These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
109 related items for PubMed ID: 27450602
1. Literature Evidence on Live Animal Versus Synthetic Models for Training and Assessing Trauma Resuscitation Procedures. Hart D, McNeil MA, Hegarty C, Rush R, Chipman J, Clinton J, Reihsen T, Sweet R. J Spec Oper Med; 2016; 16(2):44-51. PubMed ID: 27450602 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Training and Assessing Critical Airway, Breathing, and Hemorrhage Control Procedures for Trauma Care: Live Tissue Versus Synthetic Models. Hart D, Rush R, Rule G, Clinton J, Beilman G, Anders S, Brown R, McNeil MA, Reihsen T, Chipman J, Sweet R, University of Minnesota Combat Casualty Training Consortium (UMN CCTC). Acad Emerg Med; 2018 Feb; 25(2):148-167. PubMed ID: 29077240 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Cadaver-based training is superior to simulation training for cricothyrotomy and tube thoracostomy. Takayesu JK, Peak D, Stearns D. Intern Emerg Med; 2017 Feb; 12(1):99-102. PubMed ID: 27021389 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Randomized controlled trial comparing dynamic simulation with static simulation in trauma. Carden AJ, Salcedo ES, Leshikar DE, Utter GH, Wilson MD, Galante JM. J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2016 May; 80(5):748-53; discussion 753-4. PubMed ID: 26891156 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Feasibility of a perfused and ventilated cadaveric model for assessment of lifesaving traumatic hemorrhage and airway management skills. Reihsen TE, Alberti L, Speich J, Poniatowski LH, Hart D, Sweet RM. J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2016 May; 80(5):799-804. PubMed ID: 26891158 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Trauma Resuscitation Evaluation Times and Correlating Human Patient Simulation Training Differences-What is the Standard? Bonjour TJ, Charny G, Thaxton RE. Mil Med; 2016 Nov; 181(11):e1630-e1636. PubMed ID: 27849499 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Performance-based comparison of neonatal intubation training outcomes: simulator and live animal. Andreatta PB, Klotz JJ, Dooley-Hash SL, Hauptman JG, Biddinger B, House JB. Adv Neonatal Care; 2015 Feb; 15(1):56-64. PubMed ID: 25626982 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Global Collaboration to Modernize Advanced Trauma Life Support Training. Gala SG, Crandall ML. J Surg Educ; 2019 Feb; 76(2):487-496. PubMed ID: 30245060 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Endovascular Skills for Trauma and Resuscitative Surgery (ESTARS) course: curriculum development, content validation, and program assessment. Villamaria CY, Eliason JL, Napolitano LM, Stansfield RB, Spencer JR, Rasmussen TE. J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2014 Apr; 76(4):929-35; discussion 935-6. PubMed ID: 24662854 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Randomized objective comparison of live tissue training versus simulators for emergency procedures. Hall AB. Am Surg; 2011 May; 77(5):561-5. PubMed ID: 21679588 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. In situ, multidisciplinary, simulation-based teamwork training improves early trauma care. Steinemann S, Berg B, Skinner A, DiTulio A, Anzelon K, Terada K, Oliver C, Ho HC, Speck C. J Surg Educ; 2011 May; 68(6):472-7. PubMed ID: 22000533 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Training laypersons and hospital personnel in basic resuscitation techniques: an approach to impact the global trauma burden in Mozambique. Merchant A, Outhay M, Gonzaléz-Calvo L, Moon TD, Sidat M, Taibo CL, McQueen K. World J Surg; 2015 Jun; 39(6):1433-7. PubMed ID: 25663007 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A critical review of anaesthetised animal models and alternatives for military research, testing and training, with a focus on blast damage, haemorrhage and resuscitation. Combes RD. Altern Lab Anim; 2013 Nov; 41(5):385-415. PubMed ID: 24329746 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Systematic Review of Live Tissue Versus Simulation Education for Prehospital Trauma Providers. Goolsby C, Branting A, Ausman J, Williams D, Ausman C, David J, Allard R. Mil Med; 2017 Sep; 182(9):e1824-e1833. PubMed ID: 28885943 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of live tissue training and high-fidelity patient simulator: A pilot study in battlefield trauma training. Savage EC, Tenn C, Vartanian O, Blackler K, Sullivan-Kwantes W, Garrett M, Blais AR, Jarmasz J, Peng H, Pannell D, Tien HC. J Trauma Acute Care Surg; 2015 Oct; 79(4 Suppl 2):S157-63. PubMed ID: 26131783 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of self-efficacy and its improvement after artificial simulator or live animal model emergency procedure training. Hall AB, Riojas R, Sharon D. Mil Med; 2014 Mar; 179(3):320-3. PubMed ID: 24594468 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparing the standardized live trauma patient and the mechanical simulator models in the ATLS initial assessment station. Ali J, Dunn J, Eason M, Drumm J. J Surg Res; 2010 Jul; 162(1):7-10. PubMed ID: 20452620 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Objective comparison of animal training versus artificial simulation for initial cricothyroidotomy training. Iverson K, Riojas R, Sharon D, Hall AB. Am Surg; 2015 May; 81(5):515-8. PubMed ID: 25975338 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. A randomized controlled study of manikin simulator fidelity on neonatal resuscitation program learning outcomes. Curran V, Fleet L, White S, Bessell C, Deshpandey A, Drover A, Hayward M, Valcour J. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2015 Mar; 20(1):205-18. PubMed ID: 24916954 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A human cadaveric workshop: One solution to competence in the face of rarity. Ferguson IM, Shareef MZ, Burns B, Reid C. Emerg Med Australas; 2016 Dec; 28(6):752-754. PubMed ID: 27175920 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]