These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
112 related items for PubMed ID: 27475149
1. Robustness against distortion of fundamental frequency cues in simulated electro-acoustic hearing. Vermeulen A, Verschuur C. J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jul; 140(1):229. PubMed ID: 27475149 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Human Frequency Following Responses to Vocoded Speech. Ananthakrishnan S, Luo X, Krishnan A. Ear Hear; 2017 Jul; 38(5):e256-e267. PubMed ID: 28362674 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Beneficial acoustic speech cues for cochlear implant users with residual acoustic hearing. Visram AS, Azadpour M, Kluk K, McKay CM. J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 May; 131(5):4042-50. PubMed ID: 22559377 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. [Simulation of speech perception with cochlear implants : Influence of frequency and level of fundamental frequency components with electronic acoustic stimulation]. Rader T, Fastl H, Baumann U. HNO; 2017 Mar; 65(3):237-242. PubMed ID: 27670421 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Does acoustic fundamental frequency information enhance cochlear implant performance? Mulhern L, Cullington H. Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Mar; 15(2):101-8. PubMed ID: 24597637 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of age on F0 discrimination and intonation perception in simulated electric and electroacoustic hearing. Souza P, Arehart K, Miller CW, Muralimanohar RK. Ear Hear; 2011 Feb; 32(1):75-83. PubMed ID: 20739892 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. The role of first formant information in simulated electro-acoustic hearing. Verschuur C, Boland C, Frost E, Constable J. J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jun; 133(6):4279-89. PubMed ID: 23742378 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Spatial Release From Masking in Simulated Cochlear Implant Users With and Without Access to Low-Frequency Acoustic Hearing. Williges B, Dietz M, Hohmann V, Jürgens T. Trends Hear; 2015 Dec 30; 19():. PubMed ID: 26721918 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech Perception With Combined Electric-Acoustic Stimulation: A Simulation and Model Comparison. Rader T, Adel Y, Fastl H, Baumann U. Ear Hear; 2015 Dec 30; 36(6):e314-25. PubMed ID: 25989069 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing. Zamaninezhad L, Hohmann V, Büchner A, Schädler MR, Jürgens T. Hear Res; 2017 Feb 30; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Children With Normal Hearing Are Efficient Users of Fundamental Frequency and Vocal Tract Length Cues for Voice Discrimination. Zaltz Y, Goldsworthy RL, Eisenberg LS, Kishon-Rabin L. Ear Hear; 2020 Feb 30; 41(1):182-193. PubMed ID: 31107364 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of cooperating and conflicting cues on speech intonation recognition by cochlear implant users and normal hearing listeners. Peng SC, Lu N, Chatterjee M. Audiol Neurootol; 2009 Feb 30; 14(5):327-37. PubMed ID: 19372651 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Low-frequency speech cues and simulated electric-acoustic hearing. Brown CA, Bacon SP. J Acoust Soc Am; 2009 Mar 30; 125(3):1658-65. PubMed ID: 19275323 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]