These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

669 related items for PubMed ID: 27627597

  • 1. Impact of replacing Chinese ethnicity-specific fetal biometry charts with the INTERGROWTH-21(st) standard.
    Cheng Y, Leung TY, Lao T, Chan YM, Sahota DS.
    BJOG; 2016 Sep; 123 Suppl 3():48-55. PubMed ID: 27627597
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Single and Serial Fetal Biometry to Detect Preterm and Term Small- and Large-for-Gestational-Age Neonates: A Longitudinal Cohort Study.
    Tarca AL, Hernandez-Andrade E, Ahn H, Garcia M, Xu Z, Korzeniewski SJ, Saker H, Chaiworapongsa T, Hassan SS, Yeo L, Romero R.
    PLoS One; 2016 Sep; 11(11):e0164161. PubMed ID: 27802270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Implementing the INTERGROWTH-21st fetal growth standards in France: a 'flash study' of the College Français d'Echographie Foetale (CFEF).
    Stirnemann JJ, Fries N, Bessis R, Fontanges M, Mangione R, Salomon LJ.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 49(4):487-492. PubMed ID: 27516404
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 35-37 weeks.
    Fadigas C, Saiid Y, Gonzalez R, Poon LC, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 45(5):559-65. PubMed ID: 25728139
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Which fetal growth charts should be used? A retrospective observational study in China.
    Zhao J, Yuan Y, Tao J, Chen C, Wu X, Liao Y, Wu L, Zeng Q, Chen Y, Wang K, Li X, Liu Z, Zhou J, Zhou Y, Li S, Zhu J.
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2022 Aug 20; 135(16):1969-1977. PubMed ID: 36070466
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project.
    Stirnemann J, Villar J, Salomon LJ, Ohuma E, Ruyan P, Altman DG, Nosten F, Craik R, Munim S, Cheikh Ismail L, Barros FC, Lambert A, Norris S, Carvalho M, Jaffer YA, Noble JA, Bertino E, Gravett MG, Purwar M, Victora CG, Uauy R, Bhutta Z, Kennedy S, Papageorghiou AT, International Fetal and Newborn Growth Consortium for the 21st Century (INTERGROWTH-21st).
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr 20; 49(4):478-486. PubMed ID: 27804212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Intrauterine growth patterns in rural Ethiopia compared with WHO and INTERGROWTH-21st growth standards: A community-based longitudinal study.
    Roro M, Deressa W, Lindtjørn B.
    PLoS One; 2019 Apr 20; 14(12):e0226881. PubMed ID: 31891599
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonate by third-trimester fetal biometry and impact of ultrasound-delivery interval.
    Reboul Q, Delabaere A, Luo ZC, Nuyt AM, Wu Y, Chauleur C, Fraser W, Audibert F.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Mar 20; 49(3):372-378. PubMed ID: 27153518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Fetal biometry assessment with Intergrowth 21st's and Salomon's equations in rural Burkina Faso.
    Bihoun B, Zango SH, Traoré-Coulibaly M, Valea I, Ravinetto R, Van Geertruyden JP, D'Alessandro U, Tinto H, Robert A.
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Aug 26; 20(1):492. PubMed ID: 32847549
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Fetal growth standards: the NICHD fetal growth study approach in context with INTERGROWTH-21st and the World Health Organization Multicentre Growth Reference Study.
    Grantz KL, Hediger ML, Liu D, Buck Louis GM.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb 26; 218(2S):S641-S655.e28. PubMed ID: 29275821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Comparing population-based fetal growth standards in a US cohort.
    Gleason JL, Reddy UM, Chen Z, Grobman WA, Wapner RJ, Steller JG, Simhan H, Scifres CM, Blue N, Parry S, Grantz KL.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2024 Sep 26; 231(3):338.e1-338.e18. PubMed ID: 38151220
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 30-34 weeks.
    Bakalis S, Silva M, Akolekar R, Poon LC, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May 26; 45(5):551-8. PubMed ID: 25523866
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Prediction of adverse perinatal outcome by fetal biometry: comparison of customized and population-based standards.
    Kabiri D, Romero R, Gudicha DW, Hernandez-Andrade E, Pacora P, Benshalom-Tirosh N, Tirosh D, Yeo L, Erez O, Hassan SS, Tarca AL.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb 26; 55(2):177-188. PubMed ID: 31006913
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Validation of Reference Charts for Mid-Trimester Fetal Biometry.
    van de Kamp K, Pajkrt E, Zwinderman AH, van der Post JA, Snijders RJM.
    Fetal Diagn Ther; 2019 Feb 26; 45(1):42-49. PubMed ID: 29533928
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Third-Trimester Fetal Biometry and Neonatal Outcomes in Term and Preterm Deliveries.
    Sheth T, Glantz JC.
    J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Jan 26; 35(1):103-10. PubMed ID: 26643756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Prospective assessment of INTERGROWTH-21st and World Health Organization estimated fetal weight reference curves.
    Cheng YKY, Lu J, Leung TY, Chan YM, Sahota DS.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jun 26; 51(6):792-798. PubMed ID: 28452092
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Customized vs INTERGROWTH-21st standards for the assessment of birthweight and stillbirth risk at term.
    Francis A, Hugh O, Gardosi J.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Feb 26; 218(2S):S692-S699. PubMed ID: 29422208
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Routine ultrasound at 32 vs 36 weeks' gestation: prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates.
    Ciobanu A, Khan N, Syngelaki A, Akolekar R, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Jun 26; 53(6):761-768. PubMed ID: 30883981
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 19-24 weeks.
    Lesmes C, Gallo DM, Panaiotova J, Poon LC, Nicolaides KH.
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2015 Aug 26; 46(2):198-207. PubMed ID: 25704207
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of estimated fetal weight percentiles near term for predicting extremes of birthweight percentile.
    Sovio U, Smith GCS.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2021 Mar 26; 224(3):292.e1-292.e19. PubMed ID: 32835717
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 34.