These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

201 related items for PubMed ID: 27448029

  • 1. A TASER conducted electrical weapon with cardiac biomonitoring capability: Proof of concept and initial human trial.
    Stopyra JP, Ritter SI, Beatty J, Johnson JC, Kleiner DM, Winslow JE, Gardner AR, Bozeman WP.
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2016 Oct; 43():48-52. PubMed ID: 27448029
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Intracardiac electrocardiographic assessment of precordial TASER shocks in human subjects: A pilot study.
    Stopyra JP, Winslow JE, Fitzgerald DM, Bozeman WP.
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2017 Nov; 52():70-74. PubMed ID: 28866284
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. A comparative study of conducted electrical weapon incapacitation during a goal-directed task.
    Ho J, Dawes DM, Kunz SN, Satpathy R, Klein L, Driver B, Stang JL.
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2020 Dec; 16(4):613-621. PubMed ID: 32812174
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Immediate cardiovascular effects of the Taser X26 conducted electrical weapon.
    Bozeman WP, Barnes DG, Winslow JE, Johnson JC, Phillips CH, Alson R.
    Emerg Med J; 2009 Aug; 26(8):567-70. PubMed ID: 19625551
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. New conducted electrical weapons: Finite element modeling of safety margins.
    Panescu D, Kroll MW, Brave MA.
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul; 2017():2170-2176. PubMed ID: 29060327
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Absence of electrocardiographic change after prolonged application of a conducted electrical weapon in physically exhausted adults.
    Ho JD, Dawes DM, Heegaard WG, Calkins HG, Moscati RM, Miner JR.
    J Emerg Med; 2011 Nov; 41(5):466-72. PubMed ID: 19443165
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Transcardiac conducted electrical weapon (TASER) probe deployments: incidence and outcomes.
    Bozeman WP, Teacher E, Winslow JE.
    J Emerg Med; 2012 Dec; 43(6):970-5. PubMed ID: 22674039
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Human cardiovascular effects of a new generation conducted electrical weapon.
    Ho JD, Dawes DM, Reardon RF, Strote SR, Kunz SN, Nelson RS, Lundin EJ, Orozco BS, Miner JR.
    Forensic Sci Int; 2011 Jan 30; 204(1-3):50-7. PubMed ID: 20537475
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The physiologic effects of a new generation conducted electrical weapon on human volunteers at rest.
    Ho JD, Dawes DM, Kunz SN, Klein LR, Driver BE, DeVries PA, Jones GA, Stang JL.
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2020 Sep 30; 16(3):406-414. PubMed ID: 32388670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Presenting rhythm in sudden deaths temporally proximate to discharge of TASER conducted electrical weapons.
    Swerdlow CD, Fishbein MC, Chaman L, Lakkireddy DR, Tchou P.
    Acad Emerg Med; 2009 Aug 30; 16(8):726-39. PubMed ID: 19473120
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Confusion between firearms and electrical weapons as a factor in police shootings.
    Kroll MW, Melinek J, Martin JA, Brave MA, Williams HE.
    Forensic Sci Med Pathol; 2022 Sep 30; 18(3):280-287. PubMed ID: 35067809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Electrical safety of conducted electrical weapons relative to requirements of relevant electrical standards.
    Panescu D, Nerheim M, Kroll M.
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013 Sep 30; 2013():5342-7. PubMed ID: 24110943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. TASER CEW distance determination for models X26P, X2, and TASER 7.
    Zhou YR, Liscio E, Ruffo HE, Doucette CM, Cao W.
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Jan 30; 342():111520. PubMed ID: 36462472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Exposures to conducted electrical weapons (including TASER® devices): how many and for how long are acceptable?
    Jauchem JR.
    J Forensic Sci; 2015 Jan 30; 60 Suppl 1():S116-29. PubMed ID: 25443856
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A comparison of three conducted electrical weapons in a surrogate swine cardiac safety model.
    Dawes DM, Ho JD, Halperin HR, Fink SJ, Driver BE, Klein LR.
    J Forensic Leg Med; 2021 Jan 30; 77():102088. PubMed ID: 33242742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. New conducted electrical weapons: Electrical safety relative to relevant standards.
    Panescu D, Nerheim M, Kroll MW, Brave MA.
    Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2017 Jul 30; 2017():2185-2190. PubMed ID: 29060330
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. 15-Second conducted electrical weapon exposure does not cause core temperature elevation in non-environmentally stressed resting adults.
    Dawes DM, Ho JD, Johnson MA, Lundin E, Janchar TA, Miner JR.
    Forensic Sci Int; 2008 Apr 07; 176(2-3):253-7. PubMed ID: 17983716
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Prolonged TASER use on exhausted humans does not worsen markers of acidosis.
    Ho JD, Dawes DM, Bultman LL, Moscati RM, Janchar TA, Miner JR.
    Am J Emerg Med; 2009 May 07; 27(4):413-8. PubMed ID: 19555610
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Conducted electrical weapon use by law enforcement: an evaluation of safety and injury.
    Strote J, Walsh M, Angelidis M, Basta A, Hutson HR.
    J Trauma; 2010 May 07; 68(5):1239-46. PubMed ID: 20032795
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. 40-Hz square-wave stimulation requires less energy to produce muscle contraction: compared with the TASER® X26 conducted energy weapon.
    Comeaux JA, Jauchem JR, Cox DD, Crane CC, D'Andrea JA.
    J Forensic Sci; 2013 Jul 07; 58(4):1026-31. PubMed ID: 23682682
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.