These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
184 related items for PubMed ID: 27454245
1. Binocular vision in infancy: Responsiveness to uncrossed horizontal disparity. Kavšek M, Braun SK. Infant Behav Dev; 2016 Aug; 44():219-26. PubMed ID: 27454245 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The onset of sensitivity to horizontal disparity in infancy: a short-term longitudinal study. Kavšek M. Infant Behav Dev; 2013 Jun; 36(3):329-43. PubMed ID: 23558013 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Perceptual enhancement of suprathreshold luminance modulation in stereoscopic patterns. Maehara G, Murakami I. J Vis; 2020 Nov 02; 20(12):8. PubMed ID: 33206127 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Occlusion contributes to temporal processing differences between crossed and uncrossed stereopsis in random-dot displays. Becker S, Bowd C, Shorter S, King K, Patterson R. Vision Res; 1999 Jan 02; 39(2):331-9. PubMed ID: 10326139 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Critical immaturities limiting infant binocular stereopsis. Brown AM, Lindsey DT, Satgunam P, Miracle JA. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2007 Mar 02; 48(3):1424-34. PubMed ID: 17325192 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Thresholds for sine-wave corrugations defined by binocular disparity in random dot stereograms: Factor analysis of individual differences reveals two stereoscopic mechanisms tuned for spatial frequency. Peterzell DH, Serrano-Pedraza I, Widdall M, Read JCA. Vision Res; 2017 Dec 02; 141():127-135. PubMed ID: 29155009 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Discrimination of the spatial derivatives of horizontal binocular disparity. Lunn PD, Morgan MJ. J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis; 1997 Feb 02; 14(2):360-71. PubMed ID: 9014355 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A reevaluation of the tolerance to vertical misalignment in stereopsis. Fukuda K, Wilcox LM, Allison RS, Howard IP. J Vis; 2009 Feb 05; 9(2):1.1-8. PubMed ID: 19271911 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Associated phoria in relation to stereopsis with random-dot stereograms. Jiménez JR, Olivares JL, Pérez-Ocón F, del Barco LJ. Optom Vis Sci; 2000 Jan 05; 77(1):47-50. PubMed ID: 10654858 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. [Binocular functional exploration: fundamental aspects and analysis by the Fusio-Test]. Bourdy C, Cottin F, James Y. J Fr Ophtalmol; 1988 Jan 05; 11(5):441-51. PubMed ID: 3057057 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Responses of primary visual cortical neurons to binocular disparity without depth perception. Cumming BG, Parker AJ. Nature; 1997 Sep 18; 389(6648):280-3. PubMed ID: 9305841 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Pooling signals from vertically and non-vertically orientation-tuned disparity mechanisms in human stereopsis. Patel SS, Bedell HE, Sampat P. Vision Res; 2006 Jan 18; 46(1-2):1-13. PubMed ID: 16129469 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Stereopsis and aging. Norman JF, Norman HF, Craft AE, Walton CL, Bartholomew AN, Burton CL, Wiesemann EY, Crabtree CE. Vision Res; 2008 Oct 18; 48(23-24):2456-65. PubMed ID: 18771680 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. The perceived visual direction of monocular objects in random-dot stereograms is influenced by perceived depth and allelotropia. Hariharan-Vilupuru S, Bedell HE. Vision Res; 2009 Jan 18; 49(2):190-201. PubMed ID: 18992271 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Influence of Test Distance on Stereoacuity in Intermittent Exotropia. Seki Y, Wakayama A, Takahashi R, Umebara I, Tanabe F, Abe K, Shimomura Y. Strabismus; 2017 Mar 18; 25(1):12-16. PubMed ID: 28156199 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]