These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

379 related items for PubMed ID: 27861251

  • 1. Fast Click Rate Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Response in Normal-Hearing Adults Using Continuous Loop Averaging Deconvolution.
    Kaf WA, Lewis KM, Yavuz E, Dixon SM, Van Ess M, Jamos AM, Delgado RE.
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(2):244-254. PubMed ID: 27861251
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The Effect of Test, Electrode, and Rate on Electrocochleography Measures.
    Lake AB, Stuart A.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019 Jan; 30(1):41-53. PubMed ID: 30461400
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Comparing Simultaneous Electrocochleography and Auditory Brainstem Response Measurements Using Three Different Extratympanic Electrodes.
    Lefler SM, Kaf WA, Ferraro JA.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Jun; 32(6):339-346. PubMed ID: 34082461
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Effects of adaptation on electrocochleography and auditory brain-stem responses in the elderly.
    Soucek S, Mason SM.
    Scand Audiol; 1992 Jun; 21(3):149-52. PubMed ID: 1439500
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Superiority of tympanic ball electrodes over mastoid needle electrodes for intraoperative monitoring of hearing function.
    Krieg SM, Kempf L, Droese D, Rosahl SK, Meyer B, Lehmberg J.
    J Neurosurg; 2014 May; 120(5):1042-7. PubMed ID: 24559226
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Cochlear Microphonic and Summating Potential Responses from Click-Evoked Auditory Brain Stem Responses in High-Risk and Normal Infants.
    Hunter LL, Blankenship CM, Gunter RG, Keefe DH, Feeney MP, Brown DK, Baroch K.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 May; 29(5):427-442. PubMed ID: 29708492
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Combined intra-operative monitoring of hearing by means of auditory brainstem responses (ABR) and transtympanic electrocochleography (ECochG) during surgery of intra- and extrameatal acoustic neurinomas.
    Schlake HP, Milewski C, Goldbrunner RH, Kindgen A, Riemann R, Helms J, Roosen K.
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2001 Oct; 143(10):985-95; discussion 995-6. PubMed ID: 11685605
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. [Tympanic electrocochleography with disposable electrode].
    Matsuura K, Tono T, Hara Y, Ueki Y, Ushisako Y, Morimitsu T.
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 1996 Jul; 99(7):1016-25. PubMed ID: 8776976
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Frequency-specific electrocochleography indicates that presynaptic and postsynaptic mechanisms of auditory neuropathy exist.
    McMahon CM, Patuzzi RB, Gibson WP, Sanli H.
    Ear Hear; 2008 Jun; 29(3):314-25. PubMed ID: 18344874
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Neural and receptor cochlear potentials obtained by transtympanic electrocochleography in auditory neuropathy.
    Santarelli R, Starr A, Michalewski HJ, Arslan E.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2008 May; 119(5):1028-41. PubMed ID: 18358774
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Electrocochleographic frequency-following responses as a potential marker of age-related cochlear neural degeneration.
    Temboury-Gutierrez M, Märcher-Rørsted J, Bille M, Yde J, Encina-Llamas G, Hjortkjær J, Dau T.
    Hear Res; 2024 May; 446():109005. PubMed ID: 38598943
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Mutation of OPA1 gene causes deafness by affecting function of auditory nerve terminals.
    Huang T, Santarelli R, Starr A.
    Brain Res; 2009 Dec 01; 1300():97-104. PubMed ID: 19733158
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Age-related changes in the auditory brainstem response.
    Konrad-Martin D, Dille MF, McMillan G, Griest S, McDermott D, Fausti SA, Austin DF.
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012 Jan 01; 23(1):18-35; quiz 74-5. PubMed ID: 22284838
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Intraoperative neuromonitoring for superior semicircular canal dehiscence and hearing outcomes.
    Wenzel A, Ward BK, Ritzl EK, Gutierrez-Hernandez S, Della Santina CC, Minor LB, Carey JP.
    Otol Neurotol; 2015 Jan 01; 36(1):139-45. PubMed ID: 25333320
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Using a combination of click- and tone burst-evoked auditory brain stem response measurements to estimate pure-tone thresholds.
    Gorga MP, Johnson TA, Kaminski JR, Beauchaine KL, Garner CA, Neely ST.
    Ear Hear; 2006 Feb 01; 27(1):60-74. PubMed ID: 16446565
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Electrocochleography in endolymphatic hydrops using tone-pip and click stimuli.
    Koyuncu M, Mason SM, Saunders MW.
    Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci; 1994 Feb 01; 19(1):73-8. PubMed ID: 8174307
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Compound action potential and cochlear microphonic extracted from electrocochleographic responses to condensation or rarefaction clicks.
    Arslan E, Santarelli R, Sparacino G, Sella G.
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2000 Mar 01; 120(2):192-6. PubMed ID: 11603770
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Analysis of click-evoked auditory brainstem responses using time domain cross-correlations between interleaved responses.
    Berninger E, Olofsson A, Leijon A.
    Ear Hear; 2014 Mar 01; 35(3):318-29. PubMed ID: 24557002
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Binaural interaction in the auditory brainstem response: a normative study.
    Van Yper LN, Vermeire K, De Vel EF, Battmer RD, Dhooge IJ.
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2015 Apr 01; 126(4):772-9. PubMed ID: 25240247
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. The effects of high stimulus rate on the electrocochleogram in normal-hearing subjects.
    Wilson WJ, Bowker CA.
    Int J Audiol; 2002 Dec 01; 41(8):509-17. PubMed ID: 12477171
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 19.