These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

200 related items for PubMed ID: 27890134

  • 1. The relationship between arch height and foot length: Implications for size grading.
    Hill M, Naemi R, Branthwaite H, Chockalingam N.
    Appl Ergon; 2017 Mar; 59(Pt A):243-250. PubMed ID: 27890134
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Modelling foot height and foot shape-related dimensions.
    Xiong S, Goonetilleke RS, Witana CP, Lee Au EY.
    Ergonomics; 2008 Aug; 51(8):1272-89. PubMed ID: 18608473
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Gender and age related differences in foot morphology.
    Tomassoni D, Traini E, Amenta F.
    Maturitas; 2014 Dec; 79(4):421-7. PubMed ID: 25183323
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. Describing the medial longitudinal arch using footprint indices and a clinical grading system.
    Queen RM, Mall NA, Hardaker WM, Nunley JA.
    Foot Ankle Int; 2007 Apr; 28(4):456-62. PubMed ID: 17475140
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. The relationship between foot pain, anthropometric variables and footwear among older people.
    Paiva de Castro A, Rebelatto JR, Aurichio TR.
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Jan; 41(1):93-7. PubMed ID: 19497557
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. Effect of using truncated versus total foot length to calculate the arch height ratio.
    McPoil TG, Cornwall MW, Vicenzino B, Teyhen DS, Molloy JM, Christie DS, Collins N.
    Foot (Edinb); 2008 Dec; 18(4):220-7. PubMed ID: 20307441
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. Footprint parameters as a measure of arch height.
    Hawes MR, Nachbauer W, Sovak D, Nigg BM.
    Foot Ankle; 1992 Jan; 13(1):22-6. PubMed ID: 1577337
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Taiwanese adult foot shape classification using 3D scanning data.
    Lee YC, Wang MJ.
    Ergonomics; 2015 Jan; 58(3):513-23. PubMed ID: 25361465
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. COMPARING 3D FOOT SHAPE MODELS BETWEEN TAIWANESE AND JAPANESE FEMALES.
    Lee YC, Kouchi M, Mochimaru M, Wang MJ.
    J Hum Ergol (Tokyo); 2015 Jun; 44(1):11-20. PubMed ID: 27281917
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Medial Longitudinal Arch Development of Children Aged 7 to 9 Years: Longitudinal Investigation.
    Tong JW, Kong PW.
    Phys Ther; 2016 Aug; 96(8):1216-24. PubMed ID: 26893508
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Measurements used to characterize the foot and the medial longitudinal arch: reliability and validity.
    Williams DS, McClay IS.
    Phys Ther; 2000 Sep; 80(9):864-71. PubMed ID: 10960934
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. Comparison of female foot morphology and last design in athletic footwear--are men's lasts appropriate for women?
    Krauss I, Valiant G, Horstmann T, Grau S.
    Res Sports Med; 2010 Apr; 18(2):140-56. PubMed ID: 20397116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Children's foot parameters and basic anthropometry - do arch height and midfoot width change?
    Escalona-Marfil C, Prats-Puig A, Ortas-Deunosajut X, Font-Lladó R, Ruiz-Tarrazo X, Evans AM.
    Eur J Pediatr; 2023 Feb; 182(2):777-784. PubMed ID: 36478295
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Development of a Footwear Sizing System in the National Football League.
    Wannop JW, Stefanyshyn DJ, Anderson RB, Coughlin MJ, Kent R.
    Sports Health; 2019 Feb; 11(1):40-46. PubMed ID: 30048212
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Differences in foot dimensions between children and adolescents with and without Down syndrome.
    Hassan NM, Buldt AK, Shields N, Landorf KB, Menz HB, Munteanu SE.
    Disabil Rehabil; 2022 Jul; 44(15):3959-3966. PubMed ID: 33705670
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Increase in foot arch asymmetry after full marathon completion.
    Fukano M, Nakagawa K, Inami T, Higashihara A, Iizuka S, Narita T, Maemichi T, Yoshimura A, Yamaguchi S, Iso S.
    J Sports Sci; 2021 Nov; 39(21):2468-2474. PubMed ID: 34120573
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. Foot deformation during walking: differences between static and dynamic 3D foot morphology in developing feet.
    Barisch-Fritz B, Schmeltzpfenning T, Plank C, Grau S.
    Ergonomics; 2014 Nov; 57(6):921-33. PubMed ID: 24684680
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. Three-dimensional quantitative analysis of healthy foot shape: a proof of concept study.
    Stanković K, Booth BG, Danckaers F, Burg F, Vermaelen P, Duerinck S, Sijbers J, Huysmans T.
    J Foot Ankle Res; 2018 Nov; 11():8. PubMed ID: 29541162
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Characteristics of Selected Anthropometric Foot Indicators in Physically Active Students.
    Bac A, Bogacz G, Ogrodzka-Ciechanowicz K, Kulis A, Szaporów T, Woźniacka R, Radlińska N.
    J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2018 May; 108(3):236-244. PubMed ID: 29932755
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Predictive factors for flatfoot: The role of age and footwear in children in urban and rural communities in South West Nigeria.
    Abolarin T, Aiyegbusi A, Tella A, Akinbo S.
    Foot (Edinb); 2011 Dec; 21(4):188-92. PubMed ID: 21820894
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 10.