These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

533 related items for PubMed ID: 27560038

  • 1. Benefits of active middle ear implants in mixed hearing loss: Stapes versus round window.
    Lee JM, Jung J, Moon IS, Kim SH, Choi JY.
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Jun; 127(6):1435-1441. PubMed ID: 27560038
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Vibroplasty in mixed and conductive hearing loss: comparison of different coupling methods.
    Vyskocil E, Riss D, Honeder C, Arnoldner C, Hamzavi JS, Baumgartner WD, Flak S, Gstoettner W.
    Laryngoscope; 2014 Jun; 124(6):1436-43. PubMed ID: 24338550
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Retrospective audiological analysis of bone conduction versus round window vibratory stimulation in patients with mixed hearing loss.
    Mojallal H, Schwab B, Hinze AL, Giere T, Lenarz T.
    Int J Audiol; 2015 Jun; 54(6):391-400. PubMed ID: 25735204
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Comparison of Alternative Coupling Methods of the Vibrant Soundbridge Floating Mass Transducer.
    Busch S, Lenarz T, Maier H.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2016 Jun; 21(6):347-355. PubMed ID: 28068651
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. [The active middle ear implant for the rehabilitation of sensorineural, mixed and conductive hearing losses].
    Sprinzl GM, Wolf-Magele A, Schnabl J, Koci V.
    Laryngorhinootologie; 2011 Sep; 90(9):560-72. PubMed ID: 21913153
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Reinforced active middle ear implant fixation in incus vibroplasty.
    Mlynski R, Dalhoff E, Heyd A, Wildenstein D, Hagen R, Gummer AW, Schraven SP.
    Ear Hear; 2015 Jan; 36(1):72-81. PubMed ID: 25099400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Oval window membrane vibroplasty for direct acoustic cochlear stimulation: treating severe mixed hearing loss in challenging middle ears.
    Schwab B, Salcher RB, Maier H, Kontorinis G.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):804-9. PubMed ID: 22699990
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A retrospective European multicenter analysis of the functional outcomes after active middle ear implant surgery using the third generation vibroplasty couplers.
    Rahne T, Skarzynski PH, Hagen R, Radeloff A, Lassaletta L, Barbara M, Plontke SK, Mlynski R.
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2021 Jan; 278(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 32451668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clip vibroplasty: experimental evaluation and first clinical results.
    Hüttenbrink KB, Beutner D, Bornitz M, Luers JC, Zahnert T.
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Jun; 32(4):650-3. PubMed ID: 21765388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Application of active middle ear implants in patients with severe mixed hearing loss.
    Verhaegen VJ, Mulder JJ, Cremers CW, Snik AF.
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Apr; 33(3):297-301. PubMed ID: 22366752
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Active middle ear implant coupled bilaterally to the round window despite bilateral implanted stapes prostheses.
    Coordes A, Jahreiss L, Schönfeld U, Lenarz M.
    Laryngoscope; 2017 Feb; 127(2):500-503. PubMed ID: 27346704
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Does Coupling and Positioning in Vibroplasty Matter? A Prospective Cohort Study.
    Marino R, Lampacher P, Dittrich G, Tavora-Vieira D, Kuthubutheen J, Rajan GP.
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Aug; 36(7):1223-30. PubMed ID: 26075675
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Long-term outcome of round window Vibrant SoundBridge implantation in extensive ossicular chain defects.
    Colletti L, Mandalà M, Colletti V.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2013 Jul; 149(1):134-41. PubMed ID: 23585147
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Electrocochleography in round window Vibrant Soundbridge implantation.
    Colletti V, Mandalà M, Colletti L.
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2012 Apr; 146(4):633-40. PubMed ID: 22140205
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of Carina active middle-ear implant with conventional hearing aids for mixed hearing loss.
    Savaş VA, Gündüz B, Karamert R, Cevizci R, Düzlü M, Tutar H, Bayazit YA.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2016 Apr; 130(4):340-3. PubMed ID: 26991874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Long-Term Outcomes of Vibroplasty Coupler Implantations to Treat Mixed/Conductive Hearing Loss.
    Zahnert T, Mlynski R, Löwenheim H, Beutner D, Hagen R, Ernst A, Zehlicke T, Kühne H, Friese N, Tropitzsch A, Luers JC, Todt I, Hüttenbrink KB.
    Audiol Neurootol; 2018 Apr; 23(6):316-325. PubMed ID: 30650421
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Vibrant Soundbridge for hearing restoration after chronic ear surgery.
    Streitberger C, Perotti M, Beltrame MA, Giarbini N.
    Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord); 2009 Apr; 130(2):83-8. PubMed ID: 19813469
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Impact of floating mass transducer coupling and positioning in round window vibroplasty.
    Rajan GP, Lampacher P, Ambett R, Dittrich G, Kuthubutheen J, Wood B, McArthur A, Marino R.
    Otol Neurotol; 2011 Feb; 32(2):271-7. PubMed ID: 21206391
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Active middle ear implants in patients undergoing subtotal petrosectomy: long-term follow-up.
    Henseler MA, Polanski JF, Schlegel C, Linder T.
    Otol Neurotol; 2014 Mar; 35(3):437-41. PubMed ID: 24492140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 27.