These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

1118 related items for PubMed ID: 27764001

  • 1. Visual Temporal Acuity Is Related to Auditory Speech Perception Abilities in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Jahn KN, Stevenson RA, Wallace MT.
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):236-243. PubMed ID: 27764001
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Amplitude Modulation Detection and Speech Recognition in Late-Implanted Prelingually and Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Users.
    De Ruiter AM, Debruyne JA, Chenault MN, Francart T, Brokx JP.
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(5):557-66. PubMed ID: 25851075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM, Schuchman G, Bernstein JG.
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Effects of congruent and incongruent visual cues on speech perception and brain activity in cochlear implant users.
    Song JJ, Lee HJ, Kang H, Lee DS, Chang SO, Oh SH.
    Brain Struct Funct; 2015 Mar; 220(2):1109-25. PubMed ID: 24402676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Behavioral Measures of Temporal Processing and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Blankenship C, Zhang F, Keith R.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2016 Oct; 27(9):701-713. PubMed ID: 27718347
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Cross-Modal and Intra-Modal Characteristics of Visual Function and Speech Perception Performance in Postlingually Deafened, Cochlear Implant Users.
    Kim MB, Shim HY, Jin SH, Kang S, Woo J, Han JC, Lee JY, Kim M, Cho YS, Moon IJ, Hong SH.
    PLoS One; 2016 Oct; 11(2):e0148466. PubMed ID: 26848755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Changes in visually and auditory attended audiovisual speech processing in cochlear implant users: A longitudinal ERP study.
    Weglage A, Layer N, Meister H, Müller V, Lang-Roth R, Walger M, Sandmann P.
    Hear Res; 2024 Jun; 447():109023. PubMed ID: 38733710
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Audio-visual integration during speech perception in prelingually deafened Japanese children revealed by the McGurk effect.
    Tona R, Naito Y, Moroto S, Yamamoto R, Fujiwara K, Yamazaki H, Shinohara S, Kikuchi M.
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 Dec; 79(12):2072-8. PubMed ID: 26455920
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Word Recognition Variability With Cochlear Implants: "Perceptual Attention" Versus "Auditory Sensitivity".
    Moberly AC, Lowenstein JH, Nittrouer S.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Dec; 37(1):14-26. PubMed ID: 26301844
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Speech intelligibility as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome in prelingually deafened adults.
    van Dijkhuizen JN, Beers M, Boermans PP, Briaire JJ, Frijns JH.
    Ear Hear; 2011 Dec; 32(4):445-58. PubMed ID: 21258238
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Within- and across-frequency temporal processing and speech perception in cochlear implant users.
    Blankenship CM, Meinzen-Derr J, Zhang F.
    PLoS One; 2022 Dec; 17(10):e0275772. PubMed ID: 36227872
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Assessment of Spectral and Temporal Resolution in Cochlear Implant Users Using Psychoacoustic Discrimination and Speech Cue Categorization.
    Winn MB, Won JH, Moon IJ.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Dec; 37(6):e377-e390. PubMed ID: 27438871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Audiovisual Processing Skills Before Cochlear Implantation Predict Postoperative Speech Recognition in Adults.
    Moberly AC, Pisoni DB, Tamati TN.
    Ear Hear; 2016 Dec; 45(3):617-625. PubMed ID: 38143302
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Auditory Performance and Electrical Stimulation Measures in Cochlear Implant Recipients With Auditory Neuropathy Compared With Severe to Profound Sensorineural Hearing Loss.
    Attias J, Greenstein T, Peled M, Ulanovski D, Wohlgelernter J, Raveh E.
    Ear Hear; 2017 Dec; 38(2):184-193. PubMed ID: 28225734
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Receptive language as a predictor of cochlear implant outcome for prelingually deaf adults.
    Rousset A, Dowell R, Leigh J.
    Int J Audiol; 2016 Dec; 55 Suppl 2():S24-30. PubMed ID: 27160793
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 56.