These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

699 related items for PubMed ID: 27627721

  • 1. Can an Endplate-conformed Cervical Cage Provide a Better Biomechanical Environment than a Typical Non-conformed Cage?: A Finite Element Model and Cadaver Study.
    Zhang F, Xu HC, Yin B, Xia XL, Ma XS, Wang HL, Yin J, Shao MH, Lyu FZ, Jiang JY.
    Orthop Surg; 2016 Aug; 8(3):367-76. PubMed ID: 27627721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Biomechanical comparison of multilevel lateral interbody fusion with and without supplementary instrumentation: a three-dimensional finite element study.
    Liu X, Ma J, Park P, Huang X, Xie N, Ye X.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2017 Feb 02; 18(1):63. PubMed ID: 28153036
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Adjacent segment biomechanical changes after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion using either a zero-profile device or cage plus plate: A finite element analysis.
    Hua W, Zhi J, Ke W, Wang B, Yang S, Li L, Yang C.
    Comput Biol Med; 2020 May 02; 120():103760. PubMed ID: 32421657
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Biomechanical Comparison of Integrated Fixation Cage Versus Anterior Cervical Plate and Cage in Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion (ACCF): A Finite Element Analysis.
    Ouyang P, Lu T, He X, Gao Z, Cai X, Jin Z.
    Med Sci Monit; 2019 Feb 25; 25():1489-1498. PubMed ID: 30799836
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Finite element biomechanical analysis of 3D printed intervertebral fusion cage in osteoporotic population.
    Wu J, Miao J, Chen G, Xu H, Wen W, Xu H, Liu L.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 Feb 12; 25(1):129. PubMed ID: 38347518
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Biomechanical evaluation of stand-alone interbody fusion cages in the cervical spine.
    Shimamoto N, Cunningham BW, Dmitriev AE, Minami A, McAfee PC.
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Oct 01; 26(19):E432-6. PubMed ID: 11698902
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Novel S-Type, Dynamic Zero-Profile Cage Design for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Variations in Bone Graft Shape: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Manickam PS, Roy S, Shetty GM.
    World Neurosurg; 2021 Oct 01; 154():e199-e214. PubMed ID: 34246827
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
    Cunningham BW, Hu N, Zorn CM, McAfee PC.
    Spine J; 2010 Apr 01; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Biomechanics of adjacent segments after a multilevel cervical corpectomy using anterior, posterior, and combined anterior-posterior instrumentation techniques: a finite element model study.
    Hussain M, Nassr A, Natarajan RN, An HS, Andersson GB.
    Spine J; 2013 Jun 01; 13(6):689-96. PubMed ID: 23578989
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Biomechanical effect of endplate defects on the intermediate vertebral bone in consecutive two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion: a finite element analysis.
    Zhang J, Chen W, Weng R, Liang D, Jiang X, Lin H.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2023 May 22; 24(1):407. PubMed ID: 37217909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Biomechanical evaluation of adjacent segment degeneration after one- or two-level anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus cervical disc arthroplasty: A finite element analysis.
    Hua W, Zhi J, Wang B, Ke W, Sun W, Yang S, Li L, Yang C.
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2020 Jun 22; 189():105352. PubMed ID: 31991316
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Biomechanical comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: stand-alone interbody cage versus interbody cage with pedicle screw fixation -- a finite element analysis.
    Choi KC, Ryu KS, Lee SH, Kim YH, Lee SJ, Park CK.
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2013 Jul 26; 14():220. PubMed ID: 23890389
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Biomechanical Comparison of a New Memory Compression Alloy Plate versus Traditional Titanium Plate for Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion: A Finite Element Analysis.
    Liu J, Wang R, Wang H, Wang Y, Lv D, Diao P, Feng S, Gao Y.
    Biomed Res Int; 2020 Jul 26; 2020():5769293. PubMed ID: 32724803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Application of a stand-alone interbody fusion cage based on a novel porous TiO2/glass ceramic--2: Biomechanical evaluation after implantation in the sheep cervical spine].
    Korinth MC, Hero T, Pandorf T, Zell D.
    Biomed Tech (Berl); 2005 Apr 26; 50(4):111-8. PubMed ID: 15884708
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Biomechanical Effect of C5 /C6 Intervertebral Reconstructive Height on Adjacent Segments in Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion - A Finite Element Analysis.
    Zhou JM, Guo X, Kang L, Zhao R, Yang XT, Fu YB, Xue Y.
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Jun 26; 13(4):1408-1416. PubMed ID: 33942538
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 35.