These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search


1032 related items for PubMed ID: 2790225

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. The psychiatrist's guide to right and wrong: judicial standards of wrongfulness since M'Naghten.
    Goldstein RL, Rotter M.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1988; 16(4):359-67. PubMed ID: 3069146
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. The psychiatrist's guide to right and wrong: Part III: Postpartum depression and the "appreciation" of wrongfulness.
    Goldstein RL.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(2):121-8. PubMed ID: 2758116
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The psychiatrist's guide to right and wrong: Part II: A systematic analysis of exculpatory delusions.
    Goldstein RL.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989; 17(1):61-7. PubMed ID: 2706336
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Insanity defense debated hotly in wake of verdict in Hinckley trial.
    Hosp Community Psychiatry; 1982 Oct; 33(10):863-4. PubMed ID: 7129380
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. The insanity defence: from wild beasts to M'Naghten.
    Allnutt S, Samuels A, O'driscoll C.
    Australas Psychiatry; 2007 Aug; 15(4):292-8. PubMed ID: 17612881
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Who's afraid of forensic psychiatry?
    Miller RD.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1990 Aug; 18(3):235-47. PubMed ID: 2245241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. Defendants pleading insanity: an analysis of outcome.
    Janofsky JS, Vandewalle MB, Rappeport JR.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1989 Aug; 17(2):203-11. PubMed ID: 2758121
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14. Forensic psychiatric testimony under the Federal Rules of Evidence.
    Slovenko R.
    Leg Med; 1995 Aug; ():241-60. PubMed ID: 8788672
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Revisiting the insanity defense: contested or consensus?
    Cirincione C.
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1996 Aug; 24(2):165-76. PubMed ID: 8807157
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. [Ethical problems in forensic-psychiatric assessment].
    Barbey I.
    Psychiatr Prax; 1988 Sep; 15(5):176-81. PubMed ID: 3054984
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. ["Querulousness", anti-psychiatry, and the public around 1900].
    Schwoch R, Schmiedebach HP.
    Medizinhist J; 2007 Sep; 42(1):30-60. PubMed ID: 17874751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Was it murder or insanity? Reactions to a successful paroxysmal insanity plea in 1865.
    Spiegel AD, Spiegel AM.
    Women Health; 1992 Sep; 18(2):69-86. PubMed ID: 1632102
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]


    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 52.