These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

497 related items for PubMed ID: 27492435

  • 1. Prediction of hip osteoporosis by DXA using a novel pulse-echo ultrasound device.
    Schousboe JT, Riekkinen O, Karjalainen J.
    Osteoporos Int; 2017 Jan; 28(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 27492435
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. New method for point-of-care osteoporosis screening and diagnostics.
    Karjalainen JP, Riekkinen O, Töyräs J, Jurvelin JS, Kröger H.
    Osteoporos Int; 2016 Mar; 27(3):971-977. PubMed ID: 26556741
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Pulse-echo ultrasound method for detection of post-menopausal women with osteoporotic BMD.
    Karjalainen JP, Riekkinen O, Kröger H.
    Osteoporos Int; 2018 May; 29(5):1193-1199. PubMed ID: 29460101
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Multi-site bone ultrasound measurements in elderly women with and without previous hip fractures.
    Karjalainen JP, Riekkinen O, Töyräs J, Hakulinen M, Kröger H, Rikkonen T, Salovaara K, Jurvelin JS.
    Osteoporos Int; 2012 Apr; 23(4):1287-95. PubMed ID: 21656263
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Automated DXA-based finite element analysis for hip fracture risk stratification: a cross-sectional study.
    Yang S, Leslie WD, Luo Y, Goertzen AL, Ahmed S, Ward LM, Delubac I, Lix LM.
    Osteoporos Int; 2018 Jan; 29(1):191-200. PubMed ID: 29038836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Pulse-echo Ultrasound Identifies Caucasian and Hispanic Women at Risk for Osteoporosis.
    Lewiecki EM.
    J Clin Densitom; 2021 Jan; 24(2):175-182. PubMed ID: 32527649
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Device-specific thresholds to diagnose osteoporosis at the proximal femur: an approach to interpreting peripheral bone measurements in clinical practice.
    Clowes JA, Peel NF, Eastell R.
    Osteoporos Int; 2006 Jan; 17(9):1293-302. PubMed ID: 16810454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Quantitative ultrasound of the tibia depends on both cortical density and thickness.
    Prevrhal S, Fuerst T, Fan B, Njeh C, Hans D, Uffmann M, Srivastav S, Genant HK.
    Osteoporos Int; 2001 Jan; 12(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 11305080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [Bone mineral density in postmenopausal women with proximal femoral fractures--comparative study between quantitative ultrasonometry and gold standard DXA].
    Schnabel M, Eser G, Ziller V, Mann D, Mann E, Hadji P.
    Zentralbl Chir; 2005 Oct; 130(5):469-75. PubMed ID: 16220445
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The utility of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, calcaneal quantitative ultrasound, and fracture risk indices (FRAX® and Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument) for the identification of women with distal forearm or hip fractures: A pilot study.
    Esmaeilzadeh S, Cesme F, Oral A, Yaliman A, Sindel D.
    Endocr Res; 2016 Aug; 41(3):248-60. PubMed ID: 26864472
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Bone Mineral Density and Cortical-Bone Thickness of the Distal Radius Predict Femoral Stem Subsidence in Postmenopausal Women.
    Nazari-Farsani S, Vuopio ME, Aro HT.
    J Arthroplasty; 2020 Jul; 35(7):1877-1884.e1. PubMed ID: 32205004
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Reproducibility and diagnostic sensitivity of ultrasonometry of the phalanges to assess osteoporosis.
    Reginster JY, Dethor M, Pirenne H, Dewe W, Albert A.
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 1998 Oct; 63(1):21-8. PubMed ID: 9849707
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Does the combination of quantitative ultrasound and dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry improve fracture discrimination?
    Frost ML, Blake GM, Fogelman I.
    Osteoporos Int; 2001 Oct; 12(6):471-7. PubMed ID: 11446563
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of Speed of Sound Measures Assessed by Multisite Quantitative Ultrasound to Bone Mineral Density Measures Assessed by Dual-Energy X-Ray Absorptiometry in a Large Canadian Cohort: the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos).
    Olszynski WP, Adachi JD, Hanley DA, Davison KS, Brown JP.
    J Clin Densitom; 2016 Oct; 19(2):234-41. PubMed ID: 26050876
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Comparisons of noninvasive bone mineral measurements in assessing age-related loss, fracture discrimination, and diagnostic classification.
    Grampp S, Genant HK, Mathur A, Lang P, Jergas M, Takada M, Glüer CC, Lu Y, Chavez M.
    J Bone Miner Res; 1997 May; 12(5):697-711. PubMed ID: 9144335
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Correlation of plain radiographic indices of the hip with quantitative bone mineral density.
    Sah AP, Thornhill TS, LeBoff MS, Glowacki J.
    Osteoporos Int; 2007 Aug; 18(8):1119-26. PubMed ID: 17340218
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Osteoporosis in adults with cerebral palsy: feasibility of DXA screening and risk factors for low bone density.
    Marciniak C, Gabet J, Lee J, Ma M, Brander K, Wysocki N.
    Osteoporos Int; 2016 Apr; 27(4):1477-1484. PubMed ID: 26576540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Device-specific weighted T-score for two quantitative ultrasounds: operational propositions for the management of osteoporosis for 65 years and older women in Switzerland.
    Hans D, Hartl F, Krieg MA.
    Osteoporos Int; 2003 May; 14(3):251-8. PubMed ID: 12730788
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 25.