These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

245 related items for PubMed ID: 27869763

  • 1. Crash Risk Prediction Modeling Based on the Traffic Conflict Technique and a Microscopic Simulation for Freeway Interchange Merging Areas.
    Li S, Xiang Q, Ma Y, Gu X, Li H.
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2016 Nov 19; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 27869763
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Identifying if VISSIM simulation model and SSAM provide reasonable estimates for field measured traffic conflicts at signalized intersections.
    Huang F, Liu P, Yu H, Wang W.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan 19; 50():1014-24. PubMed ID: 23000074
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Transferability of calibrated microsimulation model parameters for safety assessment using simulated conflicts.
    Essa M, Sayed T.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Nov 19; 84():41-53. PubMed ID: 26319603
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Utilizing UAV video data for in-depth analysis of drivers' crash risk at interchange merging areas.
    Gu X, Abdel-Aty M, Xiang Q, Cai Q, Yuan J.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Feb 19; 123():159-169. PubMed ID: 30513457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Studying freeway merging conflicts using virtual reality technology.
    Xu Z, Zou X, Oh T, Vu HL.
    J Safety Res; 2021 Feb 19; 76():16-29. PubMed ID: 33653547
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Using micro-simulation to investigate the safety impacts of transit design alternatives at signalized intersections.
    Li L, Persaud B, Shalaby A.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Mar 19; 100():123-132. PubMed ID: 28130982
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Integrated traffic conflict model for estimating crash modification factors.
    Shahdah U, Saccomanno F, Persaud B.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Oct 19; 71():228-35. PubMed ID: 24950130
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Evaluation of countermeasures for red light running by traffic simulator-based surrogate safety measures.
    Lee C, So JJ, Ma J.
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2018 Jan 02; 19(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 28636489
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Safety performance evaluation of freeway merging areas under autonomous vehicles environment using a co-simulation platform.
    Chen P, Ni H, Wang L, Yu G, Sun J.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2024 May 02; 199():107530. PubMed ID: 38437756
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. A multivariate-based conflict prediction model for a Brazilian freeway.
    Caleffi F, Anzanello MJ, Cybis HB.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Jan 02; 98():295-302. PubMed ID: 27810671
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Safety analysis of the new synchronized and milwaukee B interchanges in comparison to existing designs.
    Molan AM, Hummer JE.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Dec 02; 109():29-35. PubMed ID: 28992452
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Modeling safety performance of the new super DDI design in terms of vehicular traffic and pedestrian.
    Mehrara Molan A, Hummer JE, Ksaibati K.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2019 Jun 02; 127():198-209. PubMed ID: 30903986
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Proactive crash risk prediction modeling for merging assistance system at interchange merging areas.
    Gu X, Cai Q, Lee J, Xiang Q, Ma Y, Xu X.
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2020 Jun 02; 21(3):234-240. PubMed ID: 32154738
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Impact of traffic states on freeway crash involvement rates.
    Yeo H, Jang K, Skabardonis A, Kang S.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan 02; 50():713-23. PubMed ID: 22795398
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. A simultaneous equations model of crash frequency by severity level for freeway sections.
    Ye X, Pendyala RM, Shankar V, Konduri KC.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Aug 02; 57():140-9. PubMed ID: 23672927
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Evaluating the effectiveness of active vehicle safety systems.
    Jeong E, Oh C.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2017 Mar 02; 100():85-96. PubMed ID: 28129576
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Safety analysis of freeway on-ramp merging with the presence of autonomous vehicles.
    Zhu J, Tasic I.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Mar 02; 152():105966. PubMed ID: 33493941
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Safety performance evaluation of left-side off-ramps at freeway diverge areas.
    Chen H, Zhou H, Zhao J, Hsu P.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May 02; 43(3):605-12. PubMed ID: 21376845
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Impact of real-time traffic characteristics on freeway crash occurrence: systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Roshandel S, Zheng Z, Washington S.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2015 Jun 02; 79():198-211. PubMed ID: 25841161
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Simulation of safety: a review of the state of the art in road safety simulation modelling.
    Young W, Sobhani A, Lenné MG, Sarvi M.
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 May 02; 66():89-103. PubMed ID: 24531111
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 13.