These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

76 related items for PubMed ID: 2783288

  • 1. Mammographic film-processor temperature, development time, and chemistry: effect on dose, contrast, and noise.
    Kimme-Smith C, Rothschild PA, Bassett LW, Gold RH, Moler C.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Jan; 152(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 2783288
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Value of increasing film processing time to reduce radiation dose during mammography.
    Skubic SE, Yagan R, Oravec D, Shah Z.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Dec; 155(6):1189-93. PubMed ID: 2122664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Increased radiation dose at mammography due to prolonged exposure, delayed processing, and increased film darkening.
    Kimme-Smith C, Bassett LW, Gold RH, Chow S.
    Radiology; 1991 Feb; 178(2):387-91. PubMed ID: 1987598
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effect of varying processing solution temperature on radiographic contrast and relative film speed of dental film.
    Matthee MJ, Becker PJ, Seeliger JE.
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1990 Dec; 45(12):525-8. PubMed ID: 2098942
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The influence of film processing temperature and time on mammographic image quality.
    Brink C, de Villiers JF, Lötter MG, van Zyl M.
    Br J Radiol; 1993 Aug; 66(788):685-90. PubMed ID: 7719681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Evaluation of radiographs developed by a new ultrarapid film processing system.
    Schmidt RA, Doi K, Sekiya M, Xu XW, Giger ML, Lu CT, Mojtahedi S, MacMahon H.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 May; 154(5):1107-10. PubMed ID: 2108553
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Comparison of image quality and mean absorbed dose to the breast for two mammographic films.
    Persliden J, Fransson V, Vitak B, Fagerberg G.
    Acta Radiol; 1993 Jul; 34(4):351-5. PubMed ID: 8318296
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. New mammography screen/film combinations: imaging characteristics and radiation dose.
    Kimme-Smith C, Bassett LW, Gold RH, Zheutlin J, Gornbein JA.
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1990 Apr; 154(4):713-9. PubMed ID: 2107663
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Densitometric evaluation of four rapid dental film processing solutions.
    Matthee MJ, Seeliger JE.
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1991 Sep; 46(9):467-9. PubMed ID: 1820681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Effects of processing conditions on mammographic image quality.
    Braeuning MP, Cooper HW, O'Brien S, Burns CB, Washburn DB, Schell MJ, Pisano ED.
    Acad Radiol; 1999 Aug; 6(8):464-70. PubMed ID: 10480042
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Film mammography: new low radiation technology.
    Chang CH, Sibala JL, Martin NL, Riley RC.
    Radiology; 1976 Oct; 121(1):215-7. PubMed ID: 959542
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Optimum processing of mammographic film.
    Sprawls P, Kitts EL.
    Radiographics; 1996 Mar; 16(2):349-54. PubMed ID: 8966292
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Processing of mammographic films: technical and clinical considerations.
    Tabar L, Haus AG.
    Radiology; 1989 Oct; 173(1):65-9. PubMed ID: 2781032
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. An evaluation of the effect of processing conditions on mammographic film contrast, fog levels and speed.
    McLean D.
    Australas Radiol; 1992 Aug; 36(3):234-7. PubMed ID: 1445107
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Characteristics of Kodak Insight, an F-speed intraoral film.
    Ludlow JB, Platin E, Mol A.
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 Jan; 91(1):120-9. PubMed ID: 11174582
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Sensitometric evaluation of some mammographic film-screen combinations.
    McLean D.
    Australas Phys Eng Sci Med; 1991 Sep; 14(3):157-62. PubMed ID: 1953502
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Optimal processing of Ektaspeed dental film.
    Fjellström CA, Fredholm U, Julin P, Rehnmark S.
    Swed Dent J; 1986 Sep; 10(4):137-43. PubMed ID: 3466376
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Effect of processor temperature on film dosimetry.
    Srivastava SP, Das IJ.
    Med Dosim; 2012 Sep; 37(2):138-9. PubMed ID: 21925862
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Optical density changes in dry-processed films.
    Al Khalifah K, Brindhaban A, Al Baloul G, Al Bather F, Abdulgafoor M.
    Radiol Technol; 2007 Sep; 79(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 17848529
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Rapid developing of Ektaspeed dental film by increase of temperature.
    Fredholm U, Julin P.
    Swed Dent J; 1987 Sep; 11(3):121-6. PubMed ID: 3477024
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 4.