These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

169 related items for PubMed ID: 27906770

  • 1.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Reliability and reproducibility of the new AO/OTA 2018 classification system for proximal humeral fractures: a comparison of three different classification systems.
    Marongiu G, Leinardi L, Congia S, Frigau L, Mola F, Capone A.
    J Orthop Traumatol; 2020 Mar 12; 21(1):4. PubMed ID: 32166457
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4. The Neer classification system for proximal humeral fractures. An assessment of interobserver reliability and intraobserver reproducibility.
    Sidor ML, Zuckerman JD, Lyon T, Koval K, Cuomo F, Schoenberg N.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1993 Dec 12; 75(12):1745-50. PubMed ID: 8258543
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5. Interobserver agreement of Neer and AO classifications for proximal humeral fractures.
    Papakonstantinou MK, Hart MJ, Farrugia R, Gabbe BJ, Kamali Moaveni A, van Bavel D, Page RS, Richardson MD.
    ANZ J Surg; 2016 Apr 12; 86(4):280-4. PubMed ID: 26887373
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6. 3D-printed Handheld Models Do Not Improve Recognition of Specific Characteristics and Patterns of Three-part and Four-part Proximal Humerus Fractures.
    Spek RWA, Schoolmeesters BJA, Oosterhoff JHF, Doornberg JN, van den Bekerom MPJ, Jaarsma RL, Eygendaal D, IJpma F, Traumaplatform 3D Consortium.
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2022 Jan 01; 480(1):150-159. PubMed ID: 34427569
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7. The Impact of Three-Dimensional CT Imaging on Intraobserver and Interobserver Reliability of Proximal Humeral Fracture Classifications and Treatment Recommendations.
    Berkes MB, Dines JS, Little MT, Garner MR, Shifflett GD, Lazaro LE, Wellman DS, Dines DM, Lorich DG.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2014 Aug 06; 96(15):1281-1286. PubMed ID: 25100775
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8. Classification of proximal humeral fractures based on a pathomorphologic analysis.
    Resch H, Tauber M, Neviaser RJ, Neviaser AS, Majed A, Halsey T, Hirzinger C, Al-Yassari G, Zyto K, Moroder P.
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Mar 06; 25(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 26475635
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11. The reliability and reproducibility of the Hertel classification for comminuted proximal humeral fractures compared with the Neer classification.
    Iordens GI, Mahabier KC, Buisman FE, Schep NW, Muradin GS, Beenen LF, Patka P, Van Lieshout EM, Den Hartog D.
    J Orthop Sci; 2016 Sep 06; 21(5):596-602. PubMed ID: 27324664
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12. AST classification of proximal humeral fractures: introduction and interobserver reliability assessment.
    Cuny C, Baumann C, Mayer J, Guignand D, Irrazi M, Berrichi A, Ionescu N, Guillemin F.
    Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol; 2013 Jan 06; 23(1):35-40. PubMed ID: 23412405
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13. Reliability and Reproducibility of the OTA/AO Classification for Humeral Shaft Fractures.
    Mahabier KC, Van Lieshout EM, Van Der Schaaf BC, Roukema GR, Punt BJ, Verhofstad MH, Den Hartog D.
    J Orthop Trauma; 2017 Mar 06; 31(3):e75-e80. PubMed ID: 27755334
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15. Reliability of the classification of proximal femur fractures: Does clinical experience matter?
    Crijns TJ, Janssen SJ, Davis JT, Ring D, Sanchez HB, Science of Variation Group.
    Injury; 2018 Apr 06; 49(4):819-823. PubMed ID: 29549969
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Intraobserver and interobserver agreement in the classification and treatment of proximal humeral fractures.
    Gracitelli MEC, Dotta TAG, Assunção JH, Malavolta EA, Andrade-Silva FB, Kojima KE, Ferreira Neto AA.
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Jun 06; 26(6):1097-1102. PubMed ID: 28131681
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The reliability and reproducibility of the Neer classification system--digital radiography (PACS) improves agreement.
    Mahadeva D, Dias RG, Deshpande SV, Datta A, Dhillon SS, Simons AW.
    Injury; 2011 Apr 06; 42(4):339-42. PubMed ID: 20206348
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18. 'Absolute' inter-observer classifications agreement for proximal humeral fractures with a single shoulder anteroposterior X-ray.
    Martínez-Sola R, León-Muñoz VJ, Najem-Rizk AN, Soler-Vasco B, Arrieta-Martínez CJ, López-Sorroche E, Cárdenas-Grande E, Salmerón-Vélez G, Ruiz-Molina JÁ, Martínez-Martínez F, Santonja-Medina F.
    J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong); 2021 Apr 06; 29(2):23094990211010520. PubMed ID: 33896261
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. 3D-radiographic analysis does not improve the Neer and AO classifications of proximal humeral fractures.
    Sjödén GO, Movin T, Aspelin P, Güntner P, Shalabi A.
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1999 Aug 06; 70(4):325-8. PubMed ID: 10569259
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Evaluation of the Neer system of classification of proximal humeral fractures with computerized tomographic scans and plain radiographs.
    Bernstein J, Adler LM, Blank JE, Dalsey RM, Williams GR, Iannotti JP.
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1996 Sep 06; 78(9):1371-5. PubMed ID: 8816653
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.