These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

399 related items for PubMed ID: 27632411

  • 1. Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques.
    Schrufer-Poland TL, Ruiz MP, Kassar S, Tomassian C, Algren SD, Yeast JD.
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():53-56. PubMed ID: 27632411
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
    Zaki MN, Wing DA, McNulty JA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
    Madsen AM, Dow ML, Lohse CM, Tessmer-Tuck JA.
    BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Wound complications in obese women after cesarean: a comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture.
    Zaki MN, Truong M, Pyra M, Kominiarek MA, Irwin T.
    J Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 36(10):819-22. PubMed ID: 27253895
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.
    Tuuli MG, Stout MJ, Martin S, Rampersad RM, Cahill AG, Macones GA.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis.
    Wang H, Hong S, Teng H, Qiao L, Yin H.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3705-11. PubMed ID: 26785886
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Wound morbidity with staples compared with suture for cesarean skin closure by diabetic status.
    Fitzwater JL, Jauk VC, Figueroa D, Biggio JR, Andrews WW, Tita AT.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(2):279-82. PubMed ID: 25567558
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Suture Compared With Staples for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Mackeen AD, Sullivan MV, Schuster M, Berghella V.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2022 Aug 01; 140(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 35852281
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial.
    Poprzeczny AJ, Grivell RM, Louise J, Deussen AR, Dodd JM.
    BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct 08; 20(1):606. PubMed ID: 33032560
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis.
    Mackeen AD, Schuster M, Berghella V.
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May 08; 212(5):621.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25530592
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Suture Compared With Staple Closure of Skin Incision for High-Order Cesarean Deliveries.
    Fox NS, Melka S, Miller J, Bender S, Silverstein M, Saltzman DH, Rebarber A.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Mar 08; 131(3):523-528. PubMed ID: 29420412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Skin closure with subcuticular absorbable staples after cesarean section is associated with decreased analgesic use.
    Nitsche J, Howell C, Howell T.
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2012 Apr 08; 285(4):979-83. PubMed ID: 22037686
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
    Figueroa D, Jauk VC, Szychowski JM, Garner R, Biggio JR, Andrews WW, Hauth J, Tita AT.
    Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan 08; 121(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23262925
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
    Mackeen AD, Berghella V, Larsen ML.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov 14; 11(11):CD003577. PubMed ID: 23152219
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Does Time of Wound Complication after Cesarean Delivery Differ by Type of Skin Closure?
    Cooper SM, Blanchard CT, Szychowski JM, Tita ATN.
    Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jul 14; 36(9):981-984. PubMed ID: 30477032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Effect of skin coverage method following subcuticular suturing on wound infection rates at cesarean delivery.
    Westcott JM, Crockett L, Qiu F, Berg TG.
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2017 Aug 14; 30(16):2003-2005. PubMed ID: 27624413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
    Mackeen AD, Berghella V, Larsen ML.
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep 12; (9):CD003577. PubMed ID: 22972064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 20.