: 27460328
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Effect of different geometric changes in the dental implant abutment body on the amount of residual excess cement and retention in a cemented implant-supported prosthesis.
    Negahdari R, Bohlouli S, Yazdani J, Torab A, Dizaj SM.
    Dent Med Probl; 2021 Dec; 58(2):207-213. PubMed ID: 34019744
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Retention of CAD/CAM all-ceramic crowns on prefabricated implant abutments: an in vitro comparative study of luting agents and abutment surface area.
    Carnaggio TV, Conrad R, Engelmeier RL, Gerngross P, Paravina R, Perezous L, Powers JM.
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):523-8. PubMed ID: 22469271
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Influence of abutment height and thermocycling on retrievability of cemented implant-supported crowns.
    Mehl C, Harder S, Shahriari A, Steiner M, Kern M.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012 Oct; 27(5):1106-15. PubMed ID: 23057023
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. How can excess residual cement be reduced in implant-supported restorations?: An in vitro study.
    Gönder A, Polat S, Kılıçarslan MA, Ocak M, Tamam E.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Oct; 25(5):807-814. PubMed ID: 37232125
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. A Novel Universal Cementation Technique for Implant-Supported Crowns with Subgingival Margins.
    Bhushan P, Aras MA, Chitre V, Mysore AR, Daswani SR.
    J Prosthodont; 2017 Oct; 26(7):628-632. PubMed ID: 26861492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Comparison of Oxygen Plasma Treatment and Sandblasting of Titanium Implant-Abutment Surface on Bond Strength and Surface Topography.
    El-Helbawy NG, El-Hatery AA, Ahmed MH.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016 Oct; 31(3):555-62. PubMed ID: 27183064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.