These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
309 related items for PubMed ID: 27472905
1. Comparison of total-etch, self-etch, and selective etching techniques on class V composite restorations prepared by Er:YAG laser and bur: a scanning electron microscopy study. Ozel E, Tuna EB, Firatli S, Firatli E. Microsc Res Tech; 2016 Oct; 79(10):998-1004. PubMed ID: 27472905 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Microleakage and scanning electron microscopy evaluation of all-in-one self-etch adhesives and their respective nanocomposites prepared by erbium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser and bur. Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Attar N, Bicer CO, Firatli E. Lasers Med Sci; 2010 Jul; 25(4):493-502. PubMed ID: 19396579 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effect of different parameters of Er:YAG laser irradiations on class V composite restorations: A scanning electron microscopy study. Ozel E, Tuna EB, Firatli S, Firatli E. Scanning; 2016 Sep; 38(5):434-441. PubMed ID: 26750663 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Microleakage of Er:YAG laser and dental bur prepared cavities in primary teeth restored with different adhesive restorative materials. Baghalian A, Nakhjavani YB, Hooshmand T, Motahhary P, Bahramian H. Lasers Med Sci; 2013 Nov; 28(6):1453-60. PubMed ID: 23135785 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Leakage pathway of different nano-restorative materials in class V cavities prepared by Er:YAG laser and bur preparation. Ozel E, Korkmaz Y, Attar N, Bicer CO, Firatli E. Photomed Laser Surg; 2009 Oct; 27(5):783-9. PubMed ID: 19754249 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. The effects of cavity-filling techniques on microleakage in class II resin restorations prepared with Er:YAG laser and diamond bur: A scanning electron microscopy study. Ozel E, Tuna EB, Firatli E. Scanning; 2016 Sep; 38(5):389-395. PubMed ID: 26538487 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after conventional and Er:YAG laser preparation. Delme KI, Deman PJ, De Moor RJ. J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Sep; 32(9):676-85. PubMed ID: 16102081 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Microleakage of Self-Etch Adhesive System in Class V Cavities Prepared by Using Er:YAG Laser with Different Pulse Modes. Phanombualert J, Chimtim P, Heebthamai T, Weera-Archakul W. Photomed Laser Surg; 2015 Sep; 33(9):467-72. PubMed ID: 26270129 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Microleakage of class V resin composite restorations after bur, air-abrasion or Er:YAG laser preparation. Corona SA, Borsatto M, Dibb RG, Ramos RP, Brugnera A, Pécora JD. Oper Dent; 2001 Sep; 26(5):491-7. PubMed ID: 11551014 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Cavity preparation devices: effect on microleakage of Class V resin-based composite restorations. Setien VJ, Cobb DS, Denehy GE, Vargas MA. Am J Dent; 2001 Jun; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 11572294 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. [Marginal microleakage of cavities prepared with Er:YAG laser on primary teeth in vitro]. Xie Y, Zhang S, Ge LH. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2014 Jun 18; 46(3):474-7. PubMed ID: 24943032 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. In vitro study of enamel and dentin marginal integrity of composite and compomer restorations placed in primary teeth after diamond or Er:YAG laser cavity preparation. Stiesch-Scholz M, Hannig M. J Adhes Dent; 2000 Jun 18; 2(3):213-22. PubMed ID: 11317395 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Microleakage of composite resin restorations in cervical cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser radiation. Shahabi S, Ebrahimpour L, Walsh LJ. Aust Dent J; 2008 Jun 18; 53(2):172-5. PubMed ID: 18494974 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Microleakage of class V cavities with different adhesive systems prepared by a diamond instrument and different parameters of Er:YAG laser irradiation. Attar N, Korkmaz Y, Ozel E, Bicer CO, Firatli E. Photomed Laser Surg; 2008 Dec 18; 26(6):585-91. PubMed ID: 19099387 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Microleakage study of different adhesive systems in Class V cavities prepared by Er,Cr:YSGG laser and bur preparation. Ergucu Z, Celik EU, Turkun M. Gen Dent; 2007 Dec 18; 55(1):27-32. PubMed ID: 17333962 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of Tooth Preparation via Er:YAG Laser and Bur on Microleakage of Dentin Adhesives. Bahrololoomi Z, Heydari E. J Dent (Tehran); 2014 Mar 18; 11(2):172-8. PubMed ID: 24910693 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. In vitro comparison of microleakage of posterior resin composites with and without liner using two-step etch-and-rinse and self-etch dentin adhesive systems. Kasraei S, Azarsina M, Majidi S. Oper Dent; 2011 Mar 18; 36(2):213-21. PubMed ID: 21702678 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Microleakage of compomer restorations in primary teeth after preparation with bur or air abrasion. Aysegül O, Nurhan O, Haluk B, Dilek T. Oper Dent; 2005 Mar 18; 30(2):164-9. PubMed ID: 15853100 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser Handpieces for Class II Preparation and Microleakage of Silorane- or Methacrylate-Based Composite Restorations. Ergin E, Oz FD, Gurgan S. Photomed Laser Surg; 2018 Sep 18; 36(9):499-505. PubMed ID: 30188252 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. A Comparative Study of Cervical Composite Restorations Microleakage Using Dental Universal Bonding and Two-step Self-etch Adhesive. Fathpour K, Bazazzade A, Mirmohammadi H. J Contemp Dent Pract; 2021 Sep 01; 22(9):1035-1040. PubMed ID: 35000949 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]