These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

269 related items for PubMed ID: 27768211

  • 1. Quality-of-life assessment: arm TIVAD versus chest TIVAD.
    Burbridge B, Goyal K.
    J Vasc Access; 2016 Nov 02; 17(6):527-534. PubMed ID: 27768211
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Totally implanted venous access devices implanted in the saphenous vein. Relation between the reservoir site and comfort/discomfort of the patients.
    Toro A, Mannino M, Cappello G, Celeste S, Cordio S, Di Carlo I.
    Ann Vasc Surg; 2012 Nov 02; 26(8):1127.e9-1127.e13. PubMed ID: 22951064
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Chinesization of the quality of life assessment, venous device-port, and its reliability and validity tests for patients with breast cancer.
    Liu Y, Xu L, Jiang M, Chen B, Jing L, Zhang L, Su P, Jin F, Mao X.
    J Vasc Access; 2020 Nov 02; 21(6):983-989. PubMed ID: 32372676
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. PICC-PORT totally implantable vascular access device in breast cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy.
    Bertoglio S, Cafiero F, Meszaros P, Varaldo E, Blondeaux E, Molinelli C, Minuto M.
    J Vasc Access; 2020 Jul 02; 21(4):460-466. PubMed ID: 31674857
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Patient satisfaction and acceptance of their totally implanted central venous catheter: a French prospective multicenter study.
    Marcy PY, Schiappa R, Ferrero JM, Dahlet C, Brenet O, Yazbec G, Dubois PY, Salm B, Fouche Y, Mari V, Montastruc M, Lebrec N, Ancel B, Paillocher N, Dupoiron D, Rangeard O, Gal J, Ettaiche M, Chateau Y, Chamorey E.
    J Vasc Access; 2017 Sep 11; 18(5):390-395. PubMed ID: 28731491
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. A comparison of infections and complications in central venous catheters in adults with solid tumours.
    Coady K, Ali M, Sidloff D, Kenningham RR, Ahmed S.
    J Vasc Access; 2015 Sep 11; 16(1):38-41. PubMed ID: 25198809
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Comparison of peripherally inserted central venous catheters (PICC) versus subcutaneously implanted port-chamber catheters by complication and cost for patients receiving chemotherapy for non-haematological malignancies.
    Patel GS, Jain K, Kumar R, Strickland AH, Pellegrini L, Slavotinek J, Eaton M, McLeay W, Price T, Ly M, Ullah S, Koczwara B, Kichenadasse G, Karapetis CS.
    Support Care Cancer; 2014 Jan 11; 22(1):121-8. PubMed ID: 24005884
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Morbidity of chemotherapy administration and satisfaction in breast cancer patients: a comparative study of totally implantable venous access device (TIVAD) versus peripheral venous access usage.
    Singh KR, Agarwal G, Nanda G, Chand G, Mishra A, Agarwal A, Verma AK, Mishra SK, Goyal P.
    World J Surg; 2014 May 11; 38(5):1084-92. PubMed ID: 24305930
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of the Quality of Life of Patients with Breast or Colon Cancer with an Arm Vein Port (TIVAD) Versus a Peripherally Inserted Central Catheter (PICC).
    Burbridge B, Lim H, Dwernychuk L, Le H, Asif T, Sami A, Ahmed S.
    Curr Oncol; 2021 Apr 09; 28(2):1495-1506. PubMed ID: 33918869
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Satisfaction and Quality of Life Related to Chemotherapy With an Arm Port: A Pilot Study.
    Burbridge B, Chan IY, Bryce R, Lim HJ, Stoneham G, Haggag H, Roh C.
    Can Assoc Radiol J; 2016 Aug 09; 67(3):290-7. PubMed ID: 27209217
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Radio-opacity and incidental identified mechanical complications of totally implantable venous access devices placed in the chest.
    Surov A, Rusner C, Weigand K, John E, Spielmann RP, Behrmann C.
    Acta Radiol; 2012 Nov 01; 53(9):1035-9. PubMed ID: 23028172
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Risk of deep venous thrombosis associated with chest versus arm central venous subcutaneous port catheters: a 5-year single-institution retrospective study.
    Kuriakose P, Colon-Otero G, Paz-Fumagalli R.
    J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2002 Feb 01; 13(2 Pt 1):179-84. PubMed ID: 11830624
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Radiologic placement of a low profile implantable venous access port in a pediatric population.
    Nosher JL, Bodner LJ, Ettinger LJ, Siegel RL, Gribbin C, Asch J, Drachtman RA.
    Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2001 Feb 01; 24(6):395-9. PubMed ID: 11907746
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 14.