These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

206 related items for PubMed ID: 27599176

  • 1. Differences in Corneal Biomechanics in Nonpenetrating Deep Sclerectomy and Deep Sclerectomy Reconverted into Trabeculectomy.
    Casado A, Cabarga C, Pérez-Sarriegui A, Fuentemilla E.
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Jan; 26(1):15-19. PubMed ID: 27599176
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Modifications in corneal biomechanics and intraocular pressure after deep sclerectomy.
    Iordanidou V, Hamard P, Gendron G, Labbé A, Raphael M, Baudouin C.
    J Glaucoma; 2010 Jan; 19(4):252-6. PubMed ID: 19661821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties, central corneal thickness, and intraocular pressure across the spectrum of glaucoma.
    Kaushik S, Pandav SS, Banger A, Aggarwal K, Gupta A.
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2012 May; 153(5):840-849.e2. PubMed ID: 22310080
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Factors influencing intermethod agreement between goldmann applanation, pascal dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometry.
    Sullivan-Mee M, Lewis SE, Pensyl D, Gerhardt G, Halverson KD, Qualls C.
    J Glaucoma; 2013 Aug; 22(6):487-95. PubMed ID: 22407388
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Can Corneal Biomechanical Properties Explain Difference in Tonometric Measurement in Normal Eyes?
    Dey A, David RL, Asokan R, George R.
    Optom Vis Sci; 2018 Feb; 95(2):120-128. PubMed ID: 29370019
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Corneal biomechanics measured with the ocular response analyser in patients with unilateral open-angle glaucoma.
    Hirneiss C, Neubauer AS, Yu A, Kampik A, Kernt M.
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2011 Mar; 89(2):e189-92. PubMed ID: 21288308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Relationship between corneal biomechanical properties and optic nerve head changes after deep sclerectomy.
    Díez-Álvarez L, Muñoz-Negrete FJ, Casas-Llera P, Oblanca N, de Juan V, Rebolleda G.
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2017 Aug 30; 27(5):535-541. PubMed ID: 28430332
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Comparison of Biomechanically Corrected Intraocular Pressure Obtained by Corvis ST and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Patients With Open-angle Glaucoma and Ocular Hypertension.
    Ye Y, Yang Y, Fan Y, Lan M, Yu K, Yu M.
    J Glaucoma; 2019 Oct 30; 28(10):922-928. PubMed ID: 31453898
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Intraocular pressure measurement precision with the Goldmann applanation, dynamic contour, and ocular response analyzer tonometers.
    Kotecha A, White E, Schlottmann PG, Garway-Heath DF.
    Ophthalmology; 2010 Apr 30; 117(4):730-7. PubMed ID: 20122737
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 11.