These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

255 related items for PubMed ID: 27605592

  • 1. A Comprehensive Performance Evaluation of Five Blood Glucose Systems in the Hypo-, Eu-, and Hyperglycemic Range.
    Zijlstra E, Heinemann L, Fischer A, Kapitza C.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2016 Nov; 10(6):1316-1323. PubMed ID: 27605592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Clinical assessment of the accuracy of blood glucose measurement devices.
    Pfützner A, Mitri M, Musholt PB, Sachsenheimer D, Borchert M, Yap A, Forst T.
    Curr Med Res Opin; 2012 Apr; 28(4):525-31. PubMed ID: 22435798
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Accuracy evaluation of five blood glucose monitoring systems obtained from the pharmacy: a European multicenter study with 453 subjects.
    Tack C, Pohlmeier H, Behnke T, Schmid V, Grenningloh M, Forst T, Pfützner A.
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2012 Apr; 14(4):330-7. PubMed ID: 22176154
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Accuracy evaluation of contour next compared with five blood glucose monitoring systems across a wide range of blood glucose concentrations occurring in a clinical research setting.
    Klaff LJ, Brazg R, Hughes K, Tideman AM, Schachner HC, Stenger P, Pardo S, Dunne N, Parkes JL.
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2015 Jan; 17(1):8-15. PubMed ID: 25260047
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of Accuracy of Six Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems and Modeling of Possibly Related Insulin Dosing Errors.
    Baumstark A, Jendrike N, Pleus S, Haug C, Freckmann G.
    Diabetes Technol Ther; 2017 Oct; 19(10):580-588. PubMed ID: 28704063
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Lot-to-lot variability of test strips and accuracy assessment of systems for self-monitoring of blood glucose according to ISO 15197.
    Baumstark A, Pleus S, Schmid C, Link M, Haug C, Freckmann G.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2012 Sep 01; 6(5):1076-86. PubMed ID: 23063033
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. How to Assess the Quality of Glucose Clamps? Evaluation of Clamps Performed With ClampArt, a Novel Automated Clamp Device.
    Benesch C, Heise T, Klein O, Heinemann L, Arnolds S.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2015 Jul 01; 9(4):792-800. PubMed ID: 25852075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Blood glucose meters employing dynamic electrochemistry are stable against hematocrit interference in a laboratory setting.
    Pfützner A, Musholt PB, Schipper C, Demircik F, Hengesbach C, Flacke F, Sieber J, Forst T.
    J Diabetes Sci Technol; 2013 Nov 01; 7(6):1530-7. PubMed ID: 24351179
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.