These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


293 related items for PubMed ID: 27792916

  • 1. The effect of information on beef husbandry systems on consumers' preferences and willingness to pay.
    Risius A, Hamm U.
    Meat Sci; 2017 Feb; 124():9-14. PubMed ID: 27792916
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Do consumers prefer pasture-raised dual-purpose cattle when considering meat products? A hypothetical discrete choice experiment for the case of minced beef.
    Schulze M, Spiller A, Risius A.
    Meat Sci; 2021 Jul; 177():108494. PubMed ID: 33780871
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Emerging markets for imported beef in China: Results from a consumer choice experiment in Beijing.
    Ortega DL, Hong SJ, Wang HH, Wu L.
    Meat Sci; 2016 Nov; 121():317-323. PubMed ID: 27395825
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Intensive vs. free-range organic beef. A preference study through consumer liking and conjoint analysis.
    García-Torres S, López-Gajardo A, Mesías FJ.
    Meat Sci; 2016 Apr; 114():114-120. PubMed ID: 26771143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Seasonality effects on consumers' preferences over quality attributes of different beef products.
    Ardeshiri A, Sampson S, Swait J.
    Meat Sci; 2019 Nov; 157():107868. PubMed ID: 31234027
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Consumer willingness to pay (WTP) for beef based on color and price discounts.
    Thies AJ, Altmann BA, Countryman AM, Smith C, Nair MN.
    Meat Sci; 2024 Nov; 217():109597. PubMed ID: 39024701
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Beef quality labels: A combination of sensory acceptance test, stated willingness to pay, and choice-based conjoint analysis.
    Meyerding SGH, Gentz M, Altmann B, Meier-Dinkel L.
    Appetite; 2018 Aug 01; 127():324-333. PubMed ID: 29792892
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Do demographic and beef eating preferences impact on South African consumers' willingness to pay (WTP) for graded beef?
    Strydom P, Burrow H, Polkinghorne R, Thompson J.
    Meat Sci; 2019 Apr 01; 150():122-130. PubMed ID: 30677552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. How important is local food to organic-minded consumers?
    Hempel C, Hamm U.
    Appetite; 2016 Jan 01; 96():309-318. PubMed ID: 26432955
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Where's the beef? Retail channel choice and beef preferences in Argentina.
    Colella F, Ortega DL.
    Meat Sci; 2017 Nov 01; 133():86-94. PubMed ID: 28662454
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Using the animal to the last bit: Consumer preferences for different beef cuts.
    Scozzafava G, Corsi AM, Casini L, Contini C, Loose SM.
    Appetite; 2016 Jan 01; 96():70-79. PubMed ID: 26363423
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. How do human values influence the beef preferences of consumer segments regarding animal welfare and environmentally friendly production?
    Sonoda Y, Oishi K, Chomei Y, Hirooka H.
    Meat Sci; 2018 Dec 01; 146():75-86. PubMed ID: 30103081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Beef consumer segment profiles based on information source usage in Poland.
    Żakowska-Biemans S, Pieniak Z, Gutkowska K, Wierzbicki J, Cieszyńska K, Sajdakowska M, Kosicka-Gębska M.
    Meat Sci; 2017 Feb 01; 124():105-113. PubMed ID: 27865127
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Beef meat preferences of consumers from Northwest Italy: Analysis of choice attributes.
    Merlino VM, Borra D, Girgenti V, Dal Vecchio A, Massaglia S.
    Meat Sci; 2018 Sep 01; 143():119-128. PubMed ID: 29738962
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Dutch Consumers' Willingness to Pay for Broiler Welfare.
    Mulder M, Zomer S.
    J Appl Anim Welf Sci; 2017 Sep 01; 20(2):137-154. PubMed ID: 28166413
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Would You Buy Plant-Based Beef Patties? A Survey on Product Attribute Preference and Willingness to Pay among Consumers in Liaoning Province, China.
    Zhou M, Guan B, Huang L.
    Nutrients; 2022 Oct 19; 14(20):. PubMed ID: 36297077
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. How Consumers in the UK and Spain Value the Coexistence of the Claims Low Fat, Local, Organic and Low Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
    Akaichi F, Revoredo Giha C, Glenk K, Gil JM.
    Nutrients; 2020 Jan 01; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 31906308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Understanding the role of information and taste heterogeneity in consumer preferences for functional beef: The case of the omega-3 enriched burger.
    Boncinelli F, Piracci G, Casini L.
    Meat Sci; 2021 Nov 01; 181():108614. PubMed ID: 34229235
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Consumers' beef purchasing behavior across countries.
    Dahal BR, DeLong KL, Gao S, Grebitus C.
    Meat Sci; 2024 Nov 01; 217():109611. PubMed ID: 39089086
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effect of sequential information on consumers' willingness to pay for credence food attributes.
    Botelho A, Dinis I, Lourenço-Gomes L, Moreira J, Costa Pinto L, Simões O.
    Appetite; 2017 Nov 01; 118():17-25. PubMed ID: 28760349
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 15.