These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
1161 related items for PubMed ID: 27845259
1. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment. Goossens T, Vercammen C, Wouters J, van Wieringen A. Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss. Fogerty D, Ahlstrom JB, Bologna WJ, Dubno JR. J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A physiologically-inspired model reproducing the speech intelligibility benefit in cochlear implant listeners with residual acoustic hearing. Zamaninezhad L, Hohmann V, Büchner A, Schädler MR, Jürgens T. Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():50-61. PubMed ID: 27838372 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Effects of attention on the speech reception threshold and pupil response of people with impaired and normal hearing. Koelewijn T, Versfeld NJ, Kramer SE. Hear Res; 2017 Oct; 354():56-63. PubMed ID: 28869841 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Effect of Energy Equalization on the Intelligibility of Speech in Fluctuating Background Interference for Listeners With Hearing Impairment. D'Aquila LA, Desloge JG, Reed CM, Braida LD. Trends Hear; 2017 Oct; 21():2331216517710354. PubMed ID: 28602128 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A Step Toward Precision Audiology: Individual Differences and Characteristic Profiles From Auditory Perceptual and Cognitive Abilities. Cherri D, Eddins DA, Ozmeral EJ. Trends Hear; 2024 Oct; 28():23312165241263485. PubMed ID: 39099537 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Do you hear the noise? The German matrix sentence test with a fixed noise level in subjects with normal hearing and hearing impairment. Wardenga N, Batsoulis C, Wagener KC, Brand T, Lenarz T, Maier H. Int J Audiol; 2015 Oct; 54 Suppl 2():71-9. PubMed ID: 26555195 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Speech perception in tinnitus is related to individual distress level - A neurophysiological study. Jagoda L, Giroud N, Neff P, Kegel A, Kleinjung T, Meyer M. Hear Res; 2018 Sep; 367():48-58. PubMed ID: 30031353 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The Just-Meaningful Difference in Speech-to-Noise Ratio. McShefferty D, Whitmer WM, Akeroyd MA. Trends Hear; 2016 Feb 01; 20():. PubMed ID: 26834121 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects. Auinger AB, Riss D, Liepins R, Rader T, Keck T, Keintzel T, Kaider A, Baumgartner WD, Gstoettner W, Arnoldner C. Hear Res; 2017 Jul 01; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Effects of lifetime noise exposure on the middle-age human auditory brainstem response, tinnitus and speech-in-noise intelligibility. Valderrama JT, Beach EF, Yeend I, Sharma M, Van Dun B, Dillon H. Hear Res; 2018 Aug 01; 365():36-48. PubMed ID: 29913342 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Simultaneous and forward masking of vowels and stop consonants: Effects of age, hearing loss, and spectral shaping. Fogerty D, Bologna WJ, Ahlstrom JB, Dubno JR. J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb 01; 141(2):1133. PubMed ID: 28253707 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]