These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
144 related items for PubMed ID: 2753999
1. Efficacy of duplicate genital specimens and repeated testing for confirming positive results for chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigen. Kellogg JA, Seiple JW, Levisky JS. J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Jun; 27(6):1218-21. PubMed ID: 2753999 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of endocervical specimen quality on detection of Chlamydia trachomatis and on the incidence of false-positive results with the Chlamydiazyme method. Kellogg JA, Seiple JW, Murray CL, Levisky JS. J Clin Microbiol; 1990 Jun; 28(6):1108-13. PubMed ID: 2199483 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of first-voided urine specimens with endocervical swab specimens for enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in women. Kellogg JA, Vanderhoff BT, Seiple JW, Hick ME. Arch Fam Med; 1994 Aug; 3(8):672-5. PubMed ID: 7952252 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Use of chlamydiazyme for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genital infections. Monno R, De Vito D, Vena GA, Mosca A, Miragliotta G. Microbiologica; 1987 Oct; 10(4):421-5. PubMed ID: 3320688 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of cytobrushes with swabs for recovery of endocervical cells and for Chlamydiazyme detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. Kellogg JA, Seiple JW, Klinedinst JL, Levisky JS. J Clin Microbiol; 1992 Nov; 30(11):2988-90. PubMed ID: 1452671 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Confirmatory testing demonstrates that false-positive rates in the chlamydiazyme assay are influenced by gender and genital specimen type. Chernesky M, Jang D, Sellors J, Castriciano S, Pickard L, Luinstra K, Mahony J. Sex Transm Dis; 1993 Nov; 20(6):301-6. PubMed ID: 8108751 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Impact of endocervical specimen quality on apparent prevalence of Chlamydia trachomatis infections diagnosed using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay method. Kellogg JA, Seiple JW, Klinedinst JL, Levisky JS. Arch Pathol Lab Med; 1991 Dec; 115(12):1223-7. PubMed ID: 1722665 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Cytobrush in collection of cervical specimens for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. Moncada J, Schachter J, Shipp M, Bolan G, Wilber J. J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Aug; 27(8):1863-6. PubMed ID: 2671035 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Diagnosis of Chlamydia trachomatis genital infections by cell culture and two enzyme immunoassays detecting different chlamydial antigens. Mahony J, Castriciano S, Sellors J, Stewart I, Cunningham I, Landis S, Seidelman W, Grant L, Devlin C, Chernesky M. J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Sep; 27(9):1934-8. PubMed ID: 2674191 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of urine, first and second endourethral swabs for PCR based detection of genital Chlamydia trachomatis infection in male patients. Sugunendran H, Birley HD, Mallinson H, Abbott M, Tong CY. Sex Transm Infect; 2001 Dec; 77(6):423-6. PubMed ID: 11714940 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of chlamydiazyme enzyme immunoassay for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urine specimens from men. Ehret JM, Leszcynski JC, Douglas JM, Genova SL, Chernesky MA, Moncada J, Schachter J. J Clin Microbiol; 1993 Oct; 31(10):2702-5. PubMed ID: 8253969 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. TestPack Chlamydia, a new rapid assay for the direct detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. Coleman P, Varitek V, Mushahwar IK, Marchlewicz B, Safford J, Hansen J, Kurpiewski G, Grier T. J Clin Microbiol; 1989 Dec; 27(12):2811-4. PubMed ID: 2592542 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis by nucleic acid amplification testing: our evaluation suggests that CDC-recommended approaches for confirmatory testing are ill-advised. Schachter J, Chow JM, Howard H, Bolan G, Moncada J. J Clin Microbiol; 2006 Jul; 44(7):2512-7. PubMed ID: 16825373 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Diagnosis by AMPLICOR PCR of Chlamydia trachomatis infection in urine samples from women and men attending sexually transmitted disease clinics. Quinn TC, Welsh L, Lentz A, Crotchfelt K, Zenilman J, Newhall J, Gaydos C. J Clin Microbiol; 1996 Jun; 34(6):1401-6. PubMed ID: 8735088 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Should we consider alternatives to combined cervical and urethral swabs for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in females? Mahto M, Mallinson H. Sex Transm Infect; 2007 Jul; 83(4):335-6. PubMed ID: 17611234 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in genitourinary tract specimens using an automated enzyme-linked fluorescent immunoassay. Gun-Munro J, Mahony J, Lyn P, Luinstra K, Smaill F, Richardson H. Sex Transm Dis; 1996 Jul; 23(2):115-9. PubMed ID: 8919737 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Detection of Chlamydia trachomatis antigens by enzyme immunoassay and immunofluorescence in genital specimens from symptomatic and asymptomatic men and women. Chernesky MA, Mahony JB, Castriciano S, Mores M, Stewart IO, Landis SJ, Seidelman W, Sargeant EJ, Leman C. J Infect Dis; 1986 Jul; 154(1):141-8. PubMed ID: 3519787 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. [Usefulness of real-time PCR in detecting Chlamydia trachomatis and Neisseria gonorrhoeae in endocervical swabs and first-voided urine specimens]. Hamasuna R, Kawai S, Ando Y, Ito K, Kurashima M, Nishimura H, Yamaguchi T, Yoshimura M, Kobayashi T, Muratani T, Matsumoto T. Kansenshogaku Zasshi; 2013 Sep; 87(5 Suppl 8):17-23. PubMed ID: 24475696 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Multicenter evaluation of the fully automated COBAS AMPLICOR PCR test for detection of Chlamydia trachomatis in urogenital specimens. Vincelette J, Schirm J, Bogard M, Bourgault AM, Luijt DS, Bianchi A, van Voorst Vader PC, Butcher A, Rosenstraus M. J Clin Microbiol; 1999 Jan; 37(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 9854067 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]