These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
1215 related items for PubMed ID: 27806156
21. Novel, Validated, 5-Point Photonumeric Scales for Assessment of the Perioral Region. Hayano W, Kerscher M, Day D, Ogilvie A, Pavicic T, Lim T, Lorenc PZ, Hernandez C, Frank K, Moellhoff N, Prinz V, Mia C, Pooth R, Green J. Aesthet Surg J; 2023 Oct 13; 43(11):1347-1356. PubMed ID: 37052953 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
22. New Atrophic Acne Scar Classification: Reliability of Assessments Based on Size, Shape, and Number. Kang S, Lozada VT, Bettoli V, Tan J, Rueda MJ, Layton A, Petit L, Dréno B. J Drugs Dermatol; 2016 Jun 01; 15(6):693-702. PubMed ID: 27272075 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
23. An interrater and intrarater reliability study of 3 photographic scales for the classification of perioral aesthetic features. Cohen JL, Thomas J, Paradkar D, Rotunda A, Walker PS, Beddingfield FC, Philip A, Davis PG, Yalamanchili R. Dermatol Surg; 2014 Jun 01; 40(6):663-70. PubMed ID: 24852471 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. Skin scar preconceptions must be challenged: importance of self-perception in skin scarring. Brown BC, Moss TP, McGrouther DA, Bayat A. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2010 Jun 01; 63(6):1022-9. PubMed ID: 19501559 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
25. Reliability testing of a new scar assessment tool, Matching Assessment of Scars and Photographs (MAPS). Masters M, McMahon M, Svens B. J Burn Care Rehabil; 2005 Jun 01; 26(3):273-84. PubMed ID: 15879752 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Validated assessment scale for neck volume. Sattler G, Carruthers A, Carruthers J, Flynn TC, Geister TL, Görtelmeyer R, Hardas B, Himmrich S, Jones D, Kerscher M, Mohrmann C, Narins RS, Pooth R, Rzany B, Buchner L, Benter U, Breitscheidel L, de Maio M. Dermatol Surg; 2012 Feb 01; 38(2 Spec No.):343-50. PubMed ID: 22316190 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Reliability of the skin compliance device in the assessment of scar pliability. Cleary C, Sanders AK, Nick TG. J Hand Ther; 2007 Feb 01; 20(3):232-7; quiz 238. PubMed ID: 17658416 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
28. Application of tissue ultrasound palpation system (TUPS) in objective scar evaluation. Lau JC, Li-Tsang CW, Zheng YP. Burns; 2005 Jun 01; 31(4):445-52. PubMed ID: 15896506 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Reliability of scar assessments performed with an integrated skin testing device - the DermaLab Combo(®). Gankande TU, Duke JM, Danielsen PL, DeJong HM, Wood FM, Wallace HJ. Burns; 2014 Dec 01; 40(8):1521-9. PubMed ID: 24630817 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
30. Development and validation of a novel scar evaluation scale. Singer AJ, Arora B, Dagum A, Valentine S, Hollander JE. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2007 Dec 01; 120(7):1892-1897. PubMed ID: 18090752 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Reliability testing of the Matching Assessment using Photographs of Scars App. Klotz T, Kurmis R. Wound Repair Regen; 2020 Sep 01; 28(5):676-683. PubMed ID: 32347998 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. The Functional Movement Screen: a reliability study. Teyhen DS, Shaffer SW, Lorenson CL, Halfpap JP, Donofry DF, Walker MJ, Dugan JL, Childs JD. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2012 Jun 01; 42(6):530-40. PubMed ID: 22585621 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Scar Assessment After Breast Augmentation Surgery with Axillary Incision versus Inframammary Fold Incision: Long-Term Follow-Up in Chinese Patients. Sun J, Mu D, Liu C, Ji K, Chen L, Liu W, Luan J. Aesthetic Plast Surg; 2016 Oct 01; 40(5):699-706. PubMed ID: 27484988 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Improved reliability of the Standardized Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (SADAS) compared with the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale (ADAS). Standish TI, Molloy DW, Bédard M, Layne EC, Murray EA, Strang D. J Am Geriatr Soc; 1996 Jun 01; 44(6):712-6. PubMed ID: 8642166 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Reliability of modified adheremeter and digital pressure algometer in measuring normal abdominal tissue and C-section scars. Kelly-Martin R, Doughty L, Garkavi M, Wasserman JB. J Bodyw Mov Ther; 2018 Oct 01; 22(4):972-979. PubMed ID: 30368344 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. A new quantitative scale for clinical scar assessment. Beausang E, Floyd H, Dunn KW, Orton CI, Ferguson MW. Plast Reconstr Surg; 1998 Nov 01; 102(6):1954-61. PubMed ID: 9810991 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
37. A Randomized, Blinded Study to Validate the Merz Hand Grading Scale for Use in Live Assessments. Cohen JL, Carruthers A, Jones DH, Narurkar VA, Wong M, Cheskin LN, Trout JR, Howell DJ. Dermatol Surg; 2015 Dec 01; 41 Suppl 1():S384-8. PubMed ID: 26618469 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. Objective and subjective scar aesthetics in minimal access vs conventional access parathyroidectomy and thyroidectomy surgical procedures: a paired cohort study. O'Connell DA, Diamond C, Seikaly H, Harris JR. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2008 Jan 01; 134(1):85-93. PubMed ID: 18209143 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. A pilot comparison study of four clinician-rated atopic dermatitis severity scales. Zhao CY, Tran AQ, Lazo-Dizon JP, Kim J, Daniel BS, Venugopal SS, Rhodes LM, Law MG, Murrell DF. Br J Dermatol; 2015 Aug 01; 173(2):488-97. PubMed ID: 25891151 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
40. Psychometric Findings for the SCAR-Q Patient-Reported Outcome Measure Based on 731 Children and Adults with Surgical, Traumatic, and Burn Scars from Four Countries. Ziolkowski NI, Pusic AL, Fish JS, Mundy LR, Wong She R, Forrest CR, Hollenbeck S, Arriagada C, Calcagno M, Greenhalgh D, Klassen AF. Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Sep 01; 146(3):331e-338e. PubMed ID: 32842115 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Previous] [Next] [New Search]