These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


Pubmed for Handhelds

PUBMED FOR HANDHELDS

Journal Abstract Search

176 related items for PubMed ID: 27912075

  • 1. Is Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Always Necessary for Dental Implant Placement?
    Deeb G, Antonos L, Tack S, Carrico C, Laskin D, Deeb JG.
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2017 Feb; 75(2):285-289. PubMed ID: 27912075
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 2. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images.
    Correa LR, Spin-Neto R, Stavropoulos A, Schropp L, da Silveira HE, Wenzel A.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 23442085
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 3. Reliability of Orthopantomography and Cone-beam Computed Tomography in Presurgical Implant Planning: A Clinical Study.
    Sahota J, Bhatia A, Gupta M, Singh V, Soni J, Soni R.
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug 01; 18(8):665-669. PubMed ID: 28816186
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 4.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 5.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 6.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 7.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 8.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 9. Implant-guided volumetric analysis of edentulous maxillary bone with cone-beam computerized tomography scan. Maxillary sinus pneumatization classification.
    Tolstunov L, Thai D, Arellano L.
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Aug 01; 38(4):377-90. PubMed ID: 22913308
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 10. Pre- and postoperative assessment of sinus grafting procedures using cone-beam computed tomography compared with panoramic radiographs.
    Baciut M, Hedesiu M, Bran S, Jacobs R, Nackaerts O, Baciut G.
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 May 01; 24(5):512-6. PubMed ID: 22220751
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 11.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 12.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 13.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 14.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 15.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 16. Preoperative implant planning considering alveolar bone grafting needs and complication prediction using panoramic versus CBCT images.
    Guerrero ME, Noriega J, Jacobs R.
    Imaging Sci Dent; 2014 Sep 01; 44(3):213-20. PubMed ID: 25279342
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 17. The influence of dental implants in periapical and panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography images: a clinical study.
    Felix RP, Shinkai RSA, Rockenbach MIB.
    Gen Dent; 2018 Sep 01; 66(2):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 29513241
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 18.
    ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 19. Evaluation of a Novel Cone Beam Computed Tomography Scanner for Bone Density Examinations in Preoperative 3D Reconstructions and Correlation with Primary Implant Stability.
    Sennerby L, Andersson P, Pagliani L, Giani C, Moretti G, Molinari M, Motroni A.
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Oct 01; 17(5):844-53. PubMed ID: 24373386
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

  • 20. Influence of 2D vs 3D imaging and professional experience on dental implant treatment planning.
    Fortes JH, de Oliveira-Santos C, Matsumoto W, da Motta RJG, Tirapelli C.
    Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Feb 01; 23(2):929-936. PubMed ID: 29907931
    [Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]

    Page: [Next] [New Search]
    of 9.