These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
461 related items for PubMed ID: 27523460
21. Mini-aortic surgery with percutaneous cannulation and rapid-deployment valve. Bruno P, Farina P, Cammertoni F, Biondi R, Perri G, Di Cesare A, Crea F, Massetti M. Asian Cardiovasc Thorac Ann; 2016 Jul; 24(6):535-40. PubMed ID: 27286783 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. Full sternotomy and minimal access approaches for surgical aortic valve replacement: a multicentre propensity-matched study. Paparella D, Malvindi PG, Santarpino G, Moscarelli M, Guida P, Fattouch K, Margari V, Martinelli L, Albertini A, Speziale G. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2020 Apr 01; 57(4):709-716. PubMed ID: 31647535 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Aortic and mitral valve surgery on the beating heart is lowering cardiopulmonary bypass and aortic cross clamp time. Gersak B, Sutlic Z. Heart Surg Forum; 2002 Apr 01; 5(2):182-6. PubMed ID: 12125670 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. A need for speed? Bypass time and outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement surgery. Chalmers J, Pullan M, Mediratta N, Poullis M. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2014 Jul 01; 19(1):21-6. PubMed ID: 24722513 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Is the femoral cannulation for minimally invasive aortic valve replacement necessary? Cuenca J, Rodriguez-Delgadillo MA, Valle JV, Campos V, Herrera JM, Rodriguez F, Portela F, Sorribas F, Juffe A. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1998 Oct 01; 14 Suppl 1():S111-4. PubMed ID: 9814804 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Propensity matched analysis of minimally invasive versus conventional isolated aortic valve replacement. Oo S, Khan A, Chan J, Juneja S, Caputo M, Angelini G, Rajakaruna C, Vohra HA. Perfusion; 2023 Mar 01; 38(2):261-269. PubMed ID: 34515578 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Ministernotomy versus full sternotomy aortic valve replacement with a sutureless bioprosthesis: a multicenter study. Dalén M, Biancari F, Rubino AS, Santarpino G, De Praetere H, Kasama K, Juvonen T, Deste W, Pollari F, Meuris B, Fischlein T, Mignosa C, Gatti G, Pappalardo A, Sartipy U, Svenarud P. Ann Thorac Surg; 2015 Feb 01; 99(2):524-30. PubMed ID: 25483001 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Minimally Invasive Endoscopic Aortic Valve Replacement: Operative Results. Cresce GD, Sella M, Hinna Danesi T, Favaro A, Salvador L. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Feb 01; 32(3):416-423. PubMed ID: 31972301 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. [L-shaped Partial Upper Sternotomy Approach for Aortic Valve Replacement]. Munakata H, Oyama N, Murakami Y, Yamazato T, Abe N, Mabuni K, Kugai T. Kyobu Geka; 2017 Feb 01; 70(2):83-90. PubMed ID: 28174400 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. A propensity-score matched analysis on the impact of postoperative atrial fibrillation on the early and late outcomes after concomitant aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Saxena A, Shi WY, Paramanathan A, Herle P, Dinh D, Smith JA, Reid CM, Shardey G, Newcomb AE. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown); 2014 Mar 01; 15(3):199-206. PubMed ID: 24572338 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Minimal access versus conventional aortic valve replacement: a meta-analysis of propensity-matched studies. Shehada SE, Elhmidi Y, Mourad F, Wendt D, El Gabry M, Benedik J, Thielmann M, Jakob H. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2017 Oct 01; 25(4):624-632. PubMed ID: 28962507 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. Haemodynamic benefits of rapid deployment aortic valve replacement via a minimally invasive approach: 1-year results of a prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial. Borger MA, Dohmen PM, Knosalla C, Hammerschmidt R, Merk DR, Richter M, Doenst T, Conradi L, Treede H, Moustafine V, Holzhey DM, Duhay F, Strauch J. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2016 Oct 01; 50(4):713-720. PubMed ID: 26935407 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Early-Term Results of Rapid-Deployment Aortic Valve Replacement versus Standard Bioprosthesis Implantation Combined with Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting. Taghiyev ZT, Bechtel M, Schlömicher M, Useini D, Taghi HN, Moustafine V, Strauch JT. Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2023 Oct 01; 71(7):519-527. PubMed ID: 35151232 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Do we increase the operative risk by adding the Cox Maze III procedure to aortic valve replacement and coronary artery bypass surgery? Ad N, Henry L, Hunt S, Holmes SD. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Apr 01; 143(4):936-44. PubMed ID: 22244503 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Minimally invasive aortic valve replacement provides equivalent outcomes at reduced cost compared with conventional aortic valve replacement: A real-world multi-institutional analysis. Ghanta RK, Lapar DJ, Kern JA, Kron IL, Speir AM, Fonner E, Quader M, Ailawadi G. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Apr 01; 149(4):1060-5. PubMed ID: 25680751 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Aortic valve replacement with or without concomitant coronary artery bypass grafting in very elderly patients aged 85 years and older. Takagi K, Arinaga K, Takaseya T, Otsuka H, Shojima T, Shintani Y, Zaima Y, Saku K, Oryoji A, Hiromatsu S. Heart Vessels; 2020 Oct 01; 35(10):1409-1418. PubMed ID: 32394242 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. Reoperative aortic valve replacement in the octogenarians-minimally invasive technique in the era of transcatheter valve replacement. Kaneko T, Loberman D, Gosev I, Rassam F, McGurk S, Leacche M, Cohn L. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2014 Jan 01; 147(1):155-62. PubMed ID: 24183906 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Early outcomes after isolated aortic valve replacement with rapid deployment aortic valve. Wahlers TC, Haverich A, Borger MA, Shrestha M, Kocher AA, Walther T, Roth M, Misfeld M, Mohr FW, Kempfert J, Dohmen PM, Schmitz C, Rahmanian P, Wiedemann D, Duhay FG, Laufer G. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Jun 01; 151(6):1639-47. PubMed ID: 26892076 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Mini-sternotomy aortic valve replacement: is it safe and effective? Comparison with standard techniques. Mahesh B, Navaratnarajah M, Mensah K, Ilsley C, Amrani M. J Heart Valve Dis; 2011 Nov 01; 20(6):650-6. PubMed ID: 22655495 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Use of Adjuncts Reduces Cardiopulmonary Bypass Time During Minimally Invasive Aortic Valve Replacement. Wang A, McCartney SL, Williams JB, Ganapathi A, Glower DD, Nicoara A, Gaca JG. J Heart Valve Dis; 2017 Mar 01; 26(2):155-160. PubMed ID: 28820544 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]