These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
826 related items for PubMed ID: 27449060
1. Comparison of various molecular methods for rapid differentiation of intestinal bifidobacteria at the species, subspecies and strain level. Jarocki P, Podleśny M, Komoń-Janczara E, Kucharska J, Glibowska A, Targoński Z. BMC Microbiol; 2016 Jul 22; 16(1):159. PubMed ID: 27449060 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Identification of Bifidobacterium species using rep-PCR fingerprinting. Masco L, Huys G, Gevers D, Verbrugghen L, Swings J. Syst Appl Microbiol; 2003 Nov 22; 26(4):557-63. PubMed ID: 14666984 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficiency of PCR-based methods in discriminating Bifidobacterium longum ssp. longum and Bifidobacterium longum ssp. infantis strains of human origin. Srůtková D, Spanova A, Spano M, Dráb V, Schwarzer M, Kozaková H, Rittich B. J Microbiol Methods; 2011 Oct 22; 87(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 21756944 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Application of the methods of molecular systematics to classification and identification of bacteria of the genus Bifidobacterium]. Sidorenko AV, Novik GI, Akimov VN. Mikrobiologiia; 2008 Oct 22; 77(3):293-302. PubMed ID: 18683644 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Discrimination of probiotic Lactobacillus strains for poultry by repetitive sequenced-based PCR fingerprinting. Lee CM, Sieo CC, Cheah YK, Abdullah N, Ho YW. J Sci Food Agric; 2012 Feb 22; 92(3):660-6. PubMed ID: 21919004 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Contemporary nucleic acid-based molecular techniques for detection, identification, and characterization of Bifidobacterium. Mianzhi Y, Shah NP. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr; 2017 Mar 24; 57(5):987-1016. PubMed ID: 26565761 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of amplified ribosomal DNA restriction analysis (ARDRA) and species-specific PCR for identification of Bifidobacterium species. Krízová J, Spanová A, Rittich B. Syst Appl Microbiol; 2006 Jan 24; 29(1):36-44. PubMed ID: 16423654 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of culture-dependent and independent approaches to characterize fecal bifidobacteria and lactobacilli. Quartieri A, Simone M, Gozzoli C, Popovic M, D'Auria G, Amaretti A, Raimondi S, Rossi M. Anaerobe; 2016 Apr 24; 38():130-137. PubMed ID: 26481833 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison and evaluation of molecular methods used for identification and discrimination of lactic acid bacteria. Pál K, Szén O, Kiss A, Naár Z. J Sci Food Agric; 2012 Jul 24; 92(9):1931-6. PubMed ID: 22246719 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Rapid identification of human intestinal bifidobacteria by 16S rRNA-targeted species- and group-specific primers. Matsuki T, Watanabe K, Tanaka R, Oyaizu H. FEMS Microbiol Lett; 1998 Oct 15; 167(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 9809413 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. The effective differentiation of Salmonella isolates using four PCR-based typing methods. Hashemi A, Baghbani-Arani F. J Appl Microbiol; 2015 Jun 15; 118(6):1530-40. PubMed ID: 25809397 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]