These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
197 related items for PubMed ID: 27557042
21. Comparison of the effects of Hawley and perfector/spring aligner retainers on postorthodontic occlusion. Horton JK, Buschang PH, Oliver DR, Behrents RG. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jun; 135(6):729-36. PubMed ID: 19524832 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. [Factors affecting stability after fixed orthodontic treatment]. Ren SS, Dai X, Ying M, Wang WX, Chang J, Hou ZM. Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2018 Sep 09; 53(9):599-603. PubMed ID: 30196619 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. Vacuum-formed retainers and bonded retainers for dental stabilization-a randomized controlled trial. Part II: patients' perceptions 6 and 18 months after orthodontic treatment. Krämer A, Sjöström M, Hallman M, Feldmann I. Eur J Orthod; 2021 Apr 03; 43(2):136-143. PubMed ID: 32613244 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Bonded versus vacuum-formed retainers: a randomized controlled trial. Part 1: stability, retainer survival, and patient satisfaction outcomes after 12 months. Forde K, Storey M, Littlewood SJ, Scott P, Luther F, Kang J. Eur J Orthod; 2018 Jul 27; 40(4):387-398. PubMed ID: 29059289 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Acrylic orthodontic retainer is not a risk factor for focal Candida colonization in young healthy patients: a pilot study. Yitschaky O, Katorza A, Zini A, Yitschaky M, Zadik Y. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol; 2016 Jan 27; 121(1):39-42. PubMed ID: 26679358 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. The effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers: a single-center randomized controlled trial. Rowland H, Hichens L, Williams A, Hills D, Killingback N, Ewings P, Clark S, Ireland AJ, Sandy JR. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Dec 27; 132(6):730-7. PubMed ID: 18068589 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. A survey of patient compliance with removable orthodontic retainer wear in Brunei Darussalam. Lim ME, Dhaliwal JS, Wahab SWHA, Rahman HA. BDJ Open; 2023 Mar 03; 9(1):10. PubMed ID: 36869042 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Streptococcus mutans counts in patients wearing removable retainers with silver nanoparticles vs those wearing conventional retainers: A randomized clinical trial. Farhadian N, Usefi Mashoof R, Khanizadeh S, Ghaderi E, Farhadian M, Miresmaeili A. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Feb 03; 149(2):155-60. PubMed ID: 26827971 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Factors influencing adherence to vacuum-formed retainer wear: A qualitative study. Al-Moghrabi D, Colonio Salazar FB, Johal A, Fleming PS. J Orthod; 2019 Sep 03; 46(3):212-219. PubMed ID: 31151360 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Patient compliance to wear orthodontic retainers during postretention may vary by age, gender, and time since braces were removed. Vig KW. J Evid Based Dent Pract; 2012 Sep 03; 12(3 Suppl):202-3. PubMed ID: 23253846 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. Patient compliance with Hawley retainers fitted with the SMART(®) sensor: a prospective clinical pilot study. Hyun P, Preston CB, Al-Jewair TS, Park-Hyun E, Tabbaa S. Angle Orthod; 2015 Mar 03; 85(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 24869901 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Occlusal contact area changes with different retention protocols: 1-year follow-up. Kara B, Yilmaz B. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2020 Apr 03; 157(4):533-541. PubMed ID: 32241360 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]