These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

200 related items for PubMed ID: 27812305

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Automated urinalysis: first experiences and a comparison between the Iris iQ200 urine microscopy system, the Sysmex UF-100 flow cytometer and manual microscopic particle counting.
    Shayanfar N, Tobler U, von Eckardstein A, Bestmann L.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2007; 45(9):1251-6. PubMed ID: 17635081
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Evaluation of the analytical performances of Cobas 6500 and Sysmex UN series automated urinalysis systems with manual microscopic particle counting.
    Bakan E, Bayraktutan Z, Baygutalp NK, Gul MA, Umudum FZ, Bakan N.
    Biochem Med (Zagreb); 2018 Jun 15; 28(2):020712. PubMed ID: 30022887
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Analytic performance of the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer and comparison with manual counts using Fuchs-Rosenthal cell chambers.
    Wah DT, Wises PK, Butch AW.
    Am J Clin Pathol; 2005 Feb 15; 123(2):290-6. PubMed ID: 15842056
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. [Evaluation of iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer].
    Park J, Kim J.
    Korean J Lab Med; 2008 Aug 15; 28(4):267-73. PubMed ID: 18728375
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of LabUMat-with-UriSed and iQ200 fully automatic urine sediment analysers with manual urine analysis.
    Akin OK, Serdar MA, Cizmeci Z, Genc O, Aydin S.
    Biotechnol Appl Biochem; 2009 Jun 15; 53(Pt 2):139-44. PubMed ID: 19021504
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Comparison of the Automated cobas u 701 Urine Microscopy and UF-1000i Flow Cytometry Systems and Manual Microscopy in the Examination of Urine Sediments.
    Lee W, Ha JS, Ryoo NH.
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2016 Sep 15; 30(5):663-71. PubMed ID: 26842372
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Analytical performance of the Iris iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer.
    Linko S, Kouri TT, Toivonen E, Ranta PH, Chapoulaud E, Lalla M.
    Clin Chim Acta; 2006 Oct 15; 372(1-2):54-64. PubMed ID: 16696963
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Urine sediment examination: a comparison of automated urinalysis systems and manual microscopy.
    Chien TI, Kao JT, Liu HL, Lin PC, Hong JS, Hsieh HP, Chien MJ.
    Clin Chim Acta; 2007 Sep 15; 384(1-2):28-34. PubMed ID: 17604012
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The comparison of automated urine analyzers with manual microscopic examination for urinalysis automated urine analyzers and manual urinalysis.
    İnce FD, Ellidağ HY, Koseoğlu M, Şimşek N, Yalçın H, Zengin MO.
    Pract Lab Med; 2016 Aug 01; 5():14-20. PubMed ID: 28856199
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of the diagnostic performance of two automated urine sediment analyzers with manual phase-contrast microscopy.
    Enko D, Stelzer I, Böckl M, Derler B, Schnedl WJ, Anderssohn P, Meinitzer A, Herrmann M.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2020 Jan 28; 58(2):268-273. PubMed ID: 31605578
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Urine sediment examination: a comparison between the manual method and the iQ200 automated urine microscopy analyzer.
    Lamchiagdhase P, Preechaborisutkul K, Lomsomboon P, Srisuchart P, Tantiniti P, Khan-u-Ra N, Preechaborisutkul B.
    Clin Chim Acta; 2005 Aug 28; 358(1-2):167-74. PubMed ID: 16018883
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. A comparison of automated urine analyzers cobas 6500, UN 3000-111b and iRICELL 3000 with manual microscopic urinalysis.
    Tantisaranon P, Dumkengkhachornwong K, Aiadsakun P, Hnoonual A.
    Pract Lab Med; 2021 Mar 28; 24():e00203. PubMed ID: 33553552
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Performance Evaluation and Comparison of the Fully Automated Urinalysis Analyzers UX-2000 and Cobas 6500.
    Wesarachkitti B, Khejonnit V, Pratumvinit B, Reesukumal K, Meepanya S, Pattanavin C, Wongkrajang P.
    Lab Med; 2016 May 28; 47(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 27069030
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Comparison of five automated urine sediment analyzers with manual microscopy for accurate identification of urine sediment.
    Cho J, Oh KJ, Jeon BC, Lee SG, Kim JH.
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2019 Oct 25; 57(11):1744-1753. PubMed ID: 31280239
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Manual urine microscopy versus automated urine analyzer microscopy in patients with acute kidney injury.
    Sharda N, Bakhtar O, Thajudeen B, Meister E, Szerlip H.
    Lab Med; 2014 Oct 25; 45(4):e152-5. PubMed ID: 25425026
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. The efficient workflow to decrease the manual microscopic examination of urine sediment using on-screen review of images.
    Cho EJ, Ko DH, Lee W, Chun S, Lee HK, Min WK.
    Clin Biochem; 2018 Jun 25; 56():70-74. PubMed ID: 29655959
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. LX-8000R and UriSed 2 fully automated urine analyzers comparison to manual microscopic examination.
    Evin CER, Aslan Ö.
    J Med Biochem; 2022 Feb 02; 41(1):91-99. PubMed ID: 35291498
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Comparison of fully automated urine sediment analyzers H800-FUS100 and LabUMat-UriSed with manual microscopy.
    Yüksel H, Kiliç E, Ekinci A, Evliyaoğlu O.
    J Clin Lab Anal; 2013 Jul 02; 27(4):312-6. PubMed ID: 23852791
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.