These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

339 related items for PubMed ID: 27519925

  • 41. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem responses in cochlear implant patients.
    Kasper A, Pelizzone M, Montandon P.
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 1992; 54(6):285-94. PubMed ID: 1475097
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Evaluation of evoked potentials to dyadic tones after cochlear implantation.
    Sandmann P, Eichele T, Buechler M, Debener S, Jäncke L, Dillier N, Hugdahl K, Meyer M.
    Brain; 2009 Jul; 132(Pt 7):1967-79. PubMed ID: 19293240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43. [Using the Mongolian gerbil (Meriones unguiculatus) as an animal model in ontogenetic cochlear implant research].
    Hessel H, Ernst S, Mickenhagen A, Dück M, von Wedel H, Walger M.
    HNO; 2000 Mar; 48(3):209-14. PubMed ID: 10768112
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Development of a novel eighth-nerve intraneural auditory neuroprosthesis.
    Badi AN, Kertesz TR, Gurgel RK, Shelton C, Normann RA.
    Laryngoscope; 2003 May; 113(5):833-42. PubMed ID: 12792319
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45. Using evoked potentials to match interaural electrode pairs with bilateral cochlear implants.
    Smith ZM, Delgutte B.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2007 Mar; 8(1):134-51. PubMed ID: 17225976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Evoked potentials from the auditory nerve following sinusoidal electrical stimulation of the cochlea: new possibilities for preoperative testing in cochlear-implant candidates?
    Hartmann R, Pfennigdorff T, Klinke R.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 1994 Sep; 114(5):495-500. PubMed ID: 7825430
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48. Chronic neurotrophin delivery promotes ectopic neurite growth from the spiral ganglion of deafened cochleae without compromising the spatial selectivity of cochlear implants.
    Landry TG, Fallon JB, Wise AK, Shepherd RK.
    J Comp Neurol; 2013 Aug 15; 521(12):2818-32. PubMed ID: 23436344
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50. Auditory brainstem activity in children with 9-30 months of bilateral cochlear implant use.
    Gordon KA, Valero J, Papsin BC.
    Hear Res; 2007 Nov 15; 233(1-2):97-107. PubMed ID: 17850999
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Plasticity of tonotopic maps in humans: influence of hearing loss, hearing aids and cochlear implants.
    Thai-Van H, Veuillet E, Norena A, Guiraud J, Collet L.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Mar 15; 130(3):333-7. PubMed ID: 19845491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Envelope enhancement increases cortical sensitivity to interaural envelope delays with acoustic and electric hearing.
    Hartley DE, Isaiah A.
    PLoS One; 2014 Mar 15; 9(8):e104097. PubMed ID: 25093417
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54. Electrical stimulation of the auditory pathway in deaf patients following acoustic neurinoma surgery and initial results with a new auditory brainstem implant system.
    Mueller J, Behr R, Knaus C, Milewski C, Schoen F, Helms J.
    Adv Otorhinolaryngol; 2000 Mar 15; 57():229-35. PubMed ID: 11892155
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. Plastic changes in the auditory cortex of congenitally deaf cats following cochlear implantation.
    Klinke R, Hartmann R, Heid S, Tillein J, Kral A.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001 Mar 15; 6(4):203-6. PubMed ID: 11694728
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Cochlear implant electrode configuration effects on activation threshold and tonotopic selectivity.
    Snyder RL, Middlebrooks JC, Bonham BH.
    Hear Res; 2008 Jan 15; 235(1-2):23-38. PubMed ID: 18037252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57. Single-incision cochlear implantation and hearing evaluation in piglets and minipigs.
    Yildiz E, Gerlitz M, Gadenstaetter AJ, Landegger LD, Nieratschker M, Schum D, Schmied M, Haase A, Kanz F, Kramer AM, Glueckert R, Staecker H, Honeder C, Arnoldner C.
    Hear Res; 2022 Dec 15; 426():108644. PubMed ID: 36343533
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58. Single-sided deafness leads to unilateral aural preference within an early sensitive period.
    Kral A, Hubka P, Heid S, Tillein J.
    Brain; 2013 Jan 15; 136(Pt 1):180-93. PubMed ID: 23233722
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Delayed Auditory Brainstem Responses in Prelingually Deaf and Late-Implanted Cochlear Implant Users.
    Lammers MJ, van Eijl RH, van Zanten GA, Versnel H, Grolman W.
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2015 Oct 15; 16(5):669-78. PubMed ID: 26162414
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60. Electrophysiological properties of cochlear implantation in the gerbil using a flexible array.
    DeMason C, Choudhury B, Ahmad F, Fitzpatrick DC, Wang J, Buchman CA, Adunka OF.
    Ear Hear; 2012 Oct 15; 33(4):534-42. PubMed ID: 22436408
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 17.