These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
2. Fetal weight estimation in gestational diabetic pregnancies: comparison between conventional and three-dimensional fractional thigh volume methods using gestation-adjusted projection. Pagani G, Palai N, Zatti S, Fratelli N, Prefumo F, Frusca T. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2014 Jan; 43(1):72-6. PubMed ID: 23494762 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Prediction of fetal macrosomia using two-dimensional and three-dimensional ultrasound. Mazzone E, Dall'Asta A, Kiener AJO, Carpano MG, Suprani A, Ghi T, Frusca T. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Dec; 243():26-31. PubMed ID: 31670065 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of 2- and 3-Dimensional Sonography for Estimation of Birth Weight and Neonatal Adiposity in the Setting of Suspected Fetal Macrosomia. Gibson KS, Stetzer B, Catalano PM, Myers SA. J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Jun; 35(6):1123-9. PubMed ID: 27091915 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Sonographic prediction of macrosomia in pregnancies complicated by maternal diabetes: finding the best formula. Shmueli A, Salman L, Hadar E, Aviram A, Bardin R, Ashwal E, Gabbay-Benziv R. Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2019 Jan; 299(1):97-103. PubMed ID: 30327863 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Fetal weight estimation in diabetic pregnancies using the gestation-adjusted projection method: comparison of two timing strategies for third-trimester sonography. Moore GS, Post AL, West NA, Hart JE, Lynch AM. J Ultrasound Med; 2015 Jun; 34(6):971-5. PubMed ID: 26014315 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Sonographic fetal weight estimation in prolonged pregnancy: comparative study of two- and three-dimensional methods. Lindell G, Marsál K. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 33(3):295-300. PubMed ID: 19180582 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Prediction of large-for-gestational age at 36 weeks' gestation: two-dimensional ultrasound vs three-dimensional ultrasound vs magnetic resonance imaging. Mazzone E, Kadji C, Cannie MM, Badr DA, Jani JC. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Apr; 63(4):489-496. PubMed ID: 37725758 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimized Sonographic Weight Estimation of Fetuses over 3500 g Using Biometry-Guided Formula Selection. Balsyte D, Schäffer L, Zimmermann R, Kurmanavicius J, Burkhardt T. Ultraschall Med; 2017 Jan; 38(1):60-64. PubMed ID: 26422668 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of macrosomia by serial sonographic measurements of fetal soft-tissues and the liver in women with pregestational diabetes. Garabedian C, Vambergue A, Salleron J, Deruelle P. Diabetes Metab; 2013 Dec; 39(6):511-8. PubMed ID: 23643348 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Ultrasonographic Fetal Weight Estimation: Should Macrosomia-Specific Formulas Be Utilized? Porter B, Neely C, Szychowski J, Owen J. Am J Perinatol; 2015 Aug; 32(10):968-72. PubMed ID: 25730134 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated Fractional Limb Volume Measurements Improve the Precision of Birth Weight Predictions in Late Third-Trimester Fetuses. Mack LM, Kim SY, Lee S, Sangi-Haghpeykar H, Lee W. J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Aug; 36(8):1649-1655. PubMed ID: 28439966 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Fetal magnetic resonance imaging at 36 weeks predicts neonatal macrosomia: the PREMACRO study. Kadji C, Cannie MM, Kang X, Carlin A, Benjou Etchoua S, Resta S, Dütemeyer V, Abi-Khalil F, Mazzone E, Bevilacqua E, Jani JC. Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Feb; 226(2):238.e1-238.e12. PubMed ID: 34358479 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Prediction of large for gestational age birth weights in diabetic mothers based on early third-trimester sonography. Nelson L, Wharton B, Grobman WA. J Ultrasound Med; 2011 Dec; 30(12):1625-8. PubMed ID: 22123996 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Different formulas, different thresholds and different performance-the prediction of macrosomia by ultrasound. Aviram A, Yogev Y, Ashwal E, Hiersch L, Danon D, Hadar E, Gabbay-Benziv R. J Perinatol; 2017 Dec; 37(12):1285-1291. PubMed ID: 28906497 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prenatal prediction of postnatal large-for-dates neonates using a simplified MRI method: comparison with conventional 2D ultrasound estimates. Kadji C, Cannie MM, De Angelis R, Camus M, Klass M, Fellas S, Cecotti V, Dütemeyer V, Jani JC. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Aug; 52(2):250-257. PubMed ID: 28508549 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Diagnostic accuracy of modified Hadlock formula for fetal macrosomia in women with gestational diabetes and pregnancy weight gain above recommended. Lovrić B, Šijanović S, Lešin J, Juras J. J Perinat Med; 2021 Sep 27; 49(7):907-914. PubMed ID: 33861027 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Screening efficacy of the subcutaneous tissue width/femur length ratio for fetal macrosomia in the non-diabetic pregnancy. Rotmensch S, Celentano C, Liberati M, Malinger G, Sadan O, Bellati U, Glezerman M. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 1999 May 27; 13(5):340-4. PubMed ID: 10380299 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Fetal Weight Estimation Using Automated Fractional Limb Volume With 2-Dimensional Size Parameters in Diabetic Pregnancies. Lee W, Mack LM, Gandhi R, Sangi-Haghpeykar H. J Ultrasound Med; 2021 Feb 27; 40(2):279-284. PubMed ID: 32710582 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Sonographic EFW and macrosomia: is there an optimum formula to predict diabetic fetal macrosomia? Combs CA, Rosenn B, Miodovnik M, Siddiqi TA. J Matern Fetal Med; 2000 Feb 27; 9(1):55-61. PubMed ID: 10757437 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]