These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

129 related items for PubMed ID: 2774756

  • 1. The Hancock modified-orifice porcine bioprosthetic valve: 1976-1988.
    Cohn LH, DiSesa VJ, Collins JJ.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1989 Sep; 48(3 Suppl):S81-2. PubMed ID: 2774756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The long-term follow-up of the Hancock Modified Orifice porcine bioprosthetic valve.
    Cohn LH, Couper GS, Aranki SF, Kinchla NM, Collins JJ.
    J Card Surg; 1991 Dec; 6(4 Suppl):557-61. PubMed ID: 1810546
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Twenty-year follow-up of the Hancock modified orifice porcine aortic valve.
    Cohn LH, Collins JJ, Rizzo RJ, Adams DH, Couper GS, Aranki SF.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1998 Dec; 66(6 Suppl):S30-4. PubMed ID: 9930412
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Performance of a fabricated trileaflet porcine bioprosthesis. Midterm follow-up of the Hancock modified-orifice valve.
    DiSesa VJ, Allred EN, Kowalker W, Shemin RJ, Collins JJ, Cohn LH.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1987 Aug; 94(2):220-4. PubMed ID: 3613620
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Porcine valves: Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards aortic prostheses.
    Fann JI, Miller DC.
    Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1996 Jul; 8(3):259-68. PubMed ID: 8843517
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. The mosaic bioprosthesis in the aortic position: hemodynamic performance after 2 years.
    Eichinger WB, Schütz A, Simmerl D, Gansera BU, Breuer M, Haslinger B, Kemkes BM.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1998 Dec; 66(6 Suppl):S126-9. PubMed ID: 9930432
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. An eight-year experience with porcine bioprosthetic cardiac valves.
    Hartz RS, Fisher EB, Finkelmeier B, DeBoer A, Sanders JH, Moran JM, Michaelis LL.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1986 Jun; 91(6):910-7. PubMed ID: 3713240
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Long-term performance of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position. A review of forty-five patients with fourteen-year follow-up.
    Guerra F, Bortolotti U, Thiene G, Milano A, Mazzucco A, Talenti E, Stellin G, Gallucci V.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1990 May; 99(5):838-45. PubMed ID: 2329821
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Hemodynamic and clinical comparison of the Hancock modified orifice and standard orifice bioprostheses in the aortic position.
    Rossiter SJ, Miller DC, Stinson EB, Oyer PE, Reitz BA, Moreno-Cabral RJ, Mace JG, Robert EW, Tsagaris TJ, Sutton RB, Alderman EL, Shumway NE.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1980 Jul; 80(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 7382536
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Valve-related complications with the Hancock I porcine bioprosthesis. A twelve- to fourteen-year follow-up study.
    Bernal JM, Rabasa JM, Cagigas JC, Echevarria JR, Carrion MF, Revuelta JM.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1991 May; 101(5):871-80. PubMed ID: 2023444
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Clinical results of pericardial xenograft valves: the Ionescu-Shiley and Hancock valves.
    Goldman B, Scully H, Tong C, Mandell R, Butany J, Azuma J, Schwartz L.
    Can J Cardiol; 1988 Sep; 4(6):328-32. PubMed ID: 3179796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Survival and bioprosthetic valve failure. Ten-year follow-up.
    Teoh KH, Ivanov J, Weisel RD, Darcel IC, Rakowski H.
    Circulation; 1989 Sep; 80(3 Pt 1):I8-15. PubMed ID: 2766540
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Twenty-year clinical experience with porcine bioprostheses.
    Fann JI, Miller DC, Moore KA, Mitchell RS, Oyer PE, Stinson EB, Robbins RC, Reitz BA, Shumway NE.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1996 Nov; 62(5):1301-11; discussion 1311-2. PubMed ID: 8893561
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Hemodynamic and clinical evaluation of the Hancock modified-orifice aortic bioprosthesis.
    Zusman DR, Levine FH, Carter JE, Buckley MJ.
    Circulation; 1981 Aug; 64(2 Pt 2):II189-91. PubMed ID: 7249321
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. A prospective evaluation of the Björk-Shiley, Hancock, and Carpentier-Edwards heart valve prostheses.
    Bloomfield P, Kitchin AH, Wheatley DJ, Walbaum PR, Lutz W, Miller HC.
    Circulation; 1986 Jun; 73(6):1213-22. PubMed ID: 3516447
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Morphologic findings in explanted Hancock II porcine bioprostheses.
    Butany J, Yu W, Silver MD, David TE.
    J Heart Valve Dis; 1999 Jan; 8(1):4-15. PubMed ID: 10096476
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.