These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

149 related items for PubMed ID: 2778637

  • 1. Personality types and hetero- versus auto-hypnosis.
    Moss BF, Magaro PA.
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 1989 Sep; 57(3):532-8. PubMed ID: 2778637
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Subjective scoring for the Harvard Group Scale of Hypnotic Susceptibility, Form A.
    Kirsch I, Council JR, Wickless C.
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1990 Apr; 38(2):112-24. PubMed ID: 2347668
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The relation of self-reports of hypnotic depth in self-hypnosis to hypnotizability and imagery production.
    Kahn SP, Fromm E, Lombard LS, Sossi M.
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1989 Oct; 37(4):290-304. PubMed ID: 2793270
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Finding the hypnotic virtuoso--another look: a brief communication.
    Green JP, Lynn SJ, Carlson BW.
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 1992 Apr; 40(2):68-73. PubMed ID: 1582726
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. A short, unobtrusive hypnotic-assessment procedure for assessing hypnotizability level: I. Development and research.
    Pekala RJ.
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1995 Apr; 37(4):271-83. PubMed ID: 7741083
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Clinical types in a normal population: concurrent and construct validity.
    Smith P, Magaro P, Pederson S.
    J Clin Psychol; 1983 Jul; 39(4):498-506. PubMed ID: 6874987
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The personality of clinical types: an empirically derived taxonomy.
    Magaro PA, Smith P.
    J Clin Psychol; 1981 Oct; 37(4):796-809. PubMed ID: 7309868
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. The impact of a confusion technique on hypnotic responsivity in low-susceptible subjects.
    Stanger T, Tucker CM, Morgan JI.
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1996 Jan; 38(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 8712164
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Phenomenological experiences associated with hypnotic susceptibility.
    Varga K, Józsa E, Bányai EI, Gösi-Greguss AC, Kumar VK.
    Int J Clin Exp Hypn; 2001 Jan; 49(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 11190789
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Placebo versus "standard" hypnosis rationale: attitudes, expectancies, hypnotic responses, and experiences.
    Accardi M, Cleere C, Lynn SJ, Kirsch I.
    Am J Clin Hypn; 2013 Oct; 56(2):103-14. PubMed ID: 24665814
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Predicting animal attachment from hypnotizability, absorption, and dissociation scores.
    Green JP, Green ES.
    Am J Clin Hypn; 2010 Jan; 52(3):205-18. PubMed ID: 20187339
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Construct validity of the Dissociative Experiences Scale: II. Its relationship to hypnotizability.
    Frischholz EJ, Braun BG, Sachs RG, Schwartz DR, Lewis J, Shaeffer D, Westergaard C, Pasquotto J.
    Am J Clin Hypn; 1992 Oct; 35(2):145-52. PubMed ID: 1442646
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 8.