These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

228 related items for PubMed ID: 2775592

  • 21.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 22.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 23.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 24.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 25.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 26.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 27. Improved control of image optical density with low-dose digital and conventional radiography in bedside imaging.
    Schaefer CM, Greene RE, Oestmann JW, Kamalsky JM, Hall DA, Llewellyn HJ, Robertson CL, Rhea JT, Rosenthal H, Rubens JR.
    Radiology; 1989 Dec; 173(3):713-6. PubMed ID: 2813775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 28. [Nodular lesions simulated on an anthropomorphic thoracic phantom. A comparison between analog and digital images of the thorax].
    Miceli M, Stamati R, Burci P, Sartoni Galloni S, Guidarelli G, Pastori R.
    Radiol Med; 1993 Dec; 85(1-2):54-8. PubMed ID: 8480049
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 29.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 30.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 31. [A ROC analysis for comparing contrast perception in grey scale reversal of digital images].
    Dölken W, Krahe T, Landwehr P, Horwitz AE, Lackner K.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1991 Jan; 1(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 2018803
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 32.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 33.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 34.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 35.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 36. Digital luminescence radiography using a chest phantom. Comparison between radiographs displayed on monitor and hard-copy.
    Kehler M, Albrechtsson U, Arnadóttir E, Ebbesen A, Hochbergs P, Lundin A, Lyttkens K, Kheddache K, Månsson LG, Angelhed JE.
    Acta Radiol; 1992 Mar; 33(2):117-22. PubMed ID: 1562402
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 37. [Digital image intensifier radiography: imaging qualities and initial use in the gastrointestinal area].
    Busch HP, Strauss LG, Prager P, Georgi M.
    Digitale Bilddiagn; 1986 Jun; 6(2):49-55. PubMed ID: 3524964
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 38. Basic imaging properties of a large image intensifier-TV digital chest radiographic system.
    Fujita H, Doi K, MacMahon H, Kume Y, Giger ML, Hoffmann KR, Katafuchi T, Ohara K, Chan HP.
    Invest Radiol; 1987 Apr; 22(4):328-35. PubMed ID: 3583653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 39.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 40. [Personal computer-based interpretation experiment system for digital chest images].
    Takabatake H, Sasaoka S, Mori M, Natori H, Suzuki H, Inaoka N, Suzuki A.
    Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1992 Feb 25; 52(2):232-4. PubMed ID: 1561064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]
    of 12.