These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
Pubmed for Handhelds
PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS
Journal Abstract Search
209 related items for PubMed ID: 27881623
1. Comparison of three infertility-specific measures in men and women going through assisted reproductive technology treatment. Pedro J, Frederiksen Y, Schmidt L, Ingerslev HJ, Zachariae R, Martins MV. J Health Psychol; 2019 May; 24(6):738-749. PubMed ID: 27881623 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scales is a brief, valid and reliable tool for assessing stress in patients seeking treatment. Sobral MP, Costa ME, Schmidt L, Martins MV. Hum Reprod; 2017 Feb; 32(2):375-382. PubMed ID: 27979919 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. The Fertility Quality of Life Questionnaire (FertiQoL) Relational subscale: psychometric properties and discriminant validity across gender. Donarelli Z, Lo Coco G, Gullo S, Salerno L, Marino A, Sammartano F, Allegra A. Hum Reprod; 2016 Sep; 31(9):2061-71. PubMed ID: 27343271 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Infertility and assisted reproduction in Denmark. Epidemiology and psychosocial consequences. Schmidt L. Dan Med Bull; 2006 Nov; 53(4):390-417. PubMed ID: 17150146 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the Copenhagen Multi-Centre Psychosocial Infertility-Fertility Problem Stress Scales. Gao Y, Wang Q, Li G, Zhao X, Qin R, Kong L, Li P. Int J Nurs Pract; 2024 Oct; 30(5):e13219. PubMed ID: 37957031 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparing infertility-related stress, coping, and quality of life among assisted reproductive technology and non-assisted reproductive technology treatments. Swift A, Reis P, Swanson M. Hum Fertil (Camb); 2023 Dec; 26(5):1248-1255. PubMed ID: 36597775 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A review of the psychometric properties and implications for the use of the fertility quality of life tool. Woods BM, Bray LA, Campbell S, Holland A, Mrug S, Ladores S. Health Qual Life Outcomes; 2023 May 12; 21(1):45. PubMed ID: 37173669 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Psychometric properties of revised version of the fertility adjustment scale in infertile couples undergoing assisted reproductive technology. Torabi M, Kazemi A, Abdishahshahani M. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Dec 12; 243():16-20. PubMed ID: 31629925 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Screening for infertility-related stress at the time of initial infertility consultation: psychometric properties of a brief measure. Casu G, Gremigni P. J Adv Nurs; 2016 Mar 12; 72(3):693-706. PubMed ID: 26466927 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Assessing infertility-related stress: the factor structure of the Fertility Problem Inventory in Italian couples undergoing infertility treatment. Donarelli Z, Gullo S, Lo Coco G, Marino A, Scaglione P, Volpes A, Allegra A. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol; 2015 Mar 12; 36(2):58-65. PubMed ID: 25853286 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Are severe depressive symptoms associated with infertility-related distress in individuals and their partners? Peterson BD, Sejbaek CS, Pirritano M, Schmidt L. Hum Reprod; 2014 Jan 12; 29(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 24256990 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing infertility stress: re-examining the factor structure of the Fertility Problem Inventory. Moura-Ramos M, Gameiro S, Canavarro MC, Soares I. Hum Reprod; 2012 Feb 12; 27(2):496-505. PubMed ID: 22101025 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Psychometric properties of the Spanish version of the FertiQoL measure in couples undergoing infertility treatment. Dura-Ferrandis E, Bonilla-Campos A, Alhambra-Borras T. J Reprod Infant Psychol; 2024 Sep 12; 42(5):827-841. PubMed ID: 36814063 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Are patients at risk for psychological maladjustment during fertility treatment less willing to comply with treatment? Results from the Portuguese validation of the SCREENIVF. Lopes V, Canavarro MC, Verhaak CM, Boivin J, Gameiro S. Hum Reprod; 2014 Feb 12; 29(2):293-302. PubMed ID: 24287818 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Measuring self-efficacy to deal with infertility: Psychometric properties and confirmatory factor analysis of the Portuguese version of the infertility self-efficacy scale. Galhardo A, Cunha M, Pinto-Gouveia J. Res Nurs Health; 2013 Feb 12; 36(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 23081663 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the COMPI Fertility Problem Stress Scale-Short Form for infertile women. Hu S, Su C, Zhou L, Dai L. Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2024 Jun 12; 165(3):1261-1267. PubMed ID: 38205844 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. A Dyadic Approach to Infertility Stress, Marital Adjustment, and Depression on Quality of Life in Infertile Couples. Kim JH, Shin HS, Yun EK. J Holist Nurs; 2018 Mar 12; 36(1):6-14. PubMed ID: 29436974 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The association between stressful life events and perceived quality of life among women attending infertility treatments: the moderating role of coping strategies and perceived couple's dyadic adjustment. Zurlo MC, Cattaneo Della Volta MF, Vallone F. BMC Public Health; 2019 Nov 21; 19(1):1548. PubMed ID: 31752817 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Psychological Adjustment of Infertile Men Undergoing Fertility Treatments: An Association With Sperm Parameters. Bártolo A, Reis S, Monteiro S, Leite R, Montenegro N. Arch Psychiatr Nurs; 2016 Oct 21; 30(5):521-6. PubMed ID: 27654231 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Development of the fertility adjustment scale. Glover L, Hunter M, Richards JM, Katz M, Abel PD. Fertil Steril; 1999 Oct 21; 72(4):623-8. PubMed ID: 10521099 [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] Page: [Next] [New Search]