These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

117 related items for PubMed ID: 2781054

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Recent advances in screen-film mammography.
    Haus AG.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep; 25(5):913-28. PubMed ID: 3306773
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Clinical evaluation of a new set of image quality criteria for mammography.
    Grahn A, Hemdal B, Andersson I, Ruschin M, Thilander-Klang A, Börjesson S, Tingberg A, Mattsson S, Håkansson M, Båth M, Månsson LG, Medin J, Wanninger F, Panzer W.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Sep; 114(1-3):389-94. PubMed ID: 15933143
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [The reduction of radiation burden in mammography using film-screen combination systems].
    Waegner U, Geissler S, Rosenkranz G.
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1990 Sep; 31(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 2277840
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. [The technical support of mammography].
    Rozhkova NI, Chikirdin EG, Riudiger IuG, Kochetova GP, Lisachenko IV, Iakobs OE.
    Med Tekh; 2000 Sep; (5):45-7. PubMed ID: 11076366
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Complex evaluation of film mammographic imaging systems. 2. Comparison of 18 systems using a signal-noise matrix].
    Friedrich M, Weskamp P.
    Rofo; 1984 Jun; 140(6):707-16. PubMed ID: 6429790
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. [A daylight film development system for mammography. Report of clinical experience after 4000 examinations (corresponding to 14,000 mammographies].
    Schulz-Wendtland R, Bauer M, Gueffroy A, Welscher M.
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1994 Jan; 4(1):16-8. PubMed ID: 8136385
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. [A comparison between traditional mammography and digital with storage phosphors].
    Lambruschi G, Tagliagambe A, Palla L, Torri T, D'Alessandro F, Pastori R, Barbieri L.
    Radiol Med; 1993 Jan; 85(1-2):59-64. PubMed ID: 8480050
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Can the average glandular dose in routine digital mammography screening be reduced? A pilot study using revised image quality criteria.
    Hemdal B, Andersson I, Grahn A, Håkansson M, Ruschin M, Thilander-Klang A, Båth M, Börjesson S, Medin J, Tingberg A, Månsson LG, Mattsson S.
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005 Jan; 114(1-3):383-8. PubMed ID: 15933142
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. [Quality assurance in radiology: quality control of radiographic cassettes].
    Ferretti PP, Sarti M, Messori P, Boni L, Seligardi P, Tassoni D, Cattini V, Piccagli V, Barani A, Bianchi C, Borasi G, Troiso A, Soliani Raschini C.
    Radiol Med; 1996 Sep; 92(3):267-73. PubMed ID: 8975314
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Digital mammography, computer-aided diagnosis, and telemammography.
    Feig SA, Yaffe MJ.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1205-30. PubMed ID: 7480666
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. [Experiences with phantom measurements in different mammographic systems].
    Schulz-Wendtland R, Aichinger U, Lell M, Kuchar I, Bautz W.
    Rofo; 2002 Oct; 174(10):1243-6. PubMed ID: 12375196
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. [Reduction of radiation dosage in mammography by using film intensifying foil systems in Poland].
    Iwaszkiewicz K, Bończyk J.
    Pol Tyg Lek; 2002 Oct; 46(17-18):346-8. PubMed ID: 1669071
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The Monte Carlo evaluation of noise and resolution properties of granular phosphor screens.
    Liaparinos PF, Kandarakis IS.
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Feb 21; 54(4):859-74. PubMed ID: 19141882
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Mammography equipment: principles, features, selection.
    Feig SA.
    Radiol Clin North Am; 1987 Sep 21; 25(5):897-911. PubMed ID: 3306772
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Magnification mammography: evaluation of screen-film and xeroradiographic techniques.
    Haus AG, Paulus DD, Dodd GD, Cowart RW, Bencomo J.
    Radiology; 1979 Oct 21; 133(1):223-6. PubMed ID: 472295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 6.