These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
486 related items for PubMed ID: 27664296
1. No significant effect of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) found on simple motor reaction time comparing 15 different simulation protocols. Horvath JC, Carter O, Forte JD. Neuropsychologia; 2016 Oct; 91():544-552. PubMed ID: 27664296 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Transcranial direct current stimulation: electrode montage in stroke. Mahmoudi H, Borhani Haghighi A, Petramfar P, Jahanshahi S, Salehi Z, Fregni F. Disabil Rehabil; 2011 Oct; 33(15-16):1383-8. PubMed ID: 21110732 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Effects of a common transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) protocol on motor evoked potentials found to be highly variable within individuals over 9 testing sessions. Horvath JC, Vogrin SJ, Carter O, Cook MJ, Forte JD. Exp Brain Res; 2016 Sep; 234(9):2629-42. PubMed ID: 27150317 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Excitability modulation of the motor system induced by transcranial direct current stimulation: a multimodal approach. Pellicciari MC, Brignani D, Miniussi C. Neuroimage; 2013 Dec; 83():569-80. PubMed ID: 23845429 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Enhanced motor learning with bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation: Impact of polarity or current flow direction? Naros G, Geyer M, Koch S, Mayr L, Ellinger T, Grimm F, Gharabaghi A. Clin Neurophysiol; 2016 Apr; 127(4):2119-26. PubMed ID: 26818881 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability. Tremblay S, Larochelle-Brunet F, Lafleur LP, El Mouderrib S, Lepage JF, Théoret H. Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 44(5):2184-90. PubMed ID: 27336413 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Induction of cortical plasticity and improved motor performance following unilateral and bilateral transcranial direct current stimulation of the primary motor cortex. Kidgell DJ, Goodwill AM, Frazer AK, Daly RM. BMC Neurosci; 2013 Jul 01; 14():64. PubMed ID: 23815634 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Polarity specific effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on interhemispheric inhibition. Tazoe T, Endoh T, Kitamura T, Ogata T. PLoS One; 2014 Jul 01; 9(12):e114244. PubMed ID: 25478912 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of simultaneous bilateral tDCS of the human motor cortex. Mordillo-Mateos L, Turpin-Fenoll L, Millán-Pascual J, Núñez-Pérez N, Panyavin I, Gómez-Argüelles JM, Botia-Paniagua E, Foffani G, Lang N, Oliviero A. Brain Stimul; 2012 Jul 01; 5(3):214-222. PubMed ID: 21782545 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Transcranial Direct-Current Stimulation Can Enhance Motor Learning in Children. Ciechanski P, Kirton A. Cereb Cortex; 2017 May 01; 27(5):2758-2767. PubMed ID: 27166171 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Stimulation intensities of transcranial direct current stimulation have to be adjusted in children and adolescents. Moliadze V, Schmanke T, Andreas S, Lyzhko E, Freitag CM, Siniatchkin M. Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Jul 01; 126(7):1392-9. PubMed ID: 25468234 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Anodal transcranial direct current stimulation modulates GABAB-related intracortical inhibition in the M1 of healthy individuals. Tremblay S, Beaulé V, Lepage JF, Théoret H. Neuroreport; 2013 Jan 09; 24(1):46-50. PubMed ID: 23196416 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Transcranial direct current stimulation of the premotor cortex: effects on hand dexterity. Pavlova E, Kuo MF, Nitsche MA, Borg J. Brain Res; 2014 Aug 12; 1576():52-62. PubMed ID: 24978602 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability. Lang N, Nitsche MA, Paulus W, Rothwell JC, Lemon RN. Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jun 12; 156(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 14745467 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Intra-Subject Consistency and Reliability of Response Following 2 mA Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation. Dyke K, Kim S, Jackson GM, Jackson SR. Brain Stimul; 2016 Jun 12; 9(6):819-825. PubMed ID: 27387569 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Propriospinal cutaneous-induced EMG suppression is unaltered by anodal tDCS of healthy motor cortex. McCambridge AB, Stinear JW, Peek S, Byblow WD. Clin Neurophysiol; 2017 Sep 12; 128(9):1608-1616. PubMed ID: 28715712 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting behavioural response to TDCS in chronic motor stroke. O'Shea J, Boudrias MH, Stagg CJ, Bachtiar V, Kischka U, Blicher JU, Johansen-Berg H. Neuroimage; 2014 Jan 15; 85 Pt 3(Pt 3):924-33. PubMed ID: 23727528 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Monitoring transcranial direct current stimulation induced changes in cortical excitability during the serial reaction time task. Ambrus GG, Chaieb L, Stilling R, Rothkegel H, Antal A, Paulus W. Neurosci Lett; 2016 Mar 11; 616():98-104. PubMed ID: 26826607 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Reduced Current Spread by Concentric Electrodes in Transcranial Electrical Stimulation (tES). Bortoletto M, Rodella C, Salvador R, Miranda PC, Miniussi C. Brain Stimul; 2016 Mar 11; 9(4):525-8. PubMed ID: 27061368 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Duration but not intensity influences transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) after-effects on cortical excitability. Vignaud P, Mondino M, Poulet E, Palm U, Brunelin J. Neurophysiol Clin; 2018 Apr 11; 48(2):89-92. PubMed ID: 29482881 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]