These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

129 related items for PubMed ID: 2774756

  • 21. A 20-year experience with the Hancock porcine xenograft in the elderly.
    Khan SS, Chaux A, Blanche C, Kass RM, Cheng W, Fontana GP, Trento A.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1998 Dec; 66(6 Suppl):S35-9. PubMed ID: 9930413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22. Twenty-year durability of the aortic Hancock II bioprosthesis in young patients: is it durable enough?
    Une D, Ruel M, David TE.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2014 Nov; 46(5):825-30. PubMed ID: 24510909
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23. Intrinsic failure of Hancock mitral bioprostheses: 10- to 15-year experience.
    Foster AH, Greenberg GJ, Underhill DJ, McIntosh CL, Clark RE.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1987 Dec; 44(6):568-77. PubMed ID: 3689043
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24. Early thrombosis risk in patients with biologic valves in the aortic position.
    Brown ML, Park SJ, Sundt TM, Schaff HV.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Jul; 144(1):108-11. PubMed ID: 21864857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25. Failure of Hancock xenograft valve: importance of valve position (4- to 9-year follow-up).
    Bolooki H, Mallon S, Kaiser GA, Thurer RJ, Kieval J.
    Ann Thorac Surg; 1983 Sep; 36(3):246-52. PubMed ID: 6615061
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26. More than ten years' follow-up of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in Japan.
    Kawachi Y, Tanaka J, Tominaga R, Kinoshita K, Tokunaga K.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Jul; 104(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 1614215
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Comparative clinical experience with porcine bioprosthetic and St. Jude valve replacement.
    Czer LS, Matloff JM, Chaux A, DeRobertis MA, Gray RJ.
    Chest; 1987 Apr; 91(4):503-14. PubMed ID: 3829742
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. Patient-prosthesis mismatch in patients undergoing bioprosthetic aortic valve implantation increases risk of reoperation for structural valve deterioration.
    Urso S, Calderón P, Sadaba R, Mahillo I, Tuñón J, Aldamiz G, Fraile J.
    J Card Surg; 2014 Jul; 29(4):439-44. PubMed ID: 24773571
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30. The Hancock pericardial xenograft: incidence of early mechanical failures at a medium-term follow-up.
    Bortolotti U, Milano A, Mazzucco A, Guerra F, Valente M, Thiene G, Talenti E, Gallucci V.
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1988 Jul; 2(6):458-64. PubMed ID: 3272254
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33. Excellent durability of the Hancock porcine bioprosthesis in the tricuspid position. A sixteen-year follow-up study.
    Kawachi Y, Tominaga R, Hisahara M, Nakashima A, Yasui H, Tokunaga K.
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1992 Dec; 104(6):1561-6. PubMed ID: 1453721
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39. Mid- to long-term outcome comparison of the Medtronic Hancock II and bi-leaflet mechanical aortic valve replacement in patients younger than 60 years of age: a propensity-matched analysis.
    Wang Y, Chen S, Shi J, Li G, Dong N.
    Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2016 Mar; 22(3):280-6. PubMed ID: 26675564
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 7.