These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

440 related items for PubMed ID: 27447147

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Wear of Morse taper and external hexagon implant joints after abutment removal.
    Prado AM, Pereira J, Silva FS, Henriques B, Nascimento RM, Benfatti CAM, López-López J, Souza JCM.
    J Mater Sci Mater Med; 2017 May; 28(5):65. PubMed ID: 28321800
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Experimental research on the relationship between fit accuracy and fracture resistance of zirconia abutments.
    Sui X, Wei H, Wang D, Han Y, Deng J, Wang Y, Wang J, Yang J.
    J Dent; 2014 Oct; 42(10):1353-9. PubMed ID: 24561040
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effect of internal hexagonal index on removal torque and tensile removal force of different Morse taper connection abutments.
    de Oliveira Silva TS, Mendes Alencar SM, da Silva Valente V, de Moura CDVS.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):621-627. PubMed ID: 27881313
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. A Comparison of Torque Stress on Abutment Screw of External Hexagon and Morse Taper Implant.
    Rodrigues EDS, Benetti P, Carli JP, Paranhos LR, Santos PL, Linden MS.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2018 Nov 01; 19(11):1306-1311. PubMed ID: 30602632
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of microgap size in Morse taper implants with straight and angled abutments.
    Costa MB, Ferreira LF, Marqueti AC, Takeshita WM, Trento CL.
    Gen Dent; 2022 Nov 01; 70(6):34-39. PubMed ID: 36288073
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Examination of the implant-abutment interface after fatigue testing.
    Cibirka RM, Nelson SK, Lang BR, Rueggeberg FA.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2001 Mar 01; 85(3):268-75. PubMed ID: 11264934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Bacterial colonization of the implant-abutment interface using an in vitro dynamic loading model.
    Koutouzis T, Wallet S, Calderon N, Lundgren T.
    J Periodontol; 2011 Apr 01; 82(4):613-8. PubMed ID: 21043798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Performance of different abutment/implant joints as a result of a sealing agent.
    Seloto CB, Strazzi-Sahyon HB, Dos Santos PH, Assunção WG.
    J Prosthodont Res; 2021 Oct 15; 65(4):489-494. PubMed ID: 34470982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The behavior of a zirconia or metal abutment on the implant-abutment interface during cyclic loading.
    Queiroz DA, Hagee N, Lee DJ, Zheng F.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 Aug 15; 124(2):211-216. PubMed ID: 31810616
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 22.