These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1118 related items for PubMed ID: 27460314

  • 1. Effect of cement space on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM-fabricated monolithic zirconia crowns.
    Kale E, Seker E, Yilmaz B, Özcelik TB.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Dec; 116(6):890-895. PubMed ID: 27460314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Effect of fabrication stages and cementation on the marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns.
    Kale E, Yilmaz B, Seker E, Özcelik TB.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Dec; 118(6):736-741. PubMed ID: 28434679
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Marginal fit of CAD-CAM monolithic zirconia crowns fabricated by using cone beam computed tomography scans.
    Kale E, Cilli M, Özçelik TB, Yilmaz B.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2020 May; 123(5):731-737. PubMed ID: 31653403
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. In vitro evaluation of marginal discrepancy of monolithic zirconia restorations fabricated with different CAD-CAM systems.
    Hamza TA, Sherif RM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Jun; 117(6):762-766. PubMed ID: 27836145
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. An in vitro evaluation of marginal fit zirconia crowns fabricated by a CAD-CAM dental laboratory and a milling center.
    Meirowitz A, Bitterman Y, Levy S, Mijiritsky E, Dolev E.
    BMC Oral Health; 2019 Jun 13; 19(1):103. PubMed ID: 31196041
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Marginal Adaptation of Provisional CAD/CAM Restorations Fabricated Using Various Simulated Digital Cement Space Settings.
    Özçelik TB, Yilmaz B, Şeker E, Shah K.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2018 Jun 13; 33(5):1064-1069. PubMed ID: 30231093
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Effect of cementation and aging on the marginal fit of veneered and monolithic zirconia and metal-ceramic CAD-CAM crowns.
    Del Piñal M, Lopez-Suarez C, Bartolome JF, Volpato CA, Suarez MJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2021 Feb 13; 125(2):323.e1-323.e7. PubMed ID: 33176924
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of marginal fit between CAD-CAM and hot-press lithium disilicate crowns.
    Dolev E, Bitterman Y, Meirowitz A.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2019 Jan 13; 121(1):124-128. PubMed ID: 29961628
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B, Alshahrani FA, Kale E, Johnston WM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul 13; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Marginal discrepancy of monolithic and veneered all-ceramic crowns on titanium and zirconia implant abutments before and after adhesive cementation: a scanning electron microscopy analysis.
    Martinez-Rus F, Ferreiroa A, Ozcan M, Pradies G.
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013 Jul 13; 28(2):480-7. PubMed ID: 23527350
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Clinical outcomes of three different crown systems with CAD/CAM technology.
    Batson ER, Cooper LF, Duqum I, Mendonça G.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Oct 13; 112(4):770-7. PubMed ID: 24980739
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Influence of Different CAM Strategies on the Fit of Partial Crown Restorations: A Digital Three-dimensional Evaluation.
    Zimmermann M, Valcanaia A, Neiva G, Mehl A, Fasbinder D.
    Oper Dent; 2018 Oct 13; 43(5):530-538. PubMed ID: 29630483
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. A comparison of the marginal fit of crowns fabricated with digital and conventional methods.
    Ng J, Ruse D, Wyatt C.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep 13; 112(3):555-60. PubMed ID: 24630399
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Marginal and Internal Fit of CAD/CAM Crowns Fabricated Over Reverse Tapered Preparations.
    Carbajal Mejía JB, Yatani H, Wakabayashi K, Nakamura T.
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb 13; 28(2):e477-e484. PubMed ID: 29194841
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Digital evaluation of the fit of zirconia-reinforced lithium silicate crowns with a new three-dimensional approach.
    Zimmermann M, Valcanaia A, Neiva G, Mehl A, Fasbinder D.
    Quintessence Int; 2018 Feb 13; 49(1):9-15. PubMed ID: 29192293
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. In vitro fit of CAD-CAM complete arch screw-retained titanium and zirconia implant prostheses fabricated on 4 implants.
    Al-Meraikhi H, Yilmaz B, McGlumphy E, Brantley W, Johnston WM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar 13; 119(3):409-416. PubMed ID: 28720339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Evaluation of marginal and internal fit of lithium disilicate CAD-CAM crowns with different finish lines by using a micro-CT technique.
    Rizonaki M, Jacquet W, Bottenberg P, Depla L, Boone M, De Coster PJ.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 Jun 13; 127(6):890-898. PubMed ID: 33541816
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Three-Dimensional Digital Evaluation of the Fit of Endocrowns Fabricated from Different CAD/CAM Materials.
    Zimmermann M, Valcanaia A, Neiva G, Mehl A, Fasbinder D.
    J Prosthodont; 2019 Feb 13; 28(2):e504-e509. PubMed ID: 29508488
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Marginal discrepancy of CAD-CAM complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
    Yilmaz B, Kale E, Johnston WM.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul 13; 120(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 29475755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Influence of scanner, powder application, and adjustments on CAD-CAM crown misfit.
    Prudente MS, Davi LR, Nabbout KO, Prado CJ, Pereira LM, Zancopé K, Neves FD.
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Mar 13; 119(3):377-383. PubMed ID: 28689912
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 56.