These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
3. Objective evaluation of compliance after orthodontic treatment using Hawley or vacuum-formed retainers: A 2-center randomized controlled trial over a 3-month period. Vagdouti G, Karvouni E, Bitsanis E, Koletsi D. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Dec; 156(6):717-726.e2. PubMed ID: 31784005 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. [Clinical evaluation of lingual fixed retainer combined with Hawley retainer and vacuum-formed retainer]. Xu XC, Li RM, Tang GH. Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2011 Dec; 20(6):623-6. PubMed ID: 22241313 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparative evaluation of salivary bisphenol A levels in patients wearing vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers: An in-vivo study. Raghavan AS, Pottipalli Sathyanarayana H, Kailasam V, Padmanabhan S. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2017 Mar; 151(3):471-476. PubMed ID: 28257731 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing the effects of Essix and Hawley retainers on the acoustics of speech. Atik E, Esen Aydinli F, Kulak Kayikçi ME, Ciger S. Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug 01; 39(4):440-445. PubMed ID: 27507127 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Acceptability comparison between Hawley retainers and vacuum-formed retainers in orthodontic adult patients: a single-centre, randomized controlled trial. Saleh M, Hajeer MY, Muessig D. Eur J Orthod; 2017 Aug 01; 39(4):453-461. PubMed ID: 28430890 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. The origin and evolution of the Hawley retainer for the effectiveness to maintain tooth position after fixed orthodontic treatment compare to vacuum-formed retainer: A systematic review of RCTs. Outhaisavanh S, Liu Y, Song J. Int Orthod; 2020 Jun 01; 18(2):225-236. PubMed ID: 32201168 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparative evaluation of salivary microbial levels and periodontal status of patients wearing fixed and removable orthodontic retainers. Eroglu AK, Baka ZM, Arslan U. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug 01; 156(2):186-192. PubMed ID: 31375228 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A two-year comparative assessment of retention of arch width increases between modified vacuum-formed and Hawley retainers: a multi-center randomized clinical trial. Ashari A, Nik Mustapha NM, Yuen JJX, Saw ZK, Lau MN, Xian L, Syed Mohamed AMF, Megat Abdul Wahab R, Yeoh CK, Deva Tata M, Sinnasamy S. Prog Orthod; 2022 Aug 26; 23(1):40. PubMed ID: 36018418 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. The retention characteristics of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers with different retention protocols. Ramazanzadeh B, Ahrari F, Hosseini ZS. J Clin Exp Dent; 2018 Mar 26; 10(3):e224-e231. PubMed ID: 29721222 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A retrospective randomized double-blind comparison study of the effectiveness of Hawley vs vacuum-formed retainers. Barlin S, Smith R, Reed R, Sandy J, Ireland AJ. Angle Orthod; 2011 May 26; 81(3):404-9. PubMed ID: 21261482 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of three orthodontic retainers on periodontal pathogens and periodontal parameters. Li B, Lu C, Yao X, Wu X, Wu G, Zeng X. Sci Rep; 2023 Nov 24; 13(1):20709. PubMed ID: 38001102 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Posterior occlusion changes with a Hawley vs Perfector and Hawley retainer. A follow-up study. Bauer EM, Behrents R, Oliver DR, Buschang PH. Angle Orthod; 2010 Sep 24; 80(5):853-60. PubMed ID: 20578855 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]