These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

292 related items for PubMed ID: 2774298

  • 1. An evaluation of the relationship between rest position of the mandible and malocclusion.
    Sperry TP.
    Angle Orthod; 1989; 59(3):217-25. PubMed ID: 2774298
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Lip shape and position in Class II division 2 malocclusion.
    McIntyre GT, Millett DT.
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Sep; 76(5):739-44. PubMed ID: 17029504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. [Morphological studies on the bimaxillary protrusion patients. Part 3. Angle Class III malocclusion comparatively analyzed with Class I and Class II patients (author's transl)].
    Iwasawa T, Shimizu N, Yamauchi E, Yamada W, Fujiwara K.
    Nihon Kyosei Shika Gakkai Zasshi; 1980 Jun; 39(2):176-85. PubMed ID: 6935310
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Quantitative comparison of computerized discrete and animated profile preferences.
    Giddon DB, Sconzo R, Kinchen JA, Evans CA.
    Angle Orthod; 1996 Jun; 66(6):441-8. PubMed ID: 8974180
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Use of the centroid method of occlusion for studying the vertical and horizontal relationship of the mandible and maxilla.
    Murata S.
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):600-4. PubMed ID: 17873144
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Overbite and face height in 44 male subjects with class I, class II/1 and class II/2 occlusion.
    Adams CP, Kerr WJ.
    Eur J Orthod; 1981 Dec; 3(2):125-9. PubMed ID: 6941889
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. An investigation into the relationship between the cranial base angle and malocclusion.
    Dhopatkar A, Bhatia S, Rock P.
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Oct; 72(5):456-63. PubMed ID: 12401055
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Angles of facial convexity in different skeletal Classes.
    Godt A, Müller A, Kalwitzki M, Göz G.
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Dec; 29(6):648-53. PubMed ID: 17878186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Lip-tooth relationships during smiling and speech: an evaluation of different malocclusion types.
    Rashed R, Heravi F.
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 21175025
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [Evaluation on the difference in Vordere Asthöhe between the sexes and among normal occlusion, Class II division 1 malocclusion, and true-Class III malocclusion].
    Aoshima O, Arima H.
    Nichidai Koko Kagaku; 1987 Sep; 13(3):282-5. PubMed ID: 3506125
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Uvulo-glosso-pharyngeal dimensions in different anteroposterior skeletal patterns.
    Abu Allhaija ES, Al-Khateeb SN.
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1012-8. PubMed ID: 16448247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Sagittal spinal posture in relation to craniofacial morphology.
    Lippold C, Danesh G, Hoppe G, Drerup B, Hackenberg L.
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):625-31. PubMed ID: 16808569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Assessing skeletal relationships using the cervical vertebral curvature.
    Shaikh A, Khan M, Rashna HS.
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011 Jul; 22(4):27-31. PubMed ID: 22360079
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Comparison of condylar positions in centric relation and centric occlusion in pre-treatment malocclusion cases.
    Afzal A, Shameem A.
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2005 Oct; 15(10):620-3. PubMed ID: 19810300
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. [Open bite].
    de Lima RS.
    Rev Assoc Paul Cir Dent; 1980 Oct; 34(5):374-86. PubMed ID: 7005995
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Tooth size discrepancies and arch parameters among different malocclusions in a Jordanian sample.
    Al-Khateeb SN, Abu Alhaija ES.
    Angle Orthod; 2006 May; 76(3):459-65. PubMed ID: 16637727
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Facial variations related to headform type.
    Bhat M, Enlow DH.
    Angle Orthod; 1985 Oct; 55(4):269-80. PubMed ID: 3865565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Patterns of electromyographic activity in subjects with different skeletal facial types.
    Miralles R, Hevia R, Contreras L, Carvajal R, Bull R, Manns A.
    Angle Orthod; 1991 Oct; 61(4):277-84. PubMed ID: 1763838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Mandibular form and position in 10-year-old boys.
    Kerr WJ, Miller S, Ayme B, Wilhelm N.
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):115-20. PubMed ID: 8059745
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The variability of some craniofacial dimensions.
    Kerr WJ, Ford I.
    Angle Orthod; 1991 Aug; 61(3):205-10. PubMed ID: 1928822
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.