These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

365 related items for PubMed ID: 27681588

  • 41.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 42. Antibiofilm activity of chitosan/epsilon-poly-L-lysine hydrogels in a porcine ex vivo skin wound polymicrobial biofilm model.
    Pati BA, Kurata WE, Horseman TS, Pierce LM.
    Wound Repair Regen; 2021 Mar; 29(2):316-326. PubMed ID: 33480137
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 43.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 44. Testing wound dressings using an in vitro wound model.
    Lipp C, Kirker K, Agostinho A, James G, Stewart P.
    J Wound Care; 2010 Jun; 19(6):220-6. PubMed ID: 20551862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 45.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 46. Antimicrobial activity of silver-containing dressings on wound microorganisms using an in vitro biofilm model.
    Percival SL, Bowler PG, Dolman J.
    Int Wound J; 2007 Jun; 4(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 17651233
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 47.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 48.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 49.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 50.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 51. Effect of vancomycin-coated tympanostomy tubes on methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation: in vitro study.
    Jang CH, Park H, Cho YB, Choi CH.
    J Laryngol Otol; 2010 Jun; 124(6):594-8. PubMed ID: 20056010
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 52.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 53. Antimicrobial dressing efficacy against mature Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm on porcine skin explants.
    Phillips PL, Yang Q, Davis S, Sampson EM, Azeke JI, Hamad A, Schultz GS.
    Int Wound J; 2015 Aug; 12(4):469-83. PubMed ID: 24028432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 54.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 55. A novel approach to antibiofilm susceptibility testing using a thermo-reversible matrix.
    Taylor BJ, Marsh LL, Nosworthy JO, Williams DW.
    J Wound Care; 2016 Feb; 25(2):62, 64-7. PubMed ID: 26878297
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 56. Effect of Hydrofiber wound dressings on bacterial ultrastructure.
    Hobot J, Walker M, Newman G, Bowler P.
    J Electron Microsc (Tokyo); 2008 Apr; 57(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 18281349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 57.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 58.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 59. Anti-biofilm efficacy of silver nanoparticles against MRSA and MRSE isolated from wounds in a tertiary care hospital.
    Ansari MA, Khan HM, Khan AA, Cameotra SS, Alzohairy MA.
    Indian J Med Microbiol; 2015 Apr; 33(1):101-9. PubMed ID: 25560011
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 60.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.